• Nick Lockwood@mastodon.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    @TDCN @Showroom7561 like most fines, this just makes it legal for rich folk and potentially life-destroying for poor folk.

    If this happens to a taxi driver, they might end up homeless. If it happens to a rich playboy they’ll just go buy a new car and carry on speeding.

        • Jesse@aus.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          @nicklockwood @TDCN @Showroom7561 no, it’s just politically impossible to mandate speed limiters. Governments tried 50yrs ago and haven’t tried again since. Car manufacturers want people to know they can speed. It’s all over their marketing.

          • Nick Lockwood@mastodon.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            @jessta @TDCN @Showroom7561 if they really wanted to they could use the traffic camera network that already tracks numbers plates to do average speed checks on every car and issue fines automatically. I suspect they don’t because then traffic would grind to a halt.

            • TDCN
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Why would it grind to a haltm I see no reason for this. People just need to drive the speed limit. In Norway for example they have cameras at the begining of long stretches of highway and a camera at the end and if your average speed is higher than allowed it automatically sends you a fine. Those stretches of road are soooo nice to drive because everyone are driving the same speed and it’s so smooth

    • TDCN
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The taxi driver could also… Just hear me out… Drive the speed limit and not drive like a maniac. Then he’s fine and noone takes his car.

      • Nick Lockwood@mastodon.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        @TDCN sure, unless it was the car owner’s friend, or kid, or crack addict neighbour who took their car and then committed the crime.

        Regardless, the issue is not whether crimes should be punished, but whether it makes sense to have punishments that only affect the poor.

        • TDCN
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Just don’t lend the car out to anyone you don’t fully trust. Take responsibility of your vehicle and make it clear to the borrower that he/she should drive properly regardles of that being your mom or your best friend. If the car is taken without your consent it’s theft and grounds for the exceptions in the law so you get it back.

            • TDCN
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Okay hers the thing. It’s naive to think that it’s just “nothing” for rich people. You have to take the rest of the law into consideration. They obviously don’t just take the car from the owner as the only thing with this kind of extream offence (obviously, otherwise it’ll be a dumb law). On top there’s a huge (and I mean huge) fine for the driver and they take your lisence and you are completely banned from driving for X amount of years. After the ban you have to pay for a completely new drivers license which is really expensive but more importantly really time-consuming in Denmark. We are talking weeks of training and mandatory tests, first aid exam and hours of theory and practical lessons. There are payments to a fond that raises money for traffic victims and for multiple offenses or if you drove exceptionally wreklessly there’s possibly jail time. Even if you are rich this is not just “pocket money” there’s more context than you think.