• givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    I can see the reasoning that the presidency is the biggest office and gets people talking about third parties the most…

    But the reason the Green Party is obviously a grift is they focus on battleground states for those presidential runs.

    If they were doing what they said they’re trying to do, they’d focus on states like Cali where they can get the media attention and votes while not handing the presidency to Republicans.

    Like everything in American politics, it all depends on what state something is happening in

    • HakFoo@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      But conversely, the “spoiler” factor of even a fuly realized Green campaign is nil if the Democrats tack left. Pull the plug on Bibi and Jill Stein has very little to talk about.

      It’s like they know the party will never bother to win those voters, and assumes they’ll capture them as good-enough/lesser-evil.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yep, if the easiest votes to get were between the two parties, Republicans wouldnt pull the shit they do with far left parties while embracing the far right.

        They’d move to the center to fight for those mythical “moderates” or at least have the Green party positioned slightly to the right of the Dem party.

        But they’re not. Because Dems just use those mythical moderates as an excuse to do what big money donors want. Moving to the right is effective at raising money from billionaires, but completely ineffective at increasing Dem votes.

        The party and the voters don’t have the same goals.

      • Maeve@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        If she did this and raised taxes on corporate and individual wealthy, it would be a win of historical proportions.