• solsangraal@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    185
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    1 day ago

    i can’t help but think that if your first date with someone is drive thru mcdonalds, maybe that should have been the first clue

    • doctorskull@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      59
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      My first date with my girlfriend was at a Wendy’s and we took the bus to get there. That was 2005. We got married in 2009 and just celebrated our 15th wedding anniversary. It doesn’t matter where you go or how much you spend, it just matters who you’re there with.

      • Riskable@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        How many times did they say, “Sir, this is a Wendy’s” before they just gave up and let you stay all the way until you got married there?

    • ubergeek@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I dunno. McDs was mine and my spouse’s first date, after church.

      We are married 27 years now…

      • DrSteveBrule@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        19 hours ago

        I’m barely older than you’re marriage but McDonald’s was a very different vibe when I was a kid. I still wouldn’t say anything to shame people going to McDonald’s for a first date today.

    • 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      76
      arrow-down
      40
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      If your first date is a glorious scam heist, the future looks promising

      Maybe don’t order carnist options though

        • NJSpradlin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          35
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          1 day ago

          Was their comment one of those ‘self-identifying without being asked’ moments? Certainly feels stereotypical to me. But, it couldn’t be that obvious.

            • 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              22 hours ago

              The animals have no rights and no liberty.

              Why?

              Evolutionary niche

              On the one hand, the breeding of animals dependent on humans destroys evolutionary niches for animals independent from humans, on the other hand, humans destroy evolutionary niches directly.

              Farmers won’t release or breed animals to improve their evolutionary niche, because farmers and consumers don’t farm animals for conservatory reasons.

            • Sunshine (she/her)@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 day ago

              That’s not entirely true because there are expectations depending on the jurisdiction on the standard of care for animals, in several countries they’re legally seen as sentient beings not property.

              Putting them in filthy crowded slaughter houses where they’re kicked and shoved only to be slaughtered as children relative to their life spans is not doing them favour. It is our responsibility to stop exploiting them.

      • Zoidsberg@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        Nuggies are breaded, not just meat, so this is omnivorous not carnist.

        • Resonosity@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Usually vegans use the term carnist to represent those who engage in animal products full stop, rather than breaking down the difference into carnivore and omnivore.

          To us vegans, whether you’re carnivore or omnivore results in the same outcomes. Plus, many conversations surrounding veganism don’t necessarily involve diets, such as with clothing, in which case again it’s easier to use a single term to describe everything non-vegan.

          You might say that non-vegans is a good enough term to describe the above, but that kind of framing can paint carnists in a more benevolent light that acknowledges their freedom of choice, rather than framing carnists with regards to the outcomes they cause, and the victims that suffer because of them.

        • 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Carnism

          Ideology that supports the use and consumption of animal products.


          Things can have several properties, for example a thing can be red, which doesn’t mean the thing is not a cube.