• 9point6@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    521
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    3 months ago

    Hard no from me

    I don’t want some nutjob with too much time stalking me because I upvoted something about climate change or downvoted some bigoted shit. We all know those fuckos are out there

    Voting on Reddit-like platforms is soft moderation by a community, and if you disincentive that, the whole model kinda falls apart IMO

    • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      148
      arrow-down
      22
      ·
      3 months ago

      Your votes are already public. It’s a matter of (a) do we want to make it slightly easier for the people who aren’t technically inclined to see them too (b) do we want people acting with the awareness that they’re public.

      (a) doesn’t have a clear answer to me. The answer to (b), though, is clearly yes.

      • Rimu@piefed.socialOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        165
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        3 months ago

        Your votes are already public.

        People say this all the time, but it’s not really the case.

        I don’t think privacy is a binary thing that one either has or does not - there are degrees of privacy. Currently what we have is mostly private, requiring either technical skill or admin access to circumvent. This is a pretty high bar which 99% of people would not be able to reach. You’re proposing removing the bar entirely because it is not high enough.

        • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          33
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          You’re proposing removing the bar entirely because it is not high enough.

          Incorrect. I said that I see no obvious answer as to whether to remove the bar – that’s the (a) part. What I’m proposing to do is definitely to educate people about the existence of the bar and the fact that they shouldn’t be voting on porn, or contentious political topics from an account with their real name, or etc etc like that.

          More than 1% of the currently active Lemmy users are actively running a server (it’s 1.4%, 649 active instances out of 45k MAU), so I think the number is definitely less than 99% of people who wouldn’t know how to do it in the first place (or find an mbin or Friendica server or etc).

          The broader point about it being fairly difficult / fairly rare to have the knowledge, I can agree with, but I wasn’t saying necessarily that we should make it easier for the 98.6% of people to do; just that everyone should be aware that it’s possible so they can make their voting decisions with that knowledge in mind.

        • Adam@doomscroll.n8e.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          You say that, but you simply have to be using something that isn’t Lemmy and that information is there (doubly so if you’re an admin on any of these systems)

          • Rimu@piefed.socialOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            32
            ·
            3 months ago

            Hmmm I see a bunch of my friends have not upvoted my post. I will contact them to ask why not and ensure that they do.

        • mke@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          I agree with the general point that privacy isn’t a binary thing, but I don’t think the bar is nearly so high, as it simply takes opening the post in the right kbin(/mbin?) instance. This requires neither technical skill nor admin privileges.

          • can@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Oof, I’d rather just stick to Lemmy and let people see my votes rather than deal with karma.

            • kux@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              that’s kind of the point, other instances are already aggregating and rating your votes given and received, why shouldn’t lemmy show this to you?

              • can@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                3 months ago

                I liked it being relatively obfuscated. Even though I rarely downvote. But the ones I do are the ones I’d like to avoid. Tbh I’m more ambivalent compared to my thoughts on karma.

          • sramder@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            People who downvote more than upvote tend to be the ones who get in fights a lot and say snarky, inflammatory and negative things.

            Summed up my whole sense of humor in half a throwaway sentence ;-)

            Seriously though, interesting read, thank you kux… you can really feel the author’s frustration and yet I can’t help but feel that they are interested in a certain kind of idealistic online community. Reddit but with a really restrictive HOA where everyone has the exact same color mailbox.

            • kux@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              the author almost certainly has more experience in managing online communities than me (i have none) but it seems counterintuitive to see a dumb take, downvote and bother to leave an argumentative reply rather than just downvote and scroll past. downvotes in this case would defuse potential arguments rather than start them, but i’ll defer to the author and assume that’s not what happens

              • sramder@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 months ago

                That was my take on it too. The vague sense that you’re just going to end up with nothing but circle-jerks if you implement all these suggestions. I could also just be whooshing an attempt a levity, something obvious to a seasoned community moderator.

                Hopefully my shitty attempts at socratic method rate a bit better then trolling, but I often doubt it :-)

        • Dandroid@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          Admin access means nothing if you can set up your own instance in an afternoon, federate with everything, then get all the votes copied to your database. I have done this just to prove it could be done, btw.

