• Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    You do have to wonder if Republican voters are aware of what demographic controls Israel.

  • LotrOrc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    If only the democrats actually listened to AOC and Sanders.

    But they don’t.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Oh I’m sure they’ll listen to them right up until the point where they find another member of the Clinton family that hasn’t had their turn yet.

    • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 hours ago

      “But what if we compromised with them and our donors, and then compromised with the Republicans, and then put on our shocked pikachu face when the Republicans don’t compromise with us in turn???”

      Legit, the second half of the problem is related to our gerontocracy. These fucking dinosaurs are still acting like it’s the 1970s and 1980s, when they first came to power.

      • ZeroOne@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        Considering that Liberals are literally right wingers (Political Science 101) masquerading as leftists, yeah you are turds in every way.

        We actually agree on something

  • TheThrillOfTime@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Americans need to stop saying the Democrats want universal healthcare. They don’t and they’ve made that clear numerous times.

      • TheThrillOfTime@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Obamacare, the multiple times in 2016, 2020, and 2024 when they were deciding on a platform and universal healthcare never made the cut. They’ve had plenty of opportunities to push it and they never do.

        • Grimtuck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          9 hours ago

          That’s because you’re political system is broken by lobbying. Fix that and you might start to see both parties make decisions for the people instead of the corporation’s and billionaires that give them both insane amounts of money. Money they need to stay elected.

          • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            There’s the two sides of the Democratic party. AOC (pictured) supports fixing that. Yet the DNC keeps nominating moderates who refuse to give more power to the working class.

        • Nalivai@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Recently, you, Americans, made it crystal clear that campaigning on universal healthcare will not get you elected. Numerous times. Obamacare was the last time the word healthcare wasn’t a ticket to losertown. A bunch of progressives got this stupid idea that if you don’t vote, things will magically happen exactly as you want them to happen. Then they’re surprised that regressives vote their people in power and implement exactly what they want to implement.

          • TheThrillOfTime@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            I find that hard to believe. Universal healthcare is the most popular policy proposal in the US for the voters. 60+% of Americans support it.

            Also, there has been numerous studies done in the last 15 years that show that voting doesn’t get popular policies passed. If the rich want something, it is more likely to get passed whereas if the average voters want something, it is unlikely to get passed.

            • Nalivai@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 hours ago

              The way Americans vote doesn’t correlate with what they want. When the rich want something, they engage with the established systems to work towards their goal. When the people want something, they tend to ignore the systems that are made specifically to hear their voices, and do everything but use them. Then the system works as intended, and everyone’s surprised.
              We can’t really blame an average American, they’re overworked, uneducated, solitary, angry, dumb, and confused. But it is what it is.

            • peregrin5@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              2 hours ago

              It’s popular until the Republicans say you’re going to have to wait in line or it will somehow increase your taxes (or better yet: “this means your hard-earned dollars will go to the bottom surgery of an immigrant trans person who will participate in women’s sports and use the women’s bathroom!”).

              Then everyone drops it like a hot potato.

              You have to remember for Americans, they love being given free stuff, but the second they hear someone they don’t like is also getting the free stuff, they’d rather cut off their nose to spite their face. They voted for Trump not because they like him, but because they hate the left.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    21 hours ago

    MTG is just there for the lols. She was rich before she got elected and gotten even richer since. She’a there to pass out the matches and watch the world burn

  • Prunebutt@slrpnk.netBanned from community
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    99
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’d argue that Nancy Pelosy is more representative of the dems than AOC.

    • Hellahunter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      Well, I’d argue Nancy is more representative of wealthy American neo-liberals, which most of us are not.

      I’d even argue is Nancy even a dem at this point she’s more of a centrist parading around as a dem.

      • frostysauce@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        she’s more of a centrist parading around as a dem.

        And that perfectly represents the party as a whole.

      • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        41
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Nancy is more representative of wealthy American neo-liberals

        Yes which is much closer to who the Dems are representing as a whole

        • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          No, based upon the popularity of policies, AOC is FAR closer to representing normal people than more conservative democrats like Pelosi are?

          There is a reason people hate centrist corporate democrats, it is because they don’t even pretend to push policies people desperately need.

      • StaticFalconar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        While Nancy’s actual politics may be more centrists than dem, shes still one of the old guards that must go away for any actual change in the party.

