• JayObey711@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 hour ago

    I fucking love German grammar!!! It’s awesome. The Futur 2 and Plusquamperfekt are my favourite. We have some funky letters like ß (<- look at this guy :) ) and weird sounds like the CH and SCH. There is this one grammar “rule” that I don’t like. Because there is no real rule. You just have to know. It’s about the “connecting s”. So in some compound words you sometimes put an s between the two words to connect them. But there is not really a way to know when to do it. It’s Rind + Fleisch = Rindlfeisch but Rind + Leder = Rindsleder with an S.

    Thank you all for coming to my tedtalk.

  • SorteKaninA
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    Meanwhile Danish turns the indefinite article into a definite suffix. Like:

    A house: “et hus”
    The house: “huset”
    Houses: “huse”
    The houses: “husene”

  • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    It’s a weird contrast between Germanic language German and Germanic language English

    I wonder if it comes from Gaelic languages

  • gilgameth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    10 hours ago

    In Persian we don’t even have “the”. If it’s indefinite we use the equivalent of “a”. If it’s definite we don’t use anything.

    • jenesaisquoi@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      That sounds… efficient

      In Russian there aren’t any articles, and no concept of definite/indefinite. Hence the cliché accent in English leaving out all of the “the” and “a/an”

      • gilgameth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I have guessed the lack of articles in Russian from the cliché! By the way, how many cases does Russian have?

        • devfuuu@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          25 minutes ago

          I finally realize why the people coming from the east to speak Portuguese have some special quirks in their efforts. It’s really hard coming from that perspective.

        • jenesaisquoi@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          8 hours ago

          Six real cases, plus some remnants of two more that are no longer used.

          The same ones as in German, plus prepositive (typical use is “in” something) and instrumental (typical use is “with” something). They also distinguish between living and non-living, for example, accusative male is the same as nominative male if the subject is non-living (things), but if living (humans and animals) then it is the same as genitive male.

          They also love to use genitive for everything. Let’s say you’re counting. One is nominative, two through four is genitive singular, five through twenty and zero is genitive plural. Above twenty the last digit determines the case.

          Wanna say a date? Ordinal number in genitive according to the rules above for the day, genitive for the month.

          Wanna say x amount of something? The something is genitive. If it is countable, it’s genitive plural, if it’s uncountable, it’s genitive singular. You might think, that’s not so bad, until you discover that Russians consider onions, potatoes, carrots etc as uncountable. Of course you can’t say 5 carrots! Impossible to count them. You must say “5 pieces of carrot” in genitive plural. Duh.

          Please hit like and subscribe to be notified when a new Russian grammar rant is published.

          • gilgameth@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 hours ago

            You might think, that’s not so bad, until you discover that Russians consider onions, potatoes, carrots etc as uncountable. Of course you can’t say 5 carrots! Impossible to count them.

            :))) I love these random craziness of languages. And I don’t want to know the reason behind them. Like when I learned the word for “girl” is neuter in German, I was happy but when I learned the reason, it was boring.

            I swear Persian might be the easiest language there is.

  • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    10 hours ago

    That’s why “the” is such a common word in English. If you have a toddler, teach them to read (recognize) the word “the.” Then sit down together with a book, reading aloud with your finger running under the words, and pausing to let them read all the "the"s. It’ll help them get the connection between print and speech, even if they’re still working on the alphabet. And they’ll feel powerful.

    As a lesson in English, you can explain that even though there’s no t, h, or e sound in it, it’s pronounced “the” because whenever t and h are together we say (long exaggerated th sound), and it’s such an old and common word that we got lazy about saying “ee” and now we just say “uh.”

    • Squeezer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I taught my daughter to read during covid when the schools were closed. ‘The’ was the first word she learned to read, and I did exactly what you suggest, pausing for her to read it. It really helped. When my workshop reopened I made her a silver badge of the word ‘the’ to celebrate.

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    What really fucks with me is akkusativ suffixes

    If dein grampa isn’t the first and foremost noun in a sentence then it has to be deinen grampa but if it’s a feminine word the the rule doesn’t matter

    Meine Oma Liebt deine Oma.

    Mein Opa Liebt deine Oma.

    Mein Opa Liebt deinen Opa.

    Meine Oma Liebt deinen Opa.

    I want to be good at this but that shit makes no sense, Hans. And why the fuck does a Library have a gender?!

    EDIT: Liebt not Liebst in this context