        • rglullis@communick.news
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          requiring either technical skill or admin access to circumvent.

          What if some troll sets up a website that indexes/publishes this data? What technical skill would be required then?

          The data is public and ignorance is not bliss. People need to be made aware of this. If this will lead to people being more careful about what they post online or how they interact with a public social media service, then all the better.

          • intensely_human@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            How is the data public? I’m asking in the most technical sense?

            This informs an issue I’ve had lately with a group of three people or bots following along my comment chain (All my comments, for a while, were dropping consistently to -2 score in all contexts).

            It’s my understanding that votes are not public. Am I wrong?

            • Adam@doomscroll.n8e.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              All votes are public, they’re literally broadcast to the Fediverse writ large. You vote on something on your server, your server then tells the server owning the thing you voted on and that server then tells anyone who is interested (subscribers on other servers). That way everyone knows that this comment was voted on, but that information is indelibly tied to you - an entity on the Fediverse.

              Lemmy devs just chose not to a) show that information in a UI (plenty of other software out there does) and b) not inform people that was the case. Which leads to the whole point of the thread, hiding this from users merely gives a false sense of security.

            • Dandroid@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              How do you know who you’re defederating with? When I set up my instance, the list of federated instances was thousands. How do you know which one is scraping the data?

            • rglullis@communick.news
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago
              1. You don’t need to be federated to read people’s activities…
              2. Even if there was some type of “authorized fetch” involved, one could bypass it easily by writing a bot on LW to get the data. Then what?
              • Rimu@piefed.socialOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 months ago

                Ok, yeah, theoretically.

                But we’re talking about putting voting info into the UI for anyone to see. Not highly motivated and skilled bad actors.

                • rglullis@communick.news
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  And the “we should not make it available for the public at large because it will lead to abuse” is also theoretical.

                  Anyway, I’m already on record saying that I don’t like the voting system and that we should get rid of it altogether. Voting on content used to be about collective curation, not a constant popularity contest.

                  I’m also on record saying that we need to stop relying on systems that only give us the illusion of privacy and depend on the software developers for culture shaping.

                  If making the vote public gets people to be exposed to these fundamental issues of the current design, and leads us to search for better solutions, then I’m all for it.

                  • Iceblade@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    3 months ago

                    We’ve already seen that kind of harrasment on major platforms including X and those owned by Meta.

        • index@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Currently what we have is mostly private, requiring either technical skill or admin access to circumvent. This is a pretty high bar which 99% of people would not be able to reach.

          I’m down to work on an analyzer tool that would make it easier for everyone to see the votes

      • zerofk@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        (b) will just lead to fewer up and down votes, i.e. less engagement. That in turn could lead to slowly bleeding out.

      • it_depends_man@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        I would like a (c) where my instances collects all the votes on the post, and then transmits an anonymized aggregate.

        • SorteKaninA
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          That would require a major change to the ActivityPub standard, which is not easy or trivial. This is at worst infeasible to impossible, at best something that is 5+ years away.

          • socsa@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            This is not true, the piefed admin implemented pseudonymous voting agents in around 48 hours

            • SorteKaninA
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              Piefed’s experimental mechanism isn’t truly anonymous. For instance I’m pretty sure you’re the downvote from PieFed on my comment.

              You can still figure out who is behind votes by examining the proxy voting actors and their voting patterns. But it’s probably close enough.

              If you wanted to share only an aggregate with other instances, that would require activitypub changes.

                • SorteKaninA
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 months ago

                  But if you use that term, don’t say what I said isn’t true.

                  Interesting that you said you didn’t downvote me and then the downvote from PieFed I saw just before is gone hehe

      • socsa@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        My votes on piefed are not public. This dev took the obvious idea of a dedicated voting agent and implemented it in about 48 hours.

    • Coelacanth@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      3 months ago

      I agree with you. I remember arguing about this a year ago when people first discovered votes were public on Kbin. I don’t want to obsess over who up- or downvoted me and I don’t want anyone else doing that either. Discussions are healthier when voting is anonymous (or at least obscured as is currently the case).

      If bots become such an overwhelming problem that all regular users need access to voting records to better report all the bots I’ll maybe revisit my stance. But right now the gains seem dubious.

    • GBU_28@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      Mod-admins are already doing this, even if you vote and don’t comment on something.

    • SorteKaninA
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      Isn’t the obvious thing to just have it be an option that admins can enable or disable? Maybe have a third option for only showing upvotes? Then it’s up to each instance to decide, and users can decide to go to instances with the option their prefer.

    • zecg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s already public, it’s just lemmy users who don’t see them.

    • Xyre@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      What might be interesting would be to have it displayed, but grouped by instance. That way we could see some data and potentially uncover troll instances or attempts to brigade the conversation without opening ourselves up to personal attacks.

    • index@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I don’t want some nutjob with too much time stalking me because I upvoted something about climate change or downvoted some bigoted shit.

      They can read your comment history why would you care about them being able to see what you upvoted?

      Voting on Reddit-like platforms is soft moderation by a community, and if you disincentive that,

      How does that disincentive it? It actually makes it better

      • 9point6@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        I specifically don’t comment on people that give off the vibe they might be one of those kind of nutjobs, precisely because it gives them a notification with my username attached if I do. I’m on this site to kill some time with low effort, I want to minimise the risk of attracting the attention of some weirdo.

        I downvote in those scenarios and then report if appropriate. If enough other users feel the same way the comment goes down to the bottom of the thread and fewer users see it. Especially if it’s something that a mod eventually removes, as it reduces the reach until a mod can get to it.

        If I risk retaliation for doing that, I (and others) will just stop, meaning those comments stay up front & centre and we lose that soft moderation plus that engagement in general. Going into the comments will just end up being a worse experience

    • Socialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      28
      ·
      3 months ago

      I don’t want some nutjob with too much time stalking me because I upvoted something about climate change or downvoted some bigoted shit. We all know those fuckos are out there

      I’m dealing with one right now! lol It’s crazy.

      • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        You don’t even have serial downvoters. You have a few comments without many downvotes. You just consistently post the worst possible political pisstakes repeatedly and constantly and nobody likes them when they run across it every time.

        • Socialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          33
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          You just consistently post the worst possible political pisstakes repeatedly

          Strange that you would say that. I haven’t posted any political articles to this community. This is the fediverse community.

          nobody likes them when they run across it every time.

          Really? So an article about a ninety year old woman, who finally graduates college, posted to my own sub, with 3 subscribers, and got 9 votes within a minute of posting is political? That doesn’t seem like a political “pisstake.”

          Or 13 downvotes in my own educational sub about a college that gives out 3-year degrees. It has 2 subscribers in that sub. That doesn’t seem like a political “pisstake.”

          Or 14 downvotes about a program serving underprivileged children and helping them go to college. and the downvotes were within 2 minutes of posting. To a sub that has 2 subscribers. That doesn’t seem like a political “pisstake.”

          And since all my postings to a political sub are about third parties, from legit news orgs, seems kind of a stretch to call them “political pisstakes.”

          But wait, I haven’t posted any of those articles to this community. So strange how you would know so much about what I post.

          Of course, posting history is public. But I haven’t checked your post history, because I don’t care. Strange that you would check mine. And then not mention all of the non-political posts.

          You know, what’s really weird too? I posted some articles to the c/science committee. And even some posters there commented on how strange it was that my posts were being downvoted so much and so fast, when the articles weren’t political at all.

          Luckily the science people are cool, and the upvotes quickly outnumbered the downvotes.

          But yeah, they were definitely curious about why so many downvotes so quickly on neutral science reporting.

          But meh, probably just a coincidence.

          I think maybe you are right. Because for sure there wouldn’t be an incel loser, who is so butthurt about my not voting for his candidate, that he’d follow me around. And downvote articles and take screenshots of how much I post, or set up alternate accounts just to engage with me after I blocked him.

          That’s way too strange. There is no way a loser would be so pathetic to do that. All because he doesn’t like the Green Party.

          So now that I’ve thought about it, I agree with you.

          It would be just too crazy that an incel loser like that would follow me around. I mean, sure he can’t get a girlfriend, but hey, I’m sure he’s not THAT mad at the world. :)