          • Allonzee@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            23 hours ago

            Dems are a far right party that only look centrist if you squint looking at them from inside fascist crazy town.

            To basically anyone in the developed world, of which we are not, Luigi murdered a mass murderer, to any fascist or neoliberal here, we have to let murderers for profit let the free market decide who gets life saving healthcare, as just 1 of innumerable examples.

            Neoliberals don’t squee like little girls at the hello kitty store when people suffer and die needlessly when it facilitates private profit as the Fascists do, but they don’t see it as the social fabric betrayal and atrocity it is either. “free market forces, mr dying homeless person, but I support your right to die in the gutter of hunger and exposure as any identity you choose!” Because it’s free to, but people need their basic survival met first, and that takes resources that go to them and not the robber barons that pay off both parties.

            • orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              23 hours ago

              agreed. In context, they’re centrists for the States. Bernie is only barely left of center to the rest of the world but considered extreme here by corporate media and the other government clowns.

              • peregrin5@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                11
                ·
                edit-2
                21 hours ago

                Bernie is only barely left of center to the rest of the world

                When people say dumbass shit like this it makes me wonder what part of the world they are talking about.

                All of Africa: right wing compared to America

                Most of South America: right wing compared to America

                Pretty much all of Asia: right wing compared to America

                Middle East: lmao

                Russia: lmao

                Europe: about 70% right wing or similar to America with a handful of countries that might be considered left wing maybe but are sliding right as well.

                The British Commonwealth: about the same as America except for the healthcare aspect.

                Maybe you consider Antarctica left wing? Maybe the Oceans? Maybe the only part of the world that exists to these idiots are uber white Aryan nordic countries only? Or maybe you live in a fantasy dimension and are somehow communicating to us through a wormhole via Lemmy.

                • BeNotAfraid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  18 hours ago

                  Europe is absolutely not as you describe. That’s what the media feeds you in North America.

        • Hellahunter@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          I totally agree with you she must go, she’s part of the let’s maintain the status quo dems.

      • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        20 hours ago

        You know “centrist” is not a political party, right? Fuckin kids these days, what are they teaching you…

        • Hellahunter@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Literally nothing considering I’m an adult these days. But how’s being a smug ass hat been going for ya?

      • JeSuisUnHombre@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 day ago

        That’s a funny take. The former speaker of the house who hand selected her replacement and was the leader of the Democratic caucus for more than a decade, and you’re basically calling them a DINO

        • peregrin5@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          MAGA regularly calls Mitch McConnell a RINO. Why should we handle Nancy any differently?

              • peregrin5@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                4 hours ago

                It means that a true Democrat or Republican is one who represents the views of their constituents. Not who holds the reins of power in their respective parties. This is a valid definition.

    • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      The centers of both parties are functionally allies, the power structure of the Democratic party despises the kind of progressive politics AOC and Bernie do far more than the Republicans they claim to oppose even when those Republicans are literal out in the open fascists. Chuck Shumer is exhibit A and will become a historical touchstone for discussions about how neoliberalism always in the end sets up the conditions for fascism and then pathetically collapses in the crucial moment of resistance against fascism.

      Fuck that, both parties need to go, how many times has the Democratic party laughed in the face of Bernie as they blatantly undermined him?

      No, I treat Republicans as an existential threat, which means I also logically see the entrenched power structures of the Democrats that are happy to lose to Republicans rather than evolve, as an existential threat.

      Pelosi is a Democrat through and through, AOC and Bernie are Democrats because they have no choice in the status quo.

            • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              10
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              Weak response, provide evidence that trying to reform the Democratic party is a better strategy.

              They will not change their strategy, the organization is structurally incapable of it, how much more proof do you need?

              • SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                10
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 day ago

                Maga fundamentally changed the Republican Party but you’re saying the progressives are unable to do the same?

                Why wouldn’t they be able to?

                • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 day ago

                  Because they weren’t afraid of change before we are “ready for it” like you are, which is the only reason the tea party worked. They were willing to tear everything down if it wasn’t working, and that made the rest of the Republican party blink.

                  Your strategy is exactly the kind of political pushback people like Shumer and Pelosi prefer, because it is strategically ineffectual at threatening their power.

            • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              19 hours ago

              The bi partisan police state and Military Industrial Complex existed before Trump ever took public office.

              • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                A fair point.

                I would point, however, to that emphasizing the need to create a progressive party, rather than prioritizing the destruction of the now-castrated Dems.

                • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 day ago

                  The entrenched power structure is always going to narrativize a genuine alternative to the Democratic party as harsh toned leftists destroying things to destroy things, so if you are afraid of that in your rhetoric (even if you end up supporting more reform like policies in the end) you are already making it incredibly easy to be walked all over by people that resist all change.

                  No, the strategy is to go for the throat of the DNC and happily back off when they realize you aren’t messing around and give material concessions to the people they are supposed to represent. This is why the tea party was unfortunately successful, now is when the left does our version.

                  If that breaks the Democratic party in the process, that is their fault for building a house of cards indifferent to the suffering of people in the US.

        • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          Actually one of the biggest arguments in geology/evolutionary biology is whether evolution tends to be a slow, continous steady process or whether it happens in explosive spurts seperated by periods of little evolution.

          There is abundant evidence that both happens, so your metaphor is tenous at best.

  • GuyFawkes@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    Anyone that has to hear “the two parties are not the same” is too stupid to change their tiny little mind and recognize it.

    • lutillian@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Both parties are certainly not the same, however both parties have a lot of the same interests. The truth is establishment Democrats have very little personal reason to fight back against these insane right wing policies because they personally benefit from them; and that is the singular truth that makes our current political climate so dangerous.

      While they don’t have any reason too fight back however, they also will not generally propose these policies. They just won’t block them, so the solution is simple, prevent these policies from being proposed.

      However lots of people want to see the world in black and white and just want to conflate concepts like this with something that has no nuance to it like “both parties are the same” and blindly parrot that statement without stopping to analyze what it’s really talking about and that’s a huge issue since it disenfranchises more vulnerable people. I suspect blanket statements like this are likely a large contributor to the US’ low voter participation, and i wouldn’t be surprised if a lot of them originated from foreign influence.

    • arrow74@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      23 hours ago

      I once got a death threat here on lemmy for suggesting that democrats were better than Republicans. That was interesting to say the least

    • deeferg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      22 hours ago

      They have to live with the fact they didn’t vote as the next Hitler takes hold, it’s also the only thing their stupid little minds can use to go on without acknowledging their conscience that wants them to yeet themselves out a window.

      • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        20 hours ago

        They have to live with the fact they didn’t vote as the next Hitler takes hold,

        They think Thalmann did nothing wrong, so if anything, they celebrate that they didn’t vote as the next Hitler takes hold.

    • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      32
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Sure, one “party” is fascist and the other “party” is collaborators. Lots of differences to point out there.

      • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        24 hours ago

        Yawn.

        Yet another goon who hasn’t bothered looking up both party’s voting history or criminal conviction history.

        Do your homework.

        • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          20 hours ago

          He did do his homework. He’s not saying this shit out of ignorance but out of malice. He’s a Russian shill.

          You begin to recognize the usernames.

          • nyctre@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            10 minutes ago

            Boost’ user tagging feature has made my Lemmy experience so much better. The tag pops out so it’s the first thing I notice before even reading the reply so I know to prepare myself and not take it seriously if it’s tagged as a troll or whatever. Easier than remembering who said what in previous posts.

              • nyctre@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                Ah, dunno about that, sorry. Been using it for a few years, since it was also a reddit app and I just paid for the ad free version

  • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    21 hours ago

    And yet when the legislature arrives to give us free Healthcare the Democrats don’t pass it despite having a majority.

    Both sides aren’t the same, but their choices produce the same results.

    • John@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      19 hours ago

      There’s always conveniently a cohort of Dems that vote against party lines. Every. Time. Then they can shrug and say “welp, we tried”.

      Two sides of the same capitalist shit sandwich.

      • rational_lib@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        15 hours ago

        This is because of red state Democrats like Manchin. Because every state gets two senators, there are more senators from red states than blue states. So Democrats have to capture more of the center to hey the majority in the Senate.

    • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      21 hours ago

      And yet when the legislature arrives to give us free Healthcare the Democrats don’t pass it despite having a majority.

      Obamacare saved my life and was the product of immense effort at a time when the Dems were more conservative than they are today. Blue Dogs were wiped out in 2010 and 2012 because of that (correct) rage against them.

