• Buffaloaf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    127
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wasn’t the 100 tampons thing because they didn’t know how weightlessness would affect bleeding?

    • makeshiftreaper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      221
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That and NASA is a very safety conscious organization. So they want to overestimate everything and include way more than they need. So when she said a couple per day you can round that to 5 for safety, then considering it’s a 6 day mission they want to include triple the amount of needed supplies which means 18 days worth. 18*5=90 which is pretty close to 100 so let’s round up again. Plus tampons are a useful first aid tool, especially in zero gravity. You shove some into an open wound and it’ll prevent blood from spilling all over the very sensitive equipment. Does a woman need 100 tampons for 6 days? Of course not, but she wasn’t going to spend a week in the mountains, she was going to space, so the safety precautions were much more stringent

      • _danny@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        44
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s also a weight thing. Tampons are pretty light, it’s like one hundred per pound, so they probably said “we can budget x pounds for this” and didn’t think much about the reasoning behind why they’re sending several hundred tampons into space, but we’re entirely focused on how.

        • cynar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          There’s also the point that they don’t go bad. It might be easier to send a load up now, that try and fit enough for each female astronaut into every flight.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        34
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Just a word of advice, the tampon in a wound thing, as much as the Russian military might advise it, is not good medical technique. Do not use a tampon to plug a wound. It’ll likely do more harm than good. Just apply pressure to it from the outside with your hand if you have literally no other option.

        • GBU_28@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          1 year ago

          Agree in general. The problem would be debris trapping, fluid compartmenting, sterility, etc.

          But if you need a dressing and that’s all you have, unpacking them into gauze pad like things would be great.

          All of this assuming you are literally flying 7.5km/s towards a trauma center

        • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Can the same be said about doing that in zero gravity with specialised sensitive equipment all around you that are essentially keeping you alive?

          I’ll take an infection over crashing down in the ISS any day.

          • Cethin@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            1 year ago

            Luckily I’m sure there’s plenty of perfectly good alternatives for them. I don’t think we need to even discuss that as am option. Some people will literally buy them for their IFAK in case of gunshot wounds on earth though, so I thought I’d clear it up.

            • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              Huh. Learned something today! Because I remember some “worst case scenario” show where a guy suggested just that if nothing else was available.

              Imagine how much it would suck treating a wound with a tampon and dying of toxic shock. 😬

      • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I learned recently that in space you might not need to piss as the piss floats in your bladder.

        normally you get 3/4s full and really need a slash, but in space it can fill up totally without you feeling anything and then just bust out your urethra without notice.

        honestly, it was probably a fair point.

        • Tlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Your bladder changes volume to hold urine; there’s no floating, just pressure. Gravity affects that pressure though.

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        NASA also does everything they can to save weight though.

        On later Apollo missions, they cut the number of band-aids in the lunar lander’s first aid kit from 6 to 12 to save weight.

        • XTornado@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          they cut the number of band-aids in the lunar lander’s first aid kit from 6 to 12 to save weight.

          I see here is the problem. The guy doesn’t know how to reduce weight, you don’t add more stuff to cut on weight. That explains the extra tampons.

      • Jabbermuggel@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not that I disagree that NASA isn’t safety conscious, but I’ve recently watched a video about the challenge disaster which seemingly could easily have been avoided if they had listened to the weather concerns or redesigned their solid boosters after issues were observed in the first place. I guess in that case they just got too complacent.

    • chaogomu@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      66
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      NASA is obsessed with redundancy, especially when the weight allowance lets them run away with it.

      Add that to the fact that most of the engineers were men, and had literally no clue about how many tampons are needed for a normal woman on earth, and you end up with 100 being sent up for a two-week mission.

        • chaogomu@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          69
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Apparently someone did, and then the response was that tampons are low enough weight that the packaging to send them was the majority of the weight, even when sending 100, so they sent 100.

          They also developed a zero-g makeup kit because they thought that female astronauts would want that. It had eyeliner, lip gloss, foundation, and blush. All specially selected to not generate dust.

          The makeup kit never actually flew, likely because someone asked an actual woman if she would ever want that shit in space.

          • kofe@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            21
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Has no one ever thought to ask if the men might like it? :(

            • otp@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              13
              ·
              1 year ago

              That sounds pretty cool regardless. Space pens are cool, even if mine will never write in zero gravity.

            • Gabu@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              Considering the kind of person that gets to go to space, I doubt anyone wants it. 10 minutes of prettying up are 10 minutes taken away from research.

              • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Might be worth it if you’re aiming to be part of the first couple to bang in space. I’d certainly want to look my best for that.

          • GBU_28@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            1 year ago

            I could see a woman, even an astronaut, carrying about what they looked like on the news when they land. I could also see them not caring. Mileage varies

          • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            1 year ago

            NASA actually did a few press events where they did a live broadcast from either a module or the ISS.

