- cross-posted to:
- nominativedeterminism@feddit.uk
- cross-posted to:
- nominativedeterminism@feddit.uk
You must log in or register to comment.
ha, I haven’t heard this before. thanks.
To be clear, Marx was anti-ideology, it didn’t mean he was against his own framework of analysis nor that “Marxists” are going against Marx by referring to themselves as such, it’s just a funny anecdote.
sounds like he was against how the French marxists were employing “Marxism” from his letter.
Yes, they failed to understand the Base and Superstructure having the ability to impact each other.
how did the French Marxists not understand that people affect culture and culture affects people?
those elements seem very difficult to even theoretically disassociate.
Not people, the Mode of Production. Capitalism projects cultute that supports it, like Liberalism, but the French “Marxists” didn’t loop that back to Liberalism influencing Capitalism, and then that newly influenced Capitalism projecting new forms of Liberalism. This is why it develops in “spirals,” dialectically.
not recognizing that the means of production affects culture and culture affects the means of production seems almost as improbable as not understanding people affect culture.
do you mean they just didn’t understand it using the terms that marx specifically set out in his treatise?
GOD THE LEMMERS NOT UNDERSTANDING CREATIVE COMMONS LICENSES
DO NOT JUST USE IMAGES FROM THE INTERNET HOWEVER YOU LIKEwhat
muh copyright law
according to law, you need explicit permission to use photos you found on the internet
Philomena Cunk, the thinking man’s Mandy
Nomative determanism
He was a big fan of Groucho
Zeppo: Socialism, get your tutsi fruitsi socialism…
He was just a random 20th century composer of (church) music. Nothing Marxist about that.
