• grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    We need to bring back the Bull Moose Party (at the local level, not the Russian-backed spoiler effect garbage like the Green Party is debasing itself at).

    • psvrh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      A better idea is to do to the Democratic Party what the Tea Party and MAGA did to the Republicans.

      Primary out corporate candidates and push for progressive ones at every level. President, congressional rep, school board trustee, dog-catcher: it doesn’t matter.

      The problem progressive voters have is that they don’t show up, and the especially don’t show up during off years, in primaries and in down-ballot races. The polticial right, by comparison, has been getting people in place on small races for years.

      Sanders did more for progressivism by enthusing Democratic members to vote in primaries and down-ballot races than Stein or any third party has ever done, and we’re seeing results. It needs to continue.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        That’s a nice thought, but it won’t happen because the ratcheting effect of primarying out moderates only works in one direction, rightward. This is because corporate donors are just as happy to fund fascists as they are moderates.

        In contrast, progressive candidates often don’t stand a chance because corporate donors fucking hate them and will spend effectively unlimited amounts of money to destroy their chances, especially if they make regulation and oversight of corporations a big part of their platform. Ditto for the police “union[sic]” and police reform, or AIPAC and opposing genocide, for that matter.

      • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        No thanks. Ranked Choice voting or bust. Yall choosing bust? Sall good with me, I had a vasectomy so I don’t have kids. Rest well kids, you won’t ever have to suffer these fools (me too, thanks).

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      I can see the reasoning that the presidency is the biggest office and gets people talking about third parties the most…

      But the reason the Green Party is obviously a grift is they focus on battleground states for those presidential runs.

      If they were doing what they said they’re trying to do, they’d focus on states like Cali where they can get the media attention and votes while not handing the presidency to Republicans.

      Like everything in American politics, it all depends on what state something is happening in

      • HakFoo@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        But conversely, the “spoiler” factor of even a fuly realized Green campaign is nil if the Democrats tack left. Pull the plug on Bibi and Jill Stein has very little to talk about.

        It’s like they know the party will never bother to win those voters, and assumes they’ll capture them as good-enough/lesser-evil.

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          Yep, if the easiest votes to get were between the two parties, Republicans wouldnt pull the shit they do with far left parties while embracing the far right.

          They’d move to the center to fight for those mythical “moderates” or at least have the Green party positioned slightly to the right of the Dem party.

          But they’re not. Because Dems just use those mythical moderates as an excuse to do what big money donors want. Moving to the right is effective at raising money from billionaires, but completely ineffective at increasing Dem votes.

          The party and the voters don’t have the same goals.

        • Maeve@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          If she did this and raised taxes on corporate and individual wealthy, it would be a win of historical proportions.

    • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      You wouldn’t bring up the shortcomings of First Past The Post voting and then do nothing to change the voting system… would you?

      So glad to hear of your public promise to work towards pass electoral reform in your state. Wishing you and your people the best of luck in this campaign you just signed up for.