On a technical level, how is TikTok being blocked/banned in the US?

Can I still sideload the app to my phone? Is it only being banned from the two big app stores? Is there a penalty for being found in possession of the software on US soil?

  • GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    7 hours ago

    No app store download and no hosting in the u.s. Even if they weren’t blocking u s. Users the amount of video traffic suddenly hitting their servers outside the country would cripple their infrastructure and seriously hinder other Internet traffic. Since net neutrality doesn’t exist anymore, ISPs can be paid to block it or seriously cripple it.

    Still totally legal to install the app and access the content. However the same content will be reposted to other platforms which will be a great passive revenue stream for someone.

  • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I believe I read that the ban prohibited new downloads but wouldn’t stop existing users from continuing to use, however the parent company kinda put a middle finger up and said they would stop service in the US completely, probably by IP/geofencing? Take with grain of salt.

    • modus@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      So are American ISPs being forced to block TikTok’s server’s IPs?

      • gens@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        It will probably be removed from DNS (and appstores). Google IANA , and DNS if you want to know more.

        PS Ofc the company itself will stop its services. It’s not like they want beef with a whole country (any, not just US).

      • adarza@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        15 hours ago

        afaik the legislation doesn’t include active blocking of a qualifying service’s (which includes tiktok by name, but is not limited to only it or bytedance) traffic…

        it only prohibits the distribution of their ‘apps’ (such as via google/apple ‘stores’)–this is the part that does most the heavy lifting, and hosting of their services within the u.s.

      • cm0002@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        15 hours ago

        No, US is not blocking it (there isn’t even infrastructure in place for such a request, we don’t have a “Great Firewall of China”)

        However, the VPN is required because reportedly TikTok themselves will stop allowing US based users to see content which is above and beyond what the law calls for

          • neomachino@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Good thing we live a country with plenty of good honorable ISPs. Xfinity, Verizon and uhh… What’s that other one that offers 10mbps for $200/m?

      • Porto881@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        I dont think any ISP will be forced to given that both the current and next WH have said they won’t enforce a ban. If it goes dark, it’ll be TikTok themselves blocking access

        Edit: called it

  • Steve@communick.news
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I believe Google and Apple are to be fined if they don’t remove the app from their stores.

    We don’t have the ability to nationally block the domains and IPs, so current users will still be able to access it. So you shouldn’t need a VPN.

    Android users could side load the app if they want.

      • Steve@communick.news
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 hours ago

        On Android you can download apps (.APK files) from the web, and install them without any app store.

        • Steve@communick.news
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Not quite. You don’t need any app store at all.
          You literally download an APK file from a website or anywhere, then install it directly. Could even be a friend with a thumb drive. Doesn’t matter how you get it, it’s just a file.

          • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Yeah. Dont do that. Its how you install viruses.

            Install through another app store like fdroid. Its the secure way to get APKs

            • Steve@communick.news
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 hours ago

              That’s got nothing to do with what sideloading means.

              And the risks are very overblown.
              While it’s possible, it’s extremely rare.

              Mostly because the potent target pool is so small. Bigger potentials for bad guys if they trick app stores into approving trojan horse apps, because everyone think app stores are safer.

    • lurch (he/him)@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      We don’t have the ability to nationally block the domains and IPs

      I disagree. It may be able to circumvent it, but US ISPs could configure their DNS servers to not resolve the domains and their routers to drop packages from and to these IPs. It will affect everyone who uses their ISPs default config for DNS and not uses VPN/Tor, which is a lot of people.

      The question is: Is there a legal procedure to do that? For malware they are sometimes doing things like that (seizing botnet control domains etc), but tiktok isn’t officially malware, AFAIK.

      • Steve@communick.news
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        This isn’t North Korea.
        Even China and Russia can’t fully block things.
        Our networks aren’t nearly as controlled as theirs.

    • Nougat@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Public DNS servers hosted in the US will get notified to delist the domain or direct it to an alternate IP. ISPs will get notified to route IP traffic elsewhere.

          • borari@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Yeah, I do to. We’re not talking about theoretically blocking access to a site nation wide. We’re talking about the TikTok ban, which doesn’t stipulate any sort of network blocking, it’s just a delisting from the app stores.

            The government has never required dns providers to remove records for a domain, or required ISPs to null route traffic to IPs. That’s almost certainly a First Amendment issue, and I can only imagine that such an order would be immediately challenged in court.