      You can say what the Dems managed to do was not enough - and it’s not. Millions of people are not as lucky as me (though I suppose poverty is a strange kind of luck - poverty in a blue state, perhaps, more appropriately) and still suffer immensely under our utterly fucked healthcare system. But it’s not the same result as doing nothing - or worse, handing control over to the GOP. Millions like me owe a greatly improved quality of life, or our very lives, to the reforms passed.

      If you have a plan to destroy the Dems and replace them all with left-wing progressives, and put demo charges on the base of our utterly fucked rat’s nest of a government structure, I’m not here to tell you not to. But I am here to tell you that both sides are not the same for millions of disadvantaged demographics, even if the Dems are not enough for those selfsame demographics.

      • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        That’s really the one big thing I can think of that they did get through.

        It got like 80mil people health insurance which was great.

        It was still a huge compromise from the free universal healthcare that was the original goal.

        It’s worth noting that Obama did this by going around party leadership. Once he was in power he did not obey the DNC like other candidates have.

        • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          20 hours ago

          It’s worth noting that Obama did this by going around party leadership. Once he was in power he did not obey the DNC like other candidates have.

          I mean, the president is party leadership. And Biden, an ardent party loyalist, is the only Dem president in the past 50 years which has been in lockstep with the wider party.

          • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            19 hours ago

            When i say “the party” i mean the privately ran organization who is legally allowed to choose whoever their canidate is, and doesn’t have to legally hold a fair primary election or any election at all.

            Sure the president gets a temporary seat at the table, but the other DNC leaders do not want them to be in control.

            The fact that Obama tried to push free healthcare made the DNC leadership furious, because that isn’t what he told them before the primaries. But because they were stuck with him they instead had other loyalist dems try to help Republicans block his policies and then enjoyed the popularity Obama was bringing to the party.

            • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              6 hours ago

              Sure there was a silver lining of sorts, but the ACA transferred more power and wealth to medical insurance companies than there was before, hastening our approach to where we are now. I’m sorry if I don’t give much credit to the medicine we were given to dull the pain, because it didnt fix the problem. In fact, since so many think it did help so much, we have ignored the problem so we could argue about whether the medicine is nice or bad or rude or evil or etc.

      • andybytes@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Wow a government that taxes you into oblivion for the War Pigs Somehow squeezes out a success. Every once in a while a blind squirrel finds a nut. You don’t have a mental process that thinks in terms of like a program. It could be argued that the United States is not even a democracy, given all of the methods that the rich make it so that our candidates that have our best interest are never able to be chosen. And it’s a mixture of people not understanding or knowing history with a sprinkling of illiteracy. that we continue to march down the road, choosing the same two parties over and over again, and living in a vacuum. Stuck in time. Repeating the same mistakes. The Yankees in whole both Democrat and Republican are some variation of fascist and relative to the rest of the world the left and right paradigm is more varied. America is a imperialist empire that employs fascist as useful idiots to do the bidding of the business owners and the capitalist class. Democrats just give you the impression that you have a choice. It’s a form of pacification. They themselves can see themselves as powerful and still have faith in the institution. And they themselves can also be alright people, but the ROLE or FUNCTION that they play in all this is just controlled opposition. The more you go down the rabbit hole of world history and American history, you start to see patterns, and really nothing has changed. Like fascism and racism and all these isms are just character traits of societies. But they are symptoms of exponential processes inside of containers that can no longer withstand the flux. That’s how you can have Nazi Jews. Not all Jews are Nazis, but Israelis in general, as a collective, are fascistic in nature. And there shouldn’t be really a debate about this, but a lot of people are ignorant about what it’s like in Israel and how the laws are written. To be honest it’s almost like me. I live in Yankee land. I’m not a fascist. I think I am a minority in my opinions, but there is still a significant amount of people that believe as I do. I mean I can relate to a israeli., who chooses not to be a fascist. It’s such a fucking mess. And at the root of it all, is that people just don’t take interest really in current affairs, in a serious, responsible manner. As a collective, we are very misinformed Population. The Yankee likes to make fun of North Korea, but I think of us like North Korea. Like a mixture of Disneyland and North Korea. You put those two together and I think that’s what it’s like to live in America. But if you never left the country, you don’t realize the rest of the people around the world live better lives. And like, I wouldn’t stay here if I had a choice now that I know more about the world. Like vote Democrat. No thank you. Buy the plain ticket, leave the country forever and never look back. That’s where I’m at.

