YouTube Premium users across the globe are facing significant price hikes as Google increases subscription costs in over a dozen countries. This follows earlier price jumps in various regions, including the United States last summer. The latest increases vary by region, with some countries experiencing hikes between 30% to 50%. For instance, in Ireland, Belgium, the Netherlands, and Italy, the Family plan will rise from €18 to €26 starting November, while the individual plan will increase by €2 to €14.

Countries affected by these changes include Ireland, Netherlands, Italy, Belgium, UAE, Switzerland, Malaysia, Saudi Arabia, Indonesia, Colombia, Thailand, Singapore, Norway, Sweden, Czech Republic, and Denmark. Although most Reddit reports are from European users, the price hikes also impact the Middle East, Colombia, Singapore, Thailand, and Indonesia. YouTube had already raised its subscription prices in India by 15–20% in late August.

  • amorpheus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    34 minutes ago

    The nice thing about hiking your prices by 50% is that unless a whole third of your users quit, you haven’t lost anything.

    • EddoWagt@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      19 minutes ago

      you haven’t lost anything

      Apart from all future customers that will now choose another service

      • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        12 minutes ago

        That’s the good thing about a monopoly. You don’t have to worry about customers choosing another service.

  • TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    39 minutes ago

    It’s so odd that a platform that relies so much on user content charges as much as or more than network streaming services. The market hold is leaking into it (and out).

  • Juice@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I can’t wait for google to crash and burn. Bring back GeoCities and Netscape navigator.

    • Qkall@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      48 minutes ago

      There’s a neocities project… As for Netscape… I think SeaMonkey is still active?

  • elliot_crane@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    102
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    It is morally correct to adblock youtube.

    E: I can’t hear any of these counterpoints over the sweet ad-free youtube I’m getting for free.

        • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Yup. But people would rather just carp on about Revanced and Insidious or whatever, as if everyone has the time to and the inclination to set that up.

          Meanwhile, everyone else will piss and moan for a month, then pay up and keep watching.

          • Gamoc@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            59 minutes ago

            What the hell are you talking about? I download an apk, I install it, I’m done. How many ads will you sit through before you’ve wasted the whole minute it would’ve taken to do?

          • Ostrichgrif@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            20
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            11 hours ago

            If you have the time to watch YouTube enough that you’re considering premium you have enough time to set up these systems. The time it saves you makes back the setup time very quickly for someone watching even a moderate amount of YouTube.

            • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              10
              ·
              11 hours ago

              If you have time to relax and watch your favourite creators, you have time to set up arcane systems to avoid seeing ads!

              No. YouTube is relaxing time, not doing work time.

              • xthexder@l.sw0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                6 hours ago

                It takes less than 30 seconds to install uBlock Origin. It’s the first thing I do on a new install after replacing Edge with Firefox

              • pycorax@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                10 hours ago

                I can concede Insidious especially with the recent news but Revanced is so easy and quick to set up, calling it arcane is laughable. It’s done in under 5 minutes.

    • kameecoding@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      23
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      Wouldnt that just cause them to increase prices more? Since now someone else has to pay for the bandwith you use?

      Thus what you are doing is using your technological know how to offload your costs onto less technical users who can’t adblock.

      The morally correct thing to do is to stop watching youtube and/pr go to a paid platform that’s an alternative, like floatplane or nebula and support the creators there, isn’t it? But let’s be honest, we all know you just want adfree youtube videos for free.

      • Praise Idleness@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        34
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        13 hours ago

        You think YouTube is some kind of Mom pop shop down the block? They have more than enough money to burn. Least they can do is to serve adfree videos, better, I might add.

        Thus what you are doing is using your technological know how to offload your costs onto less technical users who can’t adblock.

        Which is the reason why we should help people get adblocks more, which is also recommended by the FBI.

      • elliot_crane@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        14 hours ago

        I’m ok with all of that. It furthers my goal of hitting the platform back in response to their predatory marketing practices and de facto monopoly. Also, I do support creators outside of youtube. In short, I don’t feel bad about any of this.

  • Fugtig Fisk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Must be 50-60 people right? Who pays for premium??

      • Fugtig Fisk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        49 minutes ago

        I know, it is the reason why I don’t watch YouTube. I am just surprised that their tactic of gradually increasing the amount and duration of ads, worked!

    • figaro@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      YouTube is the only streaming platform I pay for. I don’t want to bother with 3rd party apps, and I use it every day. Plus I get YouTube music out of it, so I don’t need to pay for Spotify. Overall 7/10 it’s fine.

      No judgements toward people who don’t want to pay though, I get it.

      • localhost443@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        I bailed because the YTM algorithm is terrible compared to when it was Google music. It had got progressively worse and I really realised how bad it was when I subbed to Deezer for a trial. If they hadn’t trashed Google music by integrating it into YouTube I’d still be paying for premium if it came with both. Can’t imagine I’ll ever pay for it again now.

