No, TSMC is not supposed to be a permanent solution. Just Arrow Lake.

This would be an excellent law/regulation that makes complete sense.

The major companies can most definitely manage this (although they will cry crocodile tears).

That’s definitely true.

The rested on their lawrels when they were the only game in town from the late 2000s to ~2018.

Considering the price, I would assume it’s likely 64GB (maybe 128 GB).

That would not be a good thing. The CPU/GPU design and semiconductor fab industries are already massively concentrated.

You don’t understand the terms “censorship” or “free speech”. It’s a mere internet polemic for you, something to act out about .

You have no clue what you are talking about.

I think you need to cancel your citizenship (and your family members’ citizenships) and move to russia or PRC.

Any high level thoughts regarding Radxa vs. RaspberryPi.

The only non RaspberryPi SBC that I’ve used was a version of the ASUS TinkerBoard, it was marginally better than the 3B version I had previously (latest one at the time).

And the vast majority of russians couldn’t care less.

EU is a bit too passive and cautious when it comes to compliance with internal rules.

One would think that after they opened up access to Shengen to any russians, they would have been immediately kicked out.

Not all surprising, he’s been pushing the russian narrative for a while now.

Cheers! Thanks for the heads up!

We’ll probably get there in 10-15 years (as in at mainstream, mass market prices).

Don’t know how it is in the US, but you don’t get any support for Pixel where I live.

Samsung on the other hand is excellent, they even have retail locations.

Interesting solution with multi SBC/motherboards.

There are pros/cons to anonymous payments. It’s a bit sophomoric to claim privacy is impossible without anonymous payments.

There are most definitely many use cases for .onion sites without any sort of payments (“anonymous” or otherwise).

Monero support is a massive red flag for criminal activity, even by the very low standards of crypto.

I didn’t really get this either.

I did think the final paragraph was notable, a “zeitgeist of our times” if you will:

The absurdity of the situation prompted tech author and journalist James Vincent to write on X, “current tech trends are resistant to satire precisely because they satirize themselves. a car park of empty cars, honking at one another, nudging back and forth to drop off nobody, is a perfect image of tech serving its own prerogatives rather than humanity’s.”

I just find the notion that all CoC policies are useless in all cases to be a bit broad and almost parochial.

There can be cases in a multi-cultural collective where a CoC helps everyone get on the same page.

A CoC can also act as a “policy of last resort” where you generally have a more laissez-faire approach, but you can refer to the CoC policy if someone repeatedly doesn’t get the message.

It all depends on the context of course, but staying that CoC policies are universally bad seems very simplistic.

I see where you are coming from, but to me it comes off as a little bit naive and reductionist.

That being said, I am thinking of this more globally, not necessarily solely in context of open source development (let alone this case in particular).