    • Mustakrakish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Not the same results exactly, more that the dems enable the republicans by not pushing back, but both are far below the standard we should accept.

    • Glide@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Both sides aren’t the same, but their choices produce the same results.

      The last few weeks are clear evidence of the opposite.

      • John@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Kids were still in cages during Biden. Prison slave population still highest history. Biden started the genocide and handed it over to trump. Biden deported more people than trump. Biden didn’t feel like codifing roe. No min wage discussions whatsoever. No universal healthcare. Harris wanted a stronger border than trump and bragged about it. Half of the US can’t even afford a 1 bedroom apartment under Biden and Trump alike.

        The two parties exist to appease their corporate donors. Nothing they do is in your interests.

        By the way, progressive measures passed in many states, even states that Trump won. People want progressive policy but neither party is willing to deliver. This is a feature, not a bug, of capitalism.

        • Glide@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          15 hours ago

          Oh no, I angered the tankies.

          Both parties suck. The world would not be experiencing economic bipolarism, and we would not be spreading memes about American born citizens rotting in prisons in El Salvador just to cope had Trump lost the election. The two parties are not the same.

          • John@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Ohhhhh, the “T” word. Ez block for this uninformed and ignorant troll.

        • BeNotAfraid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          19 hours ago
          1. Kids weren’t being forced back to labour in factories by the CEO of Amazon -see Florida.

          2. State Prison populations logarithmically dwarf federal prison populations, overwhelmingly Red States With Mississippi, Lousiana, Oklahoma, Idaho, Arizona, Texas, Georgia as the magnificent 7. All notoriously with a racial bias. No democrat president would have made the move or received the support necessary to dismantle private prisons at this point in history. What Trump is doing is not legal, you cannot rule by executive order, the judiciary are just all bought or neutered right now.

          3. Biden’s white house was about economic recovery because that was what was most important after Trump racked up the deficit. America enjoyed the lowest impact of inflation with the most economic regrowth of any country in the world after COVID. Things are significantly worse elsewhere. Inflation was going down under Biden, but social media gaslit the nation into believing it was way worse and once again that Trickle down economics would fix it.

          4. Crashing and burning the global economy was Big Tech’s goal, under Biden the judiciary ordered Alphabet to break up Google’s monopoly. It was just too late to happen at that point. No other government gave enough of a shit about our personal privacy and freedom to attempt to break the single largest corporate spy network in the history of existence. The democrats didn’t do everything we wanted them to, that doesn’t mean they didn’t make some very important and historically significant moves.

          5. There was no presidential immunity until the very end of Biden’s presidency at which point he was in noticeable mental decline and there was no supreme court stacked in his favour.

          It’s not black and white, is all I’m saying. The constant self-criticism is what splits the Democratic party, reduces the turnout and allowed corporatism the opening to advantage themselves. We’re lucky Trump still has the energy to rule without having the mental faculties to let others call all the shots. Sometimes, better than literal fascists is enough.

          • Glide@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            15 hours ago

            I respect you for doing it, but the .ml at the end of their name really just means you’re wasting your effort.

            None the less, good on you for fighting the good fight. I’m sick and tired of people pushing powerlessness and apathy under the guise of good will.

            • John@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              7 hours ago

              Pushing powerlessness? What are you doing to stop this? I’m with DSA and fighting IRL to stop this. Have you organized any protests? Have you phone banked anybody? Have you distributed literature? Have you actually gone out and talked with real human beings about what struggles they are feeling?

            • BeNotAfraid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              14 hours ago

              I don’t care to convince them. Every opportunity we have to counter the false narratives meant to divide the working class, is an opportunity for you, myself and everyone else provide our comrades who have not yet woken up to the programming the ability to:

              1. Recognise agents, bad actors and bots.

              2. Give them the tools to counter them and drive home the message of unity. We need to stop playing party politics and realise the struggle has always been up vs down, left vs right is just how the owners of our media push us against eachother.

              Thank you for contributing to the wider conversation.

  • Mouette@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    1 day ago

    Yeah for sure AOC represent Democrats 😂😂😂. They are all behind her and sure will let her run for primary and win like they did with Bernie Sanders. LMAO

    • Lunar_Voyager@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      For all their preaching about the sanctity of democracy they seem willing to do anything to avoid ever having a democratic primary process. The hypocrisy is stunning.

      • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        19 hours ago

        How about repeatedly bringing up the flaws of First past the post voting every election cycle and then doing nothing to solve it in the blue states they control?

        • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I can no longer believe it’s in good faith. These are people with law degrees who pretend to be unaware of why Bush won in 2000. If they don’t explicitly oppose FPTP by now, then they’re pissing on your leg and telling you it’s raining.

        • peregrin5@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          My city implemented ranked choice recently. Progress is being made. Just not as fast as you tankies want because you don’t seem to understand that moving something as large as the United States happens on the scale of decades not months.

    • Hominine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      24 hours ago

      Did Bernie not run in the primary? I remember him having his ass handed to him in my state.

        • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          IMHO it was more Warren splitting Sanders’ vote even though she knew she would lose. The establishment dems wanted Biden.

      • Allonzee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        23 hours ago

        I phone banked for him on his 2 most possible runs. He’s way too old. AOC is the only half decent insider option in all of DC now.

        After a lifetime of voting for the lesser evil to make the ship sink a little slower, voting blue from Kerry to Harris in the general after primarying for the most leftwing candidate available, and feeling dirty every time, either they can give me a candidate that isn’t actively choking as they fellate oligarch dick, or I’ll watch it all burn from home.

        • PointyReality@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          21 hours ago

          I guess from my perspective you still realised they were still the lesser of two evils. You are right the system is fucked and the Democrats did not do enough to change the status quo particularly in terms of correcting the wealth disparity we see now.

          Let’s hope the US actually have a chance at another fair election with a candidate you deserve because as it looks right now everyday the current fascist regime that is Trump administration moves towards a future where you may not get that chance.

          • Hominine@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            14 hours ago

            Democrats simply have no levers to pull to make wholesale changes. I remember Hillary attempting to engage with healthcare reform during her time as First Lady and being pilloried for it. Obama’s administration couldn’t muster nearly enough votes to enact single-payer healthcare and had to opt for a market based solution that just eked through congress, only to be lambasted by the modern left for it.

            Many around these parts act as if Democrats can just enact reforms by fiat and do not answer to a largely centrist, if not conservative, constituency. A cursory examination shows this has never been the case; the center/left has always had to govern via consensus.

            Now “leftists” are eating their own to a degree that leaves me often suspecting that many are little more than poorly disguised MAGA adherents bleating accelerationist nonsense. This thread and any other like it is replete with these moans of surrender, and who can be surprised? Organizing takes much more effort than vomiting into a keyboard and these folks are by and large too lazy to suss out an understanding of recent history, instead choosing to repeat the same canards (see: the conspiracy theory of independent Bernie being cheated in lieu of not being able to come close to winning the Democratic primary.)

      • alcibiades@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        I agree. Both democrats and republicans pledge allegiance to capitalism above all else. This simply is not sustainable.

        This is also why education and historical literacy is so important. If more people knew how that America is only successful because of (majority) socialist policies like the New Deal and Great Society then there will be more widespread support for a reinvigoration of them.

        I think legacy media and centralized social media have dumbed down our populace to a point that they don’t even realize there is a way out. Everyone in the 99% stands to benefit from radical change.

      • gregs_gumption@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        24 hours ago

        What percentage of the American population are progressive? Please provide a reliable source for your information. And please don’t provide something nebulous and without meaning like “75% of Americans support random progressive policy”. Those polls show aggrement with a policy, not a desire to change current policy.

        • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Ok

          https://www.dataforprogress.org/polling-the-left-agenda

          https://www.levyinstitute.org/publications/trump-wins-while-americans-vote-for-progressive-policies/

          https://www.citizen.org/news/progressive-policies-are-popular-policies/

          https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2019/03/27/majority-of-americans-support-progressive-policies-such-as-paid-maternity-leave-free-college.html

          https://yipinstitute.org/article/analyzing-popularity-of-progressive-views

          While several moderate Democrats accused and blamed progressives like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez for the loss of 12 seats in the House of Representatives and the Warnock/Ossoff ticket being the deciding factor for the fate of the Senate, all House Democratic candidates in swing districts who endorsed Medicare for All had won their races, with none of the incumbent Democrats who lost their reelection supporting it. In addition, only one of the 93 co-sponsors of the Green New Deal lost to their challenger. This brings up the question: Are progressive ideas actually popular? Did progressives actually win last year?