            • Nougat@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              14 hours ago

              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_censorship_in_the_United_States

              Trading with the Enemy Act (TWEA)

              In March 2008, the New York Times reported that a blocklist published by the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), an agency established under the Trading with the Enemy Act 1917 and other federal legislation, included websites, so that US companies are prohibited from doing business with those websites and must freeze their assets. The blocklist had the effect that US-based domain name registrars must block those websites. According to the article, eNom, a private domain name registrar and Web hosting company operating in the US, disables domain names that appear on the blocklist.[38] It described eNom’s disabling of a European travel agent’s web sites advertising travel to Cuba, which appeared on the list.[39] According to the report, the US government claimed that eNom was “legally required” to block the websites under US law, even though the websites were not hosted in the US, were not targeted at US persons, and were legal under foreign law.

              As far as null routing IPs, we’ll see.

              • borari@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                14 hours ago

                We won’t see, it’s never happened and isn’t a requirement in the ban bill.

                Read the cited article in Wikipedia. https://web.archive.org/web/20170407043030/https://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/04/us/04bar.html eNom didn’t block DNS users from resolving the domains, they were the registrar for the domains. The domain owners were paying eNom to list their records. As soon as the domain owners moved to a different DNS provider, anyone in the US would be able to access the sites again, even users using eNom public dns servers (if they exist idk).

                You didn’t cite a case of the US blocking DNS providers from resolving a domain, you cited a case of the US blocking a registrar from doing business with an entity on a blocklist published by OFAC.

        • Nougat@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          14 hours ago

          To be fair, it wouldn’t be every ISP that would reroute, just backbone ones. Their routing tables would filter down to regional and last mile networks.

    • adarza@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      he wouldn’t be able to, anyway.

      the deadline is the sunday the 19th. monday the 20th is mlk day (federal holiday, courthouses closed. ag couldn’t file proceedings to enforce the legislation) and the last morning of the biden administration. diaperking is then in charge. even though it was his idea to begin with, he’s flopped on the issue.

  • Fugtig Fisk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I believe thar they said in the news here in Europe, that any service that distributes the tok tok app to the USA market, will be fined $5000 per download!

    It will not be illegal to have but it won’t be updated in the US market and new users won’t be able to download it

  • telescopius@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    15 hours ago

    The US servers are being shut off because they don’t want to risk the fines even though the current administration said they wouldn’t enforce them. TikTok will go black for us users tomorrow. I’m sure there will some way around it for those dedicated enough to find it but the average user will lose access on 1/19.

  • slazer2au@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Generally the large ISP will receive an order to sinkhole the tt domains for their users. And most normal people use a modem supplied by the ISP it will use the ISP DNS server or their phones will use the mobile providers DNS servers.

    It will not block a determined person but it will effectively block it for a large chunk of the US internet.

    • neomachino@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Man I wish I invested in some VPN stock a few years ago. I’m sure they’ll be making a killing with all the us porn bans and now this.

  • Joncash2@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    15 hours ago

    The US won’t block it, but it will be blocked. Tik Tok itself said it will turn off it’s servers and block US ips like it did with India.

    https://edition.cnn.com/2025/01/17/politics/tiktok-ban-supreme-court/index.html

    So it will be tik tok itself enforcing the ban. Which is hilarious. USA showed all this bravado and now has to turn around and beg tik tok to return. I fully expect in the long run tik tok will be sold to Chinese agent Elon Musk and be turned into the spy apparatus US claims it to be. The whole situation shows what a clown USA is.

      • Joncash2@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        How should I know? But you have Biden insisting he won’t enforce the law and Trump promising he’ll stop the ban and make sure tik tok stays. He’s even inviting their CEO to his inauguration. On the other hand it’s tik tok threatening to shutdown now if they don’t fix it sooner. It’s a strange turn of events but I have no idea why USA thinks begging is the appropriate move.

        I mean seriously, if you want an answer ask the US government why all the important people like both presidents are begging. It’s not me making this decision.

        Edit

        Don’t take my word for it. Here’s an article by the rolling stones magazine on it and how all the important people are scrambling to save tik tok. No joke, I’d like someone to explain why all these important people care.

        https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/biden-dems-tiktok-ban-1235239244/