• Ech@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    118
    ·
    8 months ago

    I see this a lot in media criticism. People complaining about “plot holes” or something just not making sense, meanwhile it was explicitly pointed out or explained. I’d blame people being on their phones or something, but the truth isn’t that sympathetic.

    • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      48
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      People weren’t on their phones when they saw the Stormtroopers let the rebels get away from the death star so they could track them, heard one rebel say “they let us get away from the death star so they can track us,” and then spent 50 years joking about how awful stormtrooper aim is

      • djsoren19@yiffit.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        8 months ago

        It’s a good thing there’s like 12-15 different scenes with stormtroopers who can’t aim in the original trilogy then.

      • umbrella@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 months ago

        to be fair all action movie baddies do have garbage aim despite being the scary powerful elite squad militia or something. i hate this trope so hard.

      • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 months ago

        And Tarkin telling Vader, “You’re sure the homing beacon is secure aboard their ship? I’m taking an awful risk, Vader. This had better work.”

    • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      People complaining about “plot holes” or something just not making sense

      Then you have Starfield’s main story.

    • Susaga@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      A good example is Titanic where people keep saying Jack could fit on the door, despite the film showing him trying to get onto the door and almost capsizing it, so he leaves it alone to ensure Rose’s safety.

  • fsxylo@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Another one of my favorites: when people read between lines that aren’t there.

    I said what I said, not what you heard.

    Now we’re arguing about what I said even though it was 5 seconds ago.

    • Chestnut@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      8 months ago

      Irl I often repeat what other people say in my own words and ask them if that’s what they believe. It both helps me understand where they’re coming from and confirm I get them

      On the Internet I almost never do.

      Communication is a two way street. You can be as explicit as you want but if people are trying to win an argument instead of have a discussion they’re going to misconstrue what you’re saying more often than not.

      • intensely_human@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        So what you’re saying is you make shit up and then when people deny it, you look at them all smug like “I told you so”?

        • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          See the problem with your comment is that it’s indistinguishable from something the average Lemmy user would actually say in an argument, so it’s very hard to tell if it’s sarcasm

    • oatscoop@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Being able to figure out what another person is trying to say is an important skill some people don’t seem have. I’m not talking about pretending not to understand to “win an argument” either: some folks are legitimately incapable of it.

  • TalesFromTheKitchen@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    I see. But 30 dollars in change are heavy and impractical to carry around. Even if it’s the same value, I’d have to prefer the Bills. My wife is rather petite and has to carry around a lot of change and says it’s tiresome at times.

    • isthingoneventhis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      As someone who has 30$ in bills, even they get in the way and manage to be obnoxious. There was a girl in my middleschool who had "a lot* of change and she was constantly miserable. I wouldn’t wish it on anyone.

      • fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        IDK if this is actually a fashion trend but, I’ve noticed recently some girls with $30 in bills going braless? Like dressed up professionally for office job, sans bra.

        I would 100% do this.

        I would be annoyed if I was unable to because I had too much change.

        • TheHarpyEagle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          8 months ago

          Yeah, a lot of women are rebelling against the idea that you have to wear a bra to look “professional”. Truly people should be able to do what makes them comfortable. I wish I could go bra-less, but my back would give out before the end of the day.

          • fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            I agree they should do whatever makes them comfortable. I also 100% acknowledge that this is a me problem, but I find it very “distracting” in a sexy way. I suspect I just need to get used to it and I’m here for that journey.

            • merc@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              8 months ago

              If you noticed and are distracted (and you’re not the only one), I’d argue that it’s a them problem not a you problem. If you’re “dressed up professionally for an office environment”, that dress code is supposed to be boring, conservative, modest clothing. I personally hate workplaces like that, but if that’s the kind of place you work, then that’s the expectation.

              Assuming what you found distracting were nipples, there are ways of not wearing bras while still keeping nipples hidden or at least discrete. If someone’s supposed to be “dressed up professionally for an office job”, it’s reasonable to say that someone who isn’t making an effort to hide her nipples isn’t meeting the dress code. It would be the same if a guy came in wearing a skin-tight shirt from Father Sons.

              I would love it if we lived in a world where workplaces just let people wear the clothing that made them comfortable, but until we reach that world, people who have to dress conservatively for a business environment are going to have to cover up.

