by Centurii-chan

  • Pilon23
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Very interesting! I never thought of that before. On the building pictured, which would take least effort to double the storage space - making it twice as long, wide or tall?

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Do you really mean “effort” (and if so, whose?) or do you mean cost? The other reply is correct that making it twice as long would minimize the need to redesign, but without doing the math (I am a civil engineer, but I can’t be bothered) I suspect making it twice as tall would use the least additional materials and therefore be cheapest. (That assumes taking advantage of the extra height for storage is the client’s problem, not the engineer’s. Having to put in a second story floor would change things.)

      • Pilon23
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yeah I guess I was thinking about cost when I said effort. I figured maybe building up would also provide more design challenges to keep the thing from collapsing, or is that negligible?

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          21 hours ago

          You’ll have a little bit more wind loading and you may have to put in a little bit of thought into the size and bracing of the vertical support columns to make sure the extra length doesn’t risk buckling, but that’s pretty much it.