

I’m on Lemmy because Reddit devs are letting their AI auto-ban their more intelligent users. Isn’t that similar to letting Telsa’s auto-drive into an auto-accident?
Making friends and caring for them. Writer at the intersection of technology, ethics, education, and imaginative futures. aka MagnetoMancer
I’m on Lemmy because Reddit devs are letting their AI auto-ban their more intelligent users. Isn’t that similar to letting Telsa’s auto-drive into an auto-accident?
🤷♂️Ah, policies come and go…like the wind, right?😉Maybe the smarter thing we can do, until they get their priorities in line with ours, is to put up our own wind turbines, or whatever else is more abundant, and don’t ask anybody to bill us. 💪⚡✊
Yes, females are at least half our nation’s thinking power. Lets do all we can to bring these girls up to speed and restore balance to the force.
If it is something to believe in, then it is not Science.
I don’t mind training AI to give everyone smarter answers. It just seems the more civic, community minded, thing to do. BUT, what I want is a % of the revenue they make selling my metadata, and a list of who they sold it to.
Not sure if all the advanced reasoning in the world can actually find missing information, can it? So, at best, it can only make an educated leap of logic across the gap of information. But shouldn’t people be first alerted that such gaps have been found, and then make a call of action to find it? Otherwise, it just seems making up missing info is only going to generate the same kind of questionable material we are trying to get rid of. Wouldn’t it be smarter to just use more caution? Forget auto-deletion (too much like “auto-drive”), just highlight (or lowlight) the questionable material, AND then maybe copy it over to its own “Encyclopedia of Errors A-Z”. Just my idea. But, what do you think?
Compare with Zangi Private Messenger. Yes, every country who has jurisdiction has access. Just ask yourself, which gov do I trust more with my private chats?