• TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    21 hours ago

    My ex-wife used tarot cards to justify cheating on me, and then leaving me.

    I didn’t even know she had tarot cards.

    • Nangijala
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      It is amazing what excuses cheaters will use to justify their behavior.

      In my case, my ex did the nature documentary argument way before the manosphere became a thing. I dunno why that is a pattern with that sort of man. They like to think of themselves as superior intellectuals until it comes to sex, then they will make graphs and studies and be pseudo David Attenboroughs to justify that their caveman urges are too strong for them to overcome.

      I guess the female version of that is tarot cards, coffee grounds and zodiacs? I hope you found a better lady later, because that one surely wasn’t worth keeping in your life!

      • Hadriscus@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Well, it’s probably true. Their urges are too strong for them to overcome. But that’s what an adult should be able to do, overcome the fucking urges

    • potentiallynotfelix@lemmy.fish
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Not necessarily. I think that predicting crime using public information can be beneficial. It just shouldn’t be invasive or biased, and shouldn’t be used in court to justify a warrant or arrest.

      • 6nk06@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        20 hours ago

        I agree with you, but:

        invasive, biased, used in courts

        All those things that will soon happen whether we like it or not.

      • Michael@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        19 hours ago

        Let’s not kid ourselves. Publicly available information is invasive and a violation of privacy.

        We have corporations who have effectively set up mass surveillance networks and they call it “adtech”.

        There is an entire economy surrounding “publicly available information”. There are corporations that act as as data brokers and people search websites that compile way too much sensitive information about private individuals. Newspapers systematically report on events that aren’t really of public interest concerning private individuals; e.g. arrest records and these articles hang around forever even if the arrest doesn’t result in a conviction or the crime is expunged.

        If this was employed by the government or law enforcement, it would absolutely include data that extends far beyond the reaches of publicly available information — and it’s worth pointing out that the US has a mass surveillance network in the form of the NSA/PRISM.

        There is zero way you could convince me that AI, prone to hallucination, would be well served to predict crime or criminals. Even if it didn’t hallucinate, it still wouldn’t be possible to predict crime - only potentially anticipate a crime. We aren’t 2D characters following a script — anything can happen.

        Law enforcement is already very unhinged. Let’s not cheerlead the addition of any tools that aid in psychosis to their arsenal.

  • rational_lib@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    19 hours ago

    It seems that the woman has a penchant for believing mystical guidance. “A few years ago, she visited an astrologer and it took a whole year for her to accept that none of it was real,” the husband said.

    That should’ve been the first clue. I can date someone who engages in fantasy for a bit, but if they never come back to reality then just put the relationship down humanely.

  • Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    Sure, it can’t count how many Rs are in strawberry, but it definitely for sure can predict future affairs in bean stew ingredients. /s

    • gamer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      can predict future affairs in bean stew ingredients.

      Ain’t nothing more refreshing than adding some coffee grounds to your bean stew

    • SpruceBringsteen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      2 days ago

      Theyre not in the clear yet. This type of crazy doesn’t exit your life just the once.

      Heck, you’re lucky if you catch them entering back in before they’ve made another exit.

    • Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      2 days ago

      Bad for the kids…

      “I laughed it off as nonsense,” he said. “But she didn’t. She told me to leave, informed our kids about the divorce, and the next thing I knew, I was getting a call from her lawyer.”

        • intensely_human@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Easy for a man to get custody of the kids? What world do you live in?

          My friend’s ex repeatedly crashed her car while drunk with their daughter in the car and he had to fight a pretty much non-stop court battle for over a decade to maintain his 50%.

          • Stamau123@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            20 hours ago

            that why I said you never know

            basically the same for me and my sisters with our parents. Dad in the army and mom is robbing walmarts to pay for crack. Hmm, mom gets summer custody it is!

        • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          84
          arrow-down
          30
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Here’s a litmus test to use when deciding to correct someone’s English online: did you understand what they meant?

          Yes? Leave them alone.

          No? Ask for clarification, then leave them alone.

          • TechLich@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            27
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            A lot of non-native English speakers use online communication to practice and most want to be corrected so they can improve.

            A lot of native English speakers make mistakes accidentally, or speak with a dialect and some of them get really angry when people try to correct them.

            It’s sometimes tricky to know which is which. The best solution is for everyone to just be kind to each other but…

            • PattyMcB@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              22 hours ago

              This is the internet. There’s no room for kindness here!

              /s, but a lot of people do think that way

          • RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            35
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            Not everyone gets offended when they are corrected. When someone corrects my Spanish I presume they are trying to help me rather than put me down.

            • AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              Assume. Presume implies you have some reason or evidence for that belief.

              Edit: I find it hilarious how many people are downvoting me for correcting somebody who has just said they appreciate corrections.

              • Goretantath@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                2 days ago

                If “having a reason” is ok to use it, then good people existing is a pretty good reason, thus you failed at correcting them.

          • slaacaa@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            2 days ago

            I think correction is fine, as another comment said it’s a good way to get feedback and learn.

            The problem with this comment for me was the condescension and the rudeness.

            • Jarix@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              21 hours ago

              I didn’t read it that way. It’s just blunt, which is a bit rough to some people, but what do you see as condescending? asking because i could almost have made this comment, but probably would not have

              (I am not a good communicator so i really want to understand why you feel it was that way)

          • WideEyedStupid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            There are plenty of people, myself included, who prefer to be corrected, because otherwise how will we learn? If nobody corrects us, we’ll keep making the same stupid mistakes.

            If someone doesn’t want to be corrected, they are free to ignore it and to continue doing it wrong.

          • Linktank@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            2 days ago

            So you responding to my message to complain about the content, what’s the test for that? You just follow your gut? Or do you have some annoying advice you’d like to give me on when to best give annoying advice?

        • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Well…maybe she made him a party favor? Tied him to the bed, and put a blinding hood on him, then injected liquid viagra into his veins every 4 hours, and invited the whole neighborhood over to pass him around. With him never even knowing who he had sex with, and who fucked him in the ass…

          See? She made him a favor!

          What? It’s already been established that the ex IS crazy. Loraina Bobbitt did far worse, and she wasn’t even crazy…kinda justified actually.

  • 74 183.84@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    I mean at this point, shame on him for marrying someone like that to begin with