• some_designer_dude@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    10 months ago

    Had not realized they just flew the whole damned drone into things, kamikaze style. Thought they dropped bombs and could re-use ‘em. Or was this a last-ditch kind of thing?

    • Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      10 months ago

      Almost all drones are single use. Only the really top tier stuff like US predator drones are meant to be reused. The others are essentially smart bombs.

    • cynar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 months ago
      • Drones are cheap. Sacrificing one isn’t a huge issue.

      • A 1 way flight can be twice as long.

      • A return flight can be tracked, and personnel are valuable.

      These 3 are the main reasons. If they are striking a target in a low stakes situation, e.g. an abandoned tank, then a bomb and return is completely viable. Similar for a quick surveillance flight.

      In this situation, it’s likely to be spotted, and the spotters motivated to track it. It would have been a shoot and scoot launch, with nowhere to return to, rather than risk visitors, or artillery fire.

    • becausechemistry@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      Maybe it’s a range thing, or being worried they’d be followed back to base? Or having to deal with the second guidance system for the bomb / missile the drone would drop is too much of a hassle for the current situation?

      • leds
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        10 months ago

        range thing

        Can go twice as far if you don’t need to get home

    • Amaltheamannen@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      These are also much much cheaper than cruise missiles. Basically a moped engine and hobby RC aircraft parts with GPS