            Even if they don’t wear it day to day, I can see an astronaut perhaps using some makeup for that.

          • umbraroze@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            Zero-G makeup kit sounds like a feasible thing to research, actually. But to utilise it, we haven’t researched epic space station party technology yet. So, you know, priorities aren’t great.

        • hope@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          54
          ·
          1 year ago

          They did ask. The source for the claim is Sally Ride talking about the time NASA asked if 100 sounds like the right number.

        • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          They did. That’s why they didn’t send that many. It’s not like it took them a long time to figure what the worst case number would be that fit in the budget.

  • WHYAREWEALLCAPS@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    Do people really use the term “hosting” when saying you’re having someone over for the weekend? Because I’m getting sex worker vibes otherwise.

  • Gabu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 year ago

    I feel like we’re missing an important piece of the puzzle: are they an alcoholic?

    • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Anyone who drinks more than a few times a week in the US is likely an alcoholic. Put someone in the hospital and have them discuss their usage with nurses over a variety of days… you will get quotes like (1-2 per week and 1-2 per day out of the same person) then you will have a nurse ask what their weekend drinking looks like and they will say “around a six pack”

      Just my observations, maybe I work in a depressed part of the state.

    • adj16@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      55
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      idk, doesn’t seem that crazy to me. if you don’t drink or are a small person with a small tolerance, you might have no idea how many beers a person who drinks more might get through per night. don’t want to underdo it and have them run out, don’t want to overdo it and make them feel like you think they’re a crazy alcoholic. and then obviously add a little d r a m a to it cause it’s a tweet :)

      • Anamana@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I mean if I wouldn’t drink, I just wouldn’t buy no alcohol at all. And if I would, I’d just buy twice the amount I drink if I don’t know any better about the person.

        • Vincent@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          28
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t drink coffee, but I still have it in case my guests want some. It’s just nice.

            • some_guy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              18
              ·
              1 year ago

              You sound like you host fun parties.

              “What? NO THERES NO FOOD, I ATE AN EARLY DINNER AFTER WORK YOU JACKASS.”

              • Anamana@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                9
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                I mean most people eat dinner before they go out? :D And I can communicate with the people I invite, instead of just assuming what they might want over the internet lol.

            • kase@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              17
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Cigarettes are a little easier for someone to just carry in their pocket or purse with them

            • Vincent@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              1 year ago

              No I don’t, though maybe if all my guests smoked I might? It’s somewhat arbitrary anyway, you do some things to make their stay pleasant, and you don’t do others if they’re too much work for too little (of your guests’) payoff.

    • usrtrv@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t drink, I’m always confused when hosting about the amount and type of beer I should buy. And then I’m stuck with beer afterwards the inevitably goes bad. Now I just let people BYOB because they typically did that regardless.

      • MNByChoice@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I don’t drink
        Now I just let people BYOB

        Going to BYOB is the right call. Good on you for focusing on your strengths.

      • Knusper@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t drink either and used to be in a club where I had to work a bar once a year. And every year without fail, I had to re-learn even just the basic categories of beer.

        (Where I live, there’s like 7 different words to describe 4 different popular categories.)

    • figaro@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 year ago

      I grew up Mormon, and am only now figuring this all out. I have no idea about any of this

      • zeppo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s fairly well answered by basic information about alcohol serving sizes, DUI limits, and just the amount of fluids someone can take in over an evening. 1 can of beer = 1 basic dose of alcohol. 2 in an hour puts you over the legal limit for blood alcohol for driving. Someone could typically drink maybe a gallon of fluids in an evening regardless of what it is. Beer is sold in packs of 4-12, which are usually shared. So a normal amount of beer to get for someone who isn’t a regular alcoholic would be 2-6 for a night. It also varies with their weight and the strength of the beer (most is about 5% now but some is higher).

        • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          We really seem to don’t. Saw a screenshot of a tweet the other day about someone’s dad wanting to take a vacation to the spot where JFK was killed and look around, “just in case the FBI missed something,” and people were calling that dude all kinds of awful things instead of just. Laughing. At the joke he was obviously telling

            • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              1 year ago

              And then you try to tell them it’s a joke and they say “jokes are supposed to be funny”

              But like? It is?? How is it not funny???

              • slackassassin@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                1 year ago

                I guess you’d have to accept that it was an absurd postulate. And they did not.

                My favorite was all of the “Doesn’t he know this happened 60 years ago!” Like, mf don’t YOU know this happened 60 years ago!

              • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                1 year ago
                1. This is the internet, there are people who are actually like that, and we’re sick of them.
                2. absent tone of voice, intonation, and an understanding of his character, we have no idea if he’s joking. It’s a story being told second hand through a small amount of plaintext.
          • zeppo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s fairly common for people to miss dry humor, especially online. I can be very deadpan in person and sometimes people who don’t know me well think I’m serious about the most absurd things.