Not sure if all the advanced reasoning in the world can actually find missing information, can it? So, at best, it can only make an educated leap of logic across the gap of information. But shouldn’t people be first alerted that such gaps have been found, and then make a call of action to find it? Otherwise, it just seems making up missing info is only going to generate the same kind of questionable material we are trying to get rid of. Wouldn’t it be smarter to just use more caution? Forget auto-deletion (too much like “auto-drive”), just highlight (or lowlight) the questionable material, AND then maybe copy it over to its own “Encyclopedia of Errors A-Z”. Just my idea.
But, what do you think?
Not sure if all the advanced reasoning in the world can actually find missing information, can it? So, at best, it can only make an educated leap of logic across the gap of information. But shouldn’t people be first alerted that such gaps have been found, and then make a call of action to find it? Otherwise, it just seems making up missing info is only going to generate the same kind of questionable material we are trying to get rid of. Wouldn’t it be smarter to just use more caution? Forget auto-deletion (too much like “auto-drive”), just highlight (or lowlight) the questionable material, AND then maybe copy it over to its own “Encyclopedia of Errors A-Z”. Just my idea. But, what do you think?
To fill gaps in information, one must first identify the gaps. Then one must prioritize. (King Tut’s address is missing on a lot of forms.)