• Whirlybird@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I find it hard to believe that the workers didn’t see this coming…

    They’re contractors. They’re not permanent employees. They can, generally, be let go at any time for any reason whatsoever - or no reason at all. It’s crap, but they’re some of the risks of being a contractor. The benefits of higher pay, choose your own hours, choose your own workplace, etc have to be weighed against said risks.

    • justsomeguy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s a bit misleading. They’re not private contractors but employees of a different company instead. The union busting in the US is pretty extreme. I just hope these people can put their talents to work in a company that doesn’t have so many issues complying with the rule “don’t be evil”.

      • Obi@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah Google is well known for employing “contractors” which is just really a way for them to avoid any of the annoying regulations you have with actual employees, by having them be employed by a third party but really they’re just working for Google full time. Also looks better on the balance sheets.

        • axtualdave@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          There have actually been a few cases that have made it through the courts that apply “employee” status based on how the company treats the worker rather than how they’re paid.

          Especially in cases where the worker is on long-term assignment somewhere like Google.