              • RBWells@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                8 months ago

                I grew up before the trend of women being required to have shapeless lumps for breasts and welcome with my whole heart the demise of the foam padded bras and gods damned, horrifyingly named “modesty pads”. There is no way that having nipples should be considered unprofessional but here we are. I don’t like the look of the lumps and don’t like the implication that only the unnatural smooth look is professional.

                • isthingoneventhis@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  I think it’s way more stigmatized in the US than it is in the EU, for example. I’ve seen a lot of nips in professional settings that I find shocking, but only because it’s made me realize how much it is sexualized? in the US. Which is weird.

        • isthingoneventhis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          I feel like we’re going back more to bra-less or “less structured” styles for all sizes, or at least I see it more, which I think is cool. A large portion of people also have pains with bras because there is a lot of shitty/predatory retailers that don’t stock “uncommon” sizes and will try to shove you into “something” so you leave with a purchase so I think it’s kind of a twofold thing. It is shockingly hard to find weird/uncommon sizes outside of online or boutique stores too which can get pricey fast, and finding or having the money to properly find a bra that fits is honestly frustrating because there is huge fluctuation between brands (when there shouldn’t be!!!).

          I personally am not a fan of bearing nips to the world so I’m forever stuck with bras/pasties but maybe one day lol.

    • 𝕊𝕞𝕒𝕔𝕜𝕖𝕞 𝕎𝕚𝕥𝕥𝕒𝕕𝕚𝕔@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      “my wife is rather petite” also supports your view point on the topic.

      BUT another way of viewing the topic is that $30 in paper money only has that value because it has it written on it. If you set them both on fire and melt them, copper and nickel maintain a lot more of their value than paper currency.

      So really it can be argued either way ¯⁠\_(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯

            • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              Bro you saw the answer. They have the same value despite different sizes. It’s simple. Basic. Elementary. 😉

              Joking aside; no I’m totally serious. They should have semi-automated mammogram vending machines that pay people to get tested and they should be as common as the blood pressure kiosks at pharmacies (which should also pay people to use them). The value of catching more treatable diseases earlier in their progression would well outweigh the cost.

        • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          If you ever get lost, $30 in coins will also allow you to leave a longer trail than $30 in bills, thus the change allows for more stretching of the analogy!

    • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I came to a similar conclusion from the greentext. Big and small are valuable but one is more convenient to carry around with you (due to the mass).

      E: I think I see the tumblr users’ confusion here… the sentence

      Suppose you had $30 in coins as well, which would have greater mass?

      can be interpreted like a semicolon or separate sentence…

      Suppose you had $30 in coins as well. Which would have greater mass?

      or as a extension describing the object…

      Suppose you had $30 in coins which would have greater mass as well?

      Some might have taken the latter interpretation which makes the rest of the story incomprehensible.

      • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        8 months ago

        The latter interpretation is itself incomprehensible. So yes, it renders the story incomprehensible, but I don’t know why anyone would consider it.

        • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          You are correct it is, I’m trying to highlight where things diverged in the story into gibberish, which is not easy to tell for someone that lost the thread of the story there. The word “which” is the key difference, so if people miss the first interpretation and go with the other cadence when reading.

          Try this: Read the word “which” in the original sentence in your head or out loud once with a higher pitch than the rest of the sentence. Then try reading the sentence again with the word “which” at the same or lower pitch as the rest. If the reader goes the wrong path then they might not even realize that the alternative is there.

          • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Ok fair enough, but I don’t think it matters specifically how they got to their ridiculous interpretation. The problem is that instead of thinking “hey, I probably misunderstood, I should read that over again” they just started going “REEEEEEEEEEEEEE”

  • Apathy Tree@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    That was a really fun read. I lost some faith in humanity but it was the wavering variety anyway that comes and goes with the social tides. Tide goes in, tide goes out.

  • kokopelli@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’m so dumb. Here I am, thinking I fully understood the metaphor, and yet I read “breasts” as “beasts” and was very confused when people started mentioning boobs.

  • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    8 months ago

    I tested in the 99th percentile for reading comprehension all through school. I also regular miss things when I read and have to go back and realize I’m a dumbass. If my comprehension is better than 99% it’s very concerning.

    • NegativeInf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      8 months ago

      Going back and realizing you’re a dumbass is like 99% of reading comprehension. And iterative learning in general. Assuming you know everything at first blush is absolutely how shit like this happens.