          Throughout the campaigning process for the 2020 election, Republicans focused hard to smear and misrepresent their Democratic opponents using terminology like “socialism,” “radical,” and “defund the police” to define them. One would think that these more progressive policies only appeal to the younger generation of Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren supporters. But, newer research conducted reveals surprising results.

          An Ipsos poll showed that, in 2020, 46% of Republicans and 72% of Democrats would support a universal basic income of $1000 per month (some may remember this being a distinctive characteristic during Andrew Yang’s candidacy). A study by Pew Research Center indicated that a majority of Americans, and especially lower class Republicans, agree with raising the minimum wage to $15 per hour. Even in the battleground state of Florida, which went to Donald Trump in 2020, passed this same measure on their ballot with 61% of voter support. On Election Day, Fox News aired results of their voter analysis exit poll. One finding was that 72% of participants either somewhat or strongly favor a government-run health care plan, with 29% in opposition. Another 72% of viewers responded that they are somewhat to very concerned about climate change’s effects, having 28% disagreeing. Finally, 70% favor increasing spending toward renewable energy, with 31% against it. Results to other questions summarized that a majority of respondents want the government to do more, think racism is a serious problem in the U.S., support a pathway to citizenship for illegal immigrants, and want the Supreme Court’s decision in Roe v Wade to be left as is. A poll by Student Defense, the Defend Students Action Fund, and Data for Progress revealed that 67% of those who participated “support some form of widespread student loan forgiveness - whether it is universal, tied to income, or based on specific program eligibility,” with 58% of Republicans among that support (Forbes).

        • crusa187@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          23 hours ago

          More than you’d think are progressive. But, I’m not claiming we need a progressive party - anything left of center is better than what the Democrats offer.

        • WraithGear@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          23 hours ago

          I don’t care how many people are progressive, at this point it’s the only thing i will vote for. I saw how the Democratic Party acted after losing, and i am talking about all of it, not just pathetic signs and admonishing people speaking truth to power. I will not vote for establishment again no matter what the options are.

          • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            22 hours ago

            I don’t care how many people are progressive, at this point it’s the only thing i will vote for.

            Yeah, that’s about what I expect from Lemmy leftists.

        • Hominine@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          23 hours ago

          This is the crux of it, American’s have shown us time and again they are centrist/center left at best. These folks are so trapped in their ideological bubbles that they cannot fathom their extreme outlier position, small wonder that there is so much accelerationist language of late.
          Compromise is taboo and so any candidate that has agitated inside the system for change ends up verboten.

  • Allonzee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    24 hours ago

    MTG is far more welcome in her party than AOC is in hers.

    The neoliberal DNC sees the Republicans as their esteemed opposition, as they are on the same take and have the same orders on Economic policy. They see spoilers like AOC, who are not on the corpo bribe train and for profound economic policy changes, as their enemy.

    https://apnews.com/article/business-nancy-pelosi-congress-8685e82eb6d6e5b42413417f3d5d6775

    https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2021/04/15/nancy-pelosi-alexandria-ocasio-cortez-481704

    The Democrats, almost all of them save a couple of spoilers, aren’t the fascists themselves, but they’ve spent the last half century enabling the fascists. The Democrats don’t care about entire industries of confidence schemes murdering Americans like our deathcare industry, they don’t care about poor kids getting a good education, and they dont care about millions of our most betrayed neighbors dying in the streets. As the bad cop Fascists brag about how much they love the schaudenfreude of the pain those people are in, the good cop neoliberals shrug “free market forces, sorry! But I do affirm your identity, homeless dying/lifesaving healthcare denied person!”

    That’s why there really isn’t hope until we collapse, hopefully by our hands in revolution and not by oligarch made climate change in a couple decades. Best, best, best, best case scenario, we have a real election in 3. 5 years and the Neoliberals gain power, do NOTHING to reign in the oligarchs, income inequity, or our sociopathic, murderous capital markets as they’re gleefully paid not to do. Fascism is the takeover of the state to serve big capital’s need for ever moar, and so the table will remain set to go back on the fascist march in just another 4 years.