• conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    I agree with your core concept.

    But this is a pretty wild flaw. The fact that even an admin can’t reliably delete photos from their own instance? That’s begging to be exploited by bad actors. What happens when it’s porn (whether kids or unconsenting adults)? It’s core functionality that you have to have.

    • SorteKaninA
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Admins can definitely delete photos from their own instance. The problem is deleting it from all instances; that is hard.

      • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        This post provides a fairly detailed claim of the opposite. Federation isn’t part of the issue he’s referring to at all. It’s that deleting the image post doesn’t delete the direct link to the file, and that doing so as an admin is really convoluted. He goes through the issue and his effort with an admin trying to help in a decent bit of detail.

        I can’t actually test myself because I don’t have a server, but as far as I’m concerned the issue he’s claiming is a complete showstopper.

        • SorteKaninA
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          doing so as an admin is really convoluted

          It’s not super straight forward, that’s true. But it’s not that hard I would say. But I’m a professional software engineer, I dunno if all admins find it as easy.

        • SorteKaninA
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          This is just a feature request to do it via the web interface, you can still do it manually on the server without too much effort.