• Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    163
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the propaganda I can get behind.

    And with trolleybuses powered on a renewable grid, it’s zero gallons!

    • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      80
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Or maybe tell bosses that if your job can be done remotely it should be done remotely. Then there’s more room on the bus for people who need to be in meatspace to do their jobs.

          • Dojan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            As much as I enjoy wanton violence for the ruling elite, a good start would be threatening the politicians with this unless they implement laws that make it unprofitable to force people into offices.

            It should be codified that if a job can be performed remotely, it ought be, with the voluntary option to have people go to offices and such.

      • Wrench Wizard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I wish I didn’t need hands for my job, 90% of it is brain work with a tinker here and there. I see so many videos of robotic hands being used for things and can’t wait for the day I can just send one of these out to a site equipped with some tools and just remotely tap into the video stream. It’s coming and I don’t think it will be too long. Hell, I’m just a layman and if you gave me a dedicated year and some funding I could get something viable up to par so I’m sure it’s possible, guess it just won’t profit anyone enough to sell it yet.

    • Buffalox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      We used to have trolleybuses when I was a kid in the 70’s, they were so insanely much more nice to ride than a diesel. No bad smell, and they were smooth and quiet.

      I guess we will get back to something similar soon, but with batteries.

        • Buffalox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes in some aspects, it’s like we are moving backwards. Funny since the talk about environment is more serious now than back then, still we often use unnecessarily polluting solutions, where the older “too expensive” solutions were viable when we had way less money as a country than we have now?

          One would have thought the oil crisis had made us keep the trolley busses?

    • odium@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      While I agree with the comparison in the post, the trolleybus powered by renewable energy shouldn’t be compared to gas cars.

      It should be compared to electric cars powered by renewable energy.

      • Lutz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I disagree, the bus is still replacing the purpose of the gas cars. The bus should just be compared to both gas and electric cars.

      • Player2@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        It is easier and cheaper to make one larger electric vehicle than 68 smaller ones, and they would damage the road less too. Of course this kind of comparison between two different things is inherently very difficult to do fairly

      • uis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Trolleybuses are much lighter, cheaper and reliable than regular electric bus or car. Also: a car is still a car.

        • odium@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ik that ttolleybuses are better than electric cars in carbon footprint, traffic, etc. I’m just proposing that we compare things with the same power source together. It makes more impact to say that an electric trolley is x% better on y metric compared to electric cars, than to say they are x% better than gas cars.

          Imagine a situation where you say electric trolleybuses are superior to gas cars for reasons x, y, and z on xcretion or speddit. Then some elon musk bootlicker or big oil bootlicker replies to you saying “what about electric cars” or “what about gas buses”? You craft a meticulous reply about why gas buses are better than electric cars. But it’s too late. Thousands of lurkers saw the bootlicker’s reply to you but will never see your rebuttal. Many of them are now more against public transportation.

      • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        How are buses still not better? The ratio of individual people being moved to total mass being moved is better. The maintenance and insurance fees are collective. The driver of the bus is a trained professional vs some rando commuter.

      • moitoi@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nope, a car electric or not creates multiple issues like urbanism, pollution (i.e: noise, visual, microplastics), hotspots, hostiles environment like parking lots, increase deaths rates, consequences on flooding, etc.

        A lot of them can be solved with public transportation.

    • Aux@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      New electric buses in London are fucking amazing, no need for trolleys.

      • uberrice@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Until in 5-10 years when the batteries are fucked.

        That’s the beautiful thing about trolley buses - they do not need a (substantial) battery. They are basically trains on wheels.

        There are some places where battery powered buses make sense - for example, where I live, lucerne Switzerland, there is one bus line that just goes up and down a rather steep hill. By using recuperative braking, the battery powered bus is super efficient. For other, normal ‘high traffic’ lines, trolley makes so much more sense

        • Aux@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Trolleys don’t really make any sense. I come from Riga, it has a lot of trolleys and the city is designed around trolleys and trams. And yet modern trolleys have bloody diesel engines, because being permanently hooked to the wire makes no sense at all. It’s much better to have electric buses with a few overhead wires here and there to fast charge on the go.

          • uberrice@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Lucerne has a few trolley lines. They are ONLY trolley buses. The long, 3 Segment ones. Then, some 1 Segment hybrid buses that have pantagraphs. At the end of those lines, there is a longer stop where the trolley lines end, the pantagraph gets pulled down and the bus trucks along the last few stations with diesel.

            Then theres just normal hybrid buses for more rural lines, and a battery operated bus that goes up and down a hill.

            There’s a solution for every line - you just need the proper infrastructure. The reason that we have this great pantagraph-compatible infrastructure is that, while there are a lot of trains in Switzerland, there is no metro. So in lucerne, the trolley buses work almost as a metro, with the main lines having buses every 7 minutes.

          • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            … why not have as many cables as possible so you can simply minimize battery size? Trolleybuses are just more efficient battery buses.

        • uis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago
          1. Dormitory day before morning shift
          • Example: Moscow metro, national railway
          1. Night shift
          • Example: major city, national railway
          1. PMV
          • Example: a city
          1. Car
          • Example: shithole without public transit

          To be fair 1 person using car is not 450 people that could use a car. To be fair at most 20% of people have a car in heavily car-centric cities. In good cities it hangs in single-digit.

        • moitoi@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          At some point, public transport had housing nearby the depots. Employees could walk or bicycle to the workplace.

