The United States is unlikely to stop supporting Ukraine in its war against Russia, regardless of the presidential election, Admiral Rob Bauer, Chair of the NATO Military Committee, said at a conference in Seoul, according to Bloomberg.
He also noted that Donald Trump made it clear in his debate with Kamala Harris that he wants the war to end. Furthermore, both the Democratic and Republican parties advocate for continued assistance, the admiral said.
“I think it’s unlikely in that light that the US as a country will stop supporting Ukraine,” Bauer said.
Those words aren’t present in the article.
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/implication
Can I suggest expressing what you’re trying to communicate explicitly, using prose.
Removed by mod
I know how you can help them understand implications. Take them out on your boat, to the middle of the ocean.
OK. That seems really dark.
I haven’t seen “it’s always sunny in philadelphia”, but I still got the reference…
It’s not dark, you’re misunderstanding me, bro.
I understand what an implication is.
I do get what you’re trying to say.
Correction, you’re now pretending as if you knew what an implication is the whole time, when you clearly didn’t. If you had done, you wouldn’t have written “those words don’t appear on the text”, as I was obviously writing down what the implication is, not directly quoting something. Ie, in other words, yes, it is unlikely that Trump will win, so in most cases, US won’t stop supporting Ukraine, but on the off-chance that the diapered orange clown wins, he definitely would bend over for Putler.
LOL
That’s a mighty fine argument there, buddy.