I ask because I like console, but at the same time have difficulties remembering all the commands. I’d like to try a GUI that is comfortable to use with only a keyboard.
[edit]
My inbox got fediversized, fantastic feeling.

    • BentiGorlich@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      I am using it too and I love it. I only know source tree as a competitor and in comparision it sucks…

      You dont have to pay for it, even when using it comercially (unpess they changed that)

      • Modal@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        It has a “free evaluation” that I think can be as long as you want it to be / honor system.
        Its been worth it to me to pick up a license and support the development though. Its reasonably priced (for a dev tool) / no subscription and definitely beats the free clients I was using before (Sourcetree/GithubDesktop).

    • Kaldo@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Came here to recommend it too, really neat and practical tool and I haven’t found a better alternative yet. Honestly I don’t know why are people so against GUI git tools, it makes visualizing branches and commits so much more easier. I don’t think you can use it only with your keyboard as OP asked though, dunno how important that is to them.

  • exu@feditown.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 years ago

    Magit with emacs (doom emacs to be fully honest). More a TUI, but definitely fully keyboard driven :)

    • dolle
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Same here. I don’t even use emacs for development anymore (I use IntelliJ since all my work is on the JVM and Typescript) but I still have an emacs running in the background for magit and org-mode. Magit is insanely effective for performing complex rebasing and cherry-picking tasks.

  • CosmicBlend@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 years ago

    I used to use SourceTree but it runs horribly and switched to Fork years ago and never looked back. I use VSCode for merge conflict resolution.

  • Djoot
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 years ago

    Lazygit changed how I use git, it is so easy to do all the daily essentials like branching, committing, and merging, but also also does more advanced things like interactive rebasing when needed.

    I had searched for a proper git client, that was free and open source plus worked on both Linux and Windows, for a long time and I haven’t looked back after finding lazygit.

  • boo one@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 years ago

    Apart from the cli, gitk and git-gui are plenty good in my opinion, they could always be made better. And they are mostly always there with git Only thing I am miasing now is blame.

  • corytheboyd@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    These days I can run everything I need to with the git cli. I use the JetBrains visual merge tool to resolve conflicts, because doing that by hand is so awfully error prone, it very very intuitively maps to a visual process

  • fidodo@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 years ago

    No, I find typing faster than clicking and I’ve been using git for so long the commands are second nature to me.

    • Chrissie@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      What I prefer most about an UI is the better sense of overview over the repository and it’s branches.

      I find, when compared to people I’ve worked with that prefer plain git, that I’m much quicker at finding certain changes or seeing what is in which branch with GitExtensions.

  • s_w@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    I use IntelliJ’s built-in git GUI.

    I don’t understand why people use command line only. Sure, learn the commands so if you need to use them you can, but most GUIs are far more feature rich than command line. With IntelliJ, I can easily view differences before committing, have it do code quality scans, automatically clean up any code it can, more easily choose which files I want to commit vs the typical ‘git add .’ I see most people do with command line, have separate changelists when pair programming, and much more.

    One argument that continually comes up is that command line is faster. I completely disagree. If I want to just commit the code without reviewing it, I can use 2 hot keys and the code is committed and pushed. But as I do a quick readthrough of all the code first and review issues from the code quality analysis it does take more time, but still less than it would to do comparable things with command line.

    • pinkpatrol@anarch.is
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’m a heavy intellij user, but the git log UI always confuses me. When I open ‘git log’ via the action menu IntelliJ doesn’t focus my current branch. I am not sure if there’s some other menu I’m supposed to use to achieve that.

      I do use the commit local changes, pull changes, merge branches functionality a good bit. My only feedback there is that I haven’t found a way to quickly commit changes without running git hooks. Each time it requires me to open up the gear icon and deselect ‘git hooks’. This is slower than using the command line where I can write git commit --no-verify and repeat the same command again and again. I know it’s a niche need, but it’s necessary for testing a rather archaic system we maintain.

  • vraylle@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I actually like the tooling built into VS Code. Added the GitHub Pull Requests and Issues extension for the PRs, pretty happy with it all at the moment. Before that I like a specific older version of SourceTree that didn’t forget your credentials.

  • Orvanis@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    TortoiseGit user here. Love that it integrates with Windows Explorer so I don’t have to constantly be opening an app first to fire off some Git commands.

  • danknodes@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    VS 2022 is finally somewhat usable for Git using the git Changes pane. The whole team uses it this way, and for many of them it’s a first for git as well.

  • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    “No. No, man. Shit, no, man. I believe you’d get your ass kicked, sayin’ somethin’ like that, man.” - Office Space

    That said and jokes aside, occasionally I’ll use the integrated git in vscode. I do recommend a Git cheat sheet to help become more proficient with the CLI interface.

    Atlassian Github Git Cheatsheet: Changed to the Github version as the Atlassian one was an auto-downloading PDF.

    • solariplex@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I use it as well! Not sure if it’s a flatpak thing, but for some reason I need to re-enter credentials for my git remotes for each push. What’s your experience?