          Then some douchebag neoliberal thinking @&€#!?/((+ thought it was privilege and that it has to be cut…

  • Drun@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ah, you should see buses in my city. Dirty, thirty years old, overpopulated graves on wheels with no air conditioners.

    Never again.

    • 𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒏@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That one bus company in the nearby city that absolutely refuses to replace their miserable old buses 🥴🤡 while the others run modern air conditioned hybrids, and some fully electric

          • kurosawaa@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Multiple bus companies can be a good thing if done well. The busses in Taiwan are also privatized and the service is quite good. In Japan even the metro and rail networks compete in a private market.

            When you privatize a company and make it a monopoly though you get the worst of both worlds.

          • Serdan@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Having to buy different tickets for bus lines sounds miserable. Wtf.

    • jerkface@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Thirty years old is a perfectly reasonable age for a big chunk of a city’s fleet. You’re still talking kneeling busses.

    • uis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      with no air conditioners.

      Dear Faust. Are they using Soviet minibuses?

  • Rambler@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Recently visited York (UK) and they have a fantastic bus system - and they’re electric.

    • Nioxic@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Busses in my city are also going electric. So far only the local routes. The longer distance routes are still diesel

    • Jeanschyso@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      1 year ago

      Imagine how bad it would be without the tube and busses! All these people trying to drive in London? Just thinking about it I shudder and I’ve never even seen London.

    • severspade@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      According to a study conducted in 1000 cities in 50 countries based on data from connected vehicles and phones. Not disagreeing with the premise but I expect there are plenty of other more “congested” cities, visit Manila or Jakarta for example. The UK should however definitely do more to fund its public infrastructure.

    • aracebo@unilem.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not all sources agree on that. Also, I can think of a way or two to eliminate all traffic congestion.

      • Lime66@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        At least in my experience most of the traffic is people trying to go into London from commuter towns, and they’ll take the motorways not the streets

  • danielfgom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    It makes a good point but only if your country actually has public transport.

    If you live somewhere with zero public transport, the car is your only option.

    • Katana314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      You make a good point but only if your country actually has roads.

      If you live somewhere with no paved roads and only railroads, then that and walking are your only options.

      (Sarcasm but I’m curious if you see the point)

        • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well yes, except all the railroads where removed. Just lifted trucks and gravel roads as far as the eye can see.

      • Lemminary@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You make a good point but only if your country has people.

        If you live somewhere with no people and only animals, then you can’t get anywhere and must traverse the jungle with a machete and a canteen full of either rainwater or your own piss.

    • Vespair@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you live somewhere, you’re a part of the body that decides things like that. If you want public transit in your community, and you certainly should, take the steps to get the action started.

      Nobody is going to change the world on our behalf; it all falls on us.

      • mapleseedfall@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Whats one of the concrete steps? I don’t know where you lives but here it seems impossible to push for that.

        • Vespair@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Starts by being an active member of the community. Attend counsel meetings, town hearings, etc. Bring up the topic at these, gauge the response. Talk to the people who seem enthusiastic in response. Work together and build a petition, then seek signatures first amongst the people who attend, then talk to your neighbors.

          I never said it was going to be easy, I only said nobody else is going to do it on your behalf.

    • XiELEd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      That’s why the post advocates for public transport. So that we can have better options.

  • nogrub@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    but this isn’t new technology where you can write a 100 bullshit news article about and prais it as the next big thing because it actually works and is efficient

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    The correct answer actually should -and could- be 0 gallons if they simply cycle to work. Granted, that requires them to have the right infrastructure available, but if (once) that existed, the vast majority of the work force could cycle to work happily. Most people don’t live 20 miles or more from where they work

    • cogman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It could also be 0 gallons if the busses are electrified, or if the rail system is expanded, or if we stop pushing office workers to commute every day.

      There are many routes to 0 emissions.

      • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh sure.

        I’m just sayjt that we need to change the way we live. Like you said, people should not be required to work in offices anymore. If they physically need to be at locations, let them walk for short distances, cycle for medium distances and use public transportation for large distances.

        Most cities in the world have been redesigned over the past 80 years for cars. It’s insane and it left most cities awful places to live in. Almost all Dutch cities have been redesigned for people. So people walk and cycle because they can, and the cities look and feel amazing and beautiful.

    • WereCat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sure, I’d love to cycle 56km to and from work each day. Especially right after a night shift.

      We should just invent portals already.

      • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        56 kms is far, indeed. Thsts what you make public transportation for. Trains, busses.

        Well done, the would be more comfortable and faster than a car.

        However, I did 25 kms to and from every day. Took me 45 minutes and it was super healthy

        • XiELEd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          45 minutes is a long time near nightfall, though… Honestly I’d rather take a bus at 5PM, even at 12km, since there are other people and it feels much safer.

    • totallynotarobot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      How many gallons does the ambulance take to get the cyclist to the hospital after the hit and run?

      (Seriously tho bicycles ftw except in winter)

      • Nouveau_Burnswick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Winter cycling is awesome*, I can finally get to work without being sweety.

        *Winter experience is highly dependent on how well your area does SNIC

      • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Less, probably, because cycling in on itself is safer than driving a car. Lower speeds, less mass, less injuries.

        Also, winter cycling.is awesome

        • totallynotarobot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I was being facetious; ambulance fuel use is a silly comparison :)

          Listening to all y’all winter cyclists I lament that I live in a city where the bike lanes are where the city piles up the snow it plows off the car lanes on the streets. RIP me. It gives me hope and happiness to know that there are cities that don’t do this!

          • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah those would be cities that see bikes as children’s toys instead of what they are: a better form of medium range transit