• sun_is_ra@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    148
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    war is between two regular armies. pounding the shit out of gaza after cutting supplies and water can hardly be called war

    • SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s clearly propaganda for internal consumption, because there’s no way in hell that anyone who isn’t spouting hate and foam 24-7 is going to buy the parallelism. They want to fill Zionist radicals with fervor so that they help force dissidents to shut up about the fact that they’re committing genocide.

    • ours@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      1 year ago

      Shooting them is bad press. Bringing down whole buildings with aerial bombardment is much more palatable.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Genocide is the correct term. Massacre is correct, but not precise enough.

  • Mrkawfee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    102
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    If we accept Israel’s argument that it can kill whoever it wants because the other side started it then we are creating a new basis for conflict where wars can always be justified by the instigator.

    • jet@hackertalks.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Countries don’t need arguments for war, but the arguments can slow down international response.

      the ‘forever war’ isn’t new, just has a new coat of paint.

  • Kben@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    I still cant believe the western goverments are sitting idely by while this slaughter happens.

    • Daiken@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      The sad truth is all their media has become pro Israeli. They never even see or hear about the Palestinians plight. They just keep replaying the same crap from Oct 7.

      • nogooduser@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        In the UK we’re seeing a lot about the Palestinian plight on the BBC. We also see news about concern for the hostages but don’t see much about the Oct 7 attack itself anymore.

        • merthyr1831@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          The plight of civilians only entered the media sphere after weeks of false news about the october 7th attack that was used as justification for the UK’s complicity in the massacres that followed. It’s the media trying to save face as the public learn the truth from other means.

          • nogooduser@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I don’t recall seeing any false news on the BBC. They tend to be very good at verifying what they are told and generally say that there were reports of things happening if they haven’t verified it.

            Either way, we are only three weeks from the Oct 7 attack and the BBC has definitely been showing the plight of civilians for a significant proportion of that time so it certainly wasn’t “weeks of false news”.

            • merthyr1831@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              They reported that Hamas had tunnels under Al-shifa hospital hours before it was bombed by Israel, and then refused to cover the fact that the response by Israel was blatant disinformation.

              They reported that pro-palestine demos were “supporting terrorism”, and were actually told to BROADCAST an apology. Despite this, their apology was more “we’re sorry you got mad” and refused to outright say they lied.

              They reported on the “40 beheaded babies” (As did all the UK media) yet this was demonstrably false and was simply quietly ignored from future reports.

              EVERY single palestinian support they interviewed in the opening days of the bombardment were asked if they “condemned hamas”, implying that anyone who DOES support palestine is a supporter of terrorism.

              I think this all counts as weeks of false news, both implicitly from their refusal to properly cover the genocidal rhetoric and behavior of Israel, to the explicit lies and mistruths from the newsdesk.

              If you don’t recall seeing anything false then congrats, you’re the target audience for the propaganda.

      • barsoap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Have you ever watched, random example, DW. BBC isn’t entirely terrible, either.

  • febra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well in their first war of “independence” they kicked out 700k civilians out of their homes and never allowed them to return to their rightful belongings. Is this what they’re again yet again? More land grabs?

  • cunning_bolt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the first time that I’ve realized in real time that a “war” is actually genocide

    The only thing Isreal is accomplishing is guaranteeing there will be another generation of radicalization.

    The asymmetry of this “war” is clear, even in a nation that gives Israel full support by the government and media.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Gaza was plunged into darkness, isolation and violence on Saturday night, its communications with the outside world almost entirely cut, as Israel’s prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, announced his country was entering “the second stage” of what was likely to be a long and difficult war against Hamas.

    (tldr: 6 sentences skipped)

    As 2.3 million Palestinians in the blockaded coastal strip braced themselves for a second night of sharply escalating Israeli military operations, Israel’s defence minister, Yoav Gallant, said that the campaign against the Islamist militant group Hamas would continue until a new order was given.

    (tldr: 7 sentences skipped)

    With links to mobile networks, the internet and electricity inside Gaza almost entirely severed, emergency services, including paramedic teams, were operating almost blind as they struggled to respond to scores of deaths and injuries from the airstrikes.

    (tldr: 4 sentences skipped)

    Israel launched its assault on Gaza after hundreds of fighters from Hamas crossed the Israeli border in vehicles, by air and sea on 7 October, indiscriminately killing civilians in the streets, their homes and at an outdoor rave.

    (tldr: 6 sentences skipped)

    It said: “During a night of intense bombardment and ground incursions in Gaza, with reports of hostilities still continuing, health workers, patients and civilians have been subject to a total communication and electrical blackout.

    (tldr: 2 sentences skipped)

    “Hospitals across Gaza are already operating at maximum capacity due to the injuries sustained in weeks of unrelenting bombardment, and are unable to absorb a dramatic rise in the number of patients, while sheltering thousands of civilians.

    (tldr: 16 sentences skipped)


    The original article contains 1,213 words, the summary contains 261 words. Saved 78%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • artisanrox@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’m sure Bibi’s best buddy Donald Trump will be the first to show up in tacticals and do all the FREEDOMING on the front lines. 🙄

    There must be a massive oil/gas field under Gaza or something for them to do