A community index of servers added a new rule recently, that requires every participant to defederate from Threads. Some admins are unhappy.

Server indexes of places for newcomers to join can be instrumental for Fediverse adoption. However, sudden rule changes can leave some admins feeling pressure to change policies in order to remain listed.

  • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.worldEnglish
    817·
    9 months ago

    Is this really a problem for Lemmy though? Threads content isn’t going to show up here because threads doesn’t have communities, and Lemmy doesn’t allow you to follow people.

    • Ashtear@lemm.ee
      18·
      9 months ago

      Part of the concern is deceptive/astroturfed content developed as advertising showing up in Lemmy communities. While those same actors could theoretically be based on lemm.ee, that’s a lot more work than simply scaling up operations when you’re doing it on Threads anyway.

      • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.worldEnglish
        64·
        9 months ago

        Yes, my point remains. Even if a Lemmy instance is federated with masto or threads, the content does not appear here on Lemmy right now. It’s physically impossible. Lemmy literally has no code written to support self posts and to follow users.

        For example, here is NPR’s masto account viewed through Lemmy.world. You get their name, avatar, banner, and bio….but zero content.

        https://lemmy.world/u/NPR@mstdn.social

        Until lemmy decides to copy Reddit’s user pages, this isn’t a problem. Federate, defederate - makes now difference for lemmy right now.

      • Melmi@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish
        47·
        9 months ago

        I feel like this would be spotted and stamped out immediately. Everyone’s eyes are on Threads right now; astroturfed content might sneak in on Mastodon, where regular Threads content will be mixed in with the hypothetical astroturfed content, but here on Lemmy there will be little to no Threads presence due to lack of interoperability, so every single Threads account that shows up will be noticed. It’s already super visible when Mastodon users show up due to the weird formatting issues that happen due to the lack of support.

        I just don’t see an astroturf campaign as being viable unless Threads implements community functionality, which seems pretty far out when they’re only now implementing basic federation with Mastodon.

        • Sean Tilley@lemmy.mlOPMEnglish
          71·
          9 months ago

          It’s not that crazy, the Threads devs are already looking at specific FEPs for things like quote posting. If they really wanted to, they could implement Lemmy-compatible community groups.

    • SorteKaninA
      6·
      9 months ago

      Threads can still participate via comments on Lemmy. I believe they can also post to communities via hashtags?

      • Blaze@dormi.zoneEnglish
        21·
        9 months ago

        Mastodon has groups similar to Lemmy communities, Threads could definitely implement them too.

      • intensely_human@lemm.ee
        26·
        9 months ago

        And what kinds of trouble do you expect Threads users to create by participating in our communities?

        • SorteKaninA
          71·
          9 months ago

          Well, for one thing, Threads is already full of ads. And I don’t mean Threads ads, I mean users posting ads, like ads for their own products or services or for their audience, trying to be an influencer and all that.

          But it’s not necessarily the users that will be problematic. It’s more that by federating with Meta, you’re giving value to Zuckerberg. And I don’t want to do that.