  • Sensationalglyph@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    8 months ago

    The real issue is the person who gets it doesn’t spell out the path of the metaphor from “which has greater mass” through to “which has greater value”. It’s like a text version of a sitcom plot where someone doesn’t say the obvious thing that would stop the entire argument

    • Koordinator O@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      That’s a technic I call learning by figuring out. I realized some time ago that information you figure out yourself lasts longer. When some at work for example asks me something I usually only return suggestive questions. Questions wich if they answer them lead them to the answer of their questions. I always get rolling eyes when I do but it helps in two ways. First is they really manifest the wisdom so they don’t need to ask me a second time and second they learn relativly fast that they have to think what to ask me and how anoying it is so they ask less frequently but more specific. People hate it but it is benefical for both sides in my opinion.

    • MeDuViNoX@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      You want concave chest craters on your ideal mate?

      I’m not saying you’re wrong, I’m just asking.

      • Lowlee Kun@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Sadly i am not very attracted to male faces or penis 😪.

        But lets be honest here, most women do not have animee tiddies. There are probably more flat chested women out there than those with very large ones. I just have to find one 🤞

            • Zozano@lemy.lol
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 months ago

              Did I miss something on Steam? Were people publishing pedo games or something?

              • Kedly@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                No, I had anime on the brain. I thought people were defending 1000 year old dragons that look like children. Which wasnt at ALL what was being talked about, so I deleted my comment.

                Edit: Also I think whichever instance you are a part of doesnt recognize my comment deletion since you arent OP and yet can respond to my deleted message? Either way, interpretation brain fart made my response irrelevant/off topic, so I deleted my comment

                • rockerface 🇺🇦@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Oh, I didn’t see your comment before it was deleted. Yeah, I was taking about a VN that was removed from Steam storefront recently for depicting a character that was shorter and flatter than others, despite clearly stating she’s an adult with a full-time job. IIRC, the game’s name was “Order Us” or something along those lines. I’m not a huge genre enjoyer myself, but it’s concerning how skewed the standards are in depiction of different body types.

  • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    i like how my interpretation is completely different to everyone else.

    naturally, if you were to be carrying a unit of monetary value, you would probably want the one that requires less space, and weight, though the primary factor here is weight. (mass if you want to fucking tumblr me)

    30 dollars in bills is more valuable than 30 dollars in coins because it’s more portable.

    • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      They’re fungible, and can be transferred into each other easily. They have the same value but different situational utility.

      Value is not and cannot be derived solely based on utility in a vacuum. This is proven by the marginal utility of too many titties. While one pair of titties may have value based on their utility, each subsequent pair of titties decreases in utility, as you only have so many hands and so much time.

    • DashboTreeFrog@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      The actual value of the money doesn’t change though, and I think that was the person’s misinterpretation as well, your implicit preference can be different based on how the money is presented but it’s still 30 dollars, bills, coins, stock, gold, whatever. Portability can change, ease of use can change, mass can change, shape can change, but 30 bucks is 30 bucks and titties be titties.

      • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        this as well. But to me, it’s not that it’s the same, it’s that one is different from the other, in an unrelated manner.

        One could argue coins have the distinct advantage in this case of being highly divisible, which is very true.

        The question here was not whether titties were tittes, because that’s obvious. But whether one titty was better than the other titty. I think the point here is demonstrating that it’s not about the monetary value. It’s about how you perceive it.

        • DashboTreeFrog@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Yes, agree, perception is important. I suppose the root of the disparity in our thinking is what “better” even means, because I’d argue that in and of itself is perceptual with no real definitive answer, at least when it comes to forms of money or titties, you can come up with all kinds of reasons for liking or disliking different forms.

          But now I’m really just fascinated by the amount of mental energy we’re all putting into a boob metaphor. Feels like analyzing a koan.

          • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            it’s not just a boob metaphor, it’s a titty metaphor in fact, it’s philosophy under the guise of titties.

            The equivalent to feeding dogs medication covered in peanut butter.

    • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      yes. one has drawbacks for one set of preferences, the other has drawbacks in different ways, for example, if you ran a shop that needed to give change, or you were going to the casino to play slots, or arcade machines, or you were covering a floor in coins decoratively, or you needed to club someone about the head with a heavy sack…