We estimate that by 2025, Signal will require approximately $50 million dollars a year to operate—and this is very lean compared to other popular messaging apps that don’t respect your privacy.

  • meteokr@community.adiquaints.moe
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    11 months ago

    Would be interesting to see how this compares to XMPP or Matrix. Obviously the development costs something for each of those, but the hosting costs are spread out across each of those hosting an instance.

    • u_tamtam@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      Yup, that’s a big reason why centralized protocols aren’t sustainable. XMPP is 25 years old (which is older than almost anything else on the contemporary internet) and thriving. Unfortunately, judging by the cycle of messengers coming and dying, and people still being eagerly part of that, this isn’t something that people value very much.

      • helenslunch@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        this isn’t something that people value very much.

        More likely something people don’t even know about since no one is out there spending billions of dollars singing the song of XMPP.

    • Starfarer@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Forgive the ignorance but does xmpp have the same features as signal, particularly around e2e encryption?

      • erwan@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        It’s possible to implement XMPP with E2E encryption, there are at least 2 ways to do it.

        But of course it only works if both users use a client and server that support it.