  • Teils13@lemmy.eco.br
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    14 hours ago

    The Peertube protocol developers should develop a central hub webpage space for newcomers, allow accounts there to follow all channels in every instance (and to only follow and block specific instances too), and then develop apps for smart tvs. It’s the only realistic FOSS alternative to Youtube i can think of, and i dont know why the first point is still non existent (having already subscribed to several channels in 3 instances using separate accounts).

  • spicystraw@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    Been paying for years now, got a 50% price hike. Canceled on the spot. I like the creators I follow, but recommendations have sucked for me for several months now anyway.

    Any advice for streaming ad free on Chromecast or Samsung tv?

  • Mandy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    And this is what happens cause the vast mayority of people don’t give a rats ass as long as they can consume

    Welcome to the monopoly

    • Gregor@gregtech.eu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      Bitwarden is worth it. (Yes, I know, I should self host it. I do, but I still see it as a good deal.) Also Hetzner is a good subscription. So yes, some are worth it

      • Engywuck@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        19 hours ago

        Agreed:

        -Bitwarden

        -Storage Share

        -ControlD

        -Real debrid

          • Firestorm Druid@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Out of curiosity, what do you do with all that storage? Can’t imagine I’d ever need that much personally

            • deranger@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              15 hours ago

              Just do the cheap unlimited personal plan and hook up a shit load of external HDDs to your PC. I have a system where my NAS syncs to my PC which syncs to Backblaze so I can sorta hack my way into unlimited NAS backup for $10/mo.

              3-2-1 backup where the primary source of data is the NAS, on site backup is desktop PC external HDDs, off site backup is Backblaze.

          • kratoz29@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            14 hours ago

            So, only cheap services are worth it?

            Are there some expensive services that are worth it? not just that they increase their price just because.

            Don’t get me wrong, I want more examples (and I am a happy subscriber of Real-Debrid for years already).

            • Engywuck@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              5 hours ago

              Well, I use what I need. I’m not going to pay an expensive service just because. For instance, I wouldn’t pay for Proton. It’d be quite useless (and expensive) for my use case. I do have a paid Zoho email account, tho.

          • Gregor@gregtech.eu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            17 hours ago

            That’s an insanely good deal! I should move pict-rs to backblaze on my Lemmy server

    • Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      i meam the payment for a domain name is kinda worth it. as well as a functional vpn

    • BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      I pay for my email (Proton) password manager (last pass), and VPN (nordvpn).

      I’d say subs that maintain your privacy and security are well worth it - there is no such thing as a free lunch and instead the tech giants are dining out at the expense of users.

      Googles ad monopoly needs to be torn apart. Because YouTube premium prices may actually represent what it really costs to maintain video sites like YouTube, but Google have managed to destroy all competition with the free model and now there is no one realistically able to compete on content or price.

      • forgotaboutlaye@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Sorry if you get this a lot, but have you tried Bitwarden? It’s been a while since I compared but last I checked I found it miles better than LastPass.

    • dmtalon@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      13 hours ago

      So, steal everything or something else? Content isn’t free. The ad model exists, but only works if people see the ads.

      If everyone blocks all ads, and doesn’t pay a subscription, how’s that work for those providing the service?

      I’m not defending YouTube here, just curious what your solution is to have a service and not pay for it.

      I do pay for YT family Premium in the US. I watch mostly YT, and it is my music streaming service. I definitely​ liked it more when it was costing me $15/mo for that and was mad when that went to $23. I even tried switching to Spotify and using ad blocking on YT. I didn’t jive with Spotify, and while ad blockers work for YT, it’s a bit of a pain installing them on TV boxes and managing subscriptions across devices, asking with which videos you’ve seen etc.

      • TechAnon@lemm.ee
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Not op, but I think a solution would be having AI watch the videos and tracking what the people are saying, wearing, using etc and posting links to purchase those things in the description. They get a cut of sales and can also sell links for competing products if companies want more exposure. This could be effective and noninvasive. Give a cut to content creators and it may be even more effective.

      • ugo@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        Youtube revenue in 2023 (before these price hikes) was 31.5 billion USD.

        The revenue for the entirety of alphabet in 2023 was 307 billion USD.

        Youtube alone generated 10% of the entire revenue of alphabet’s portfolio in 2023.

        Yes, revenue is not profit, but I could not find profit figures for youtube.

        Alphabet’s operating income for 2023 was 84.3 billion USD. Assuming a similar proportion of revenue to operating income (I know, hella extrapolating, but again no direct sources for youtube) that would put youtube’s operating income in the ballpark of 8 billion USD.

        It’s not that they aren’t making money because people are “stealing” as you say from poor little indie company youtube. It’s just that they want more more more MORE MORE MONEY.

        Because of course they do. It’s never enough.

        Edit: because I forgot to link my source: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1652044/000165204424000014/googexhibit991q42023.htm

  • Usernameblankface@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Unless the backlash is a huge percentage of users immediately stop using the service, they won’t care. They already calculated how many users they’d lose and how much more profit they get to bring in off of those who decide to stay.