Found this blog post and found it had more insight into the issues around the dev and the toxicity in FOSS

  • skizzles@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 months ago

    Exactly this.

    Just because you wrote your documentation a certain way, doesn’t automatically mean that you feel a certain way about any particular group, or that your users are primarily a certain gender. It may just be writing what pronoun you are most familiar with.

    In this particular case, we can see that the author didn’t exactly make the best case for himself.

    However, there was never a problem to begin with until the person that requested the change also accused the the author of assuming that the user/dev of the OS is male.

    If that little bit of accusation would have been left out, and they just put a note like “grammatical correction” it may have just been accepted and moved on. Instead they asked for a change while accusing the author of feeling a certain way.

    • MrBobDobalina@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      4 months ago

      So, not ‘exactly this’. I wrote that in my example an assumption had been made, whether I intended it or not.

      Same as in the documentation this post is about, therefore the problem existed before it was pointed out.

      The grammatical error to be fixed was the assumption in the language used. Both of these things are true. Pointing it out very simply, as part of providing the reason for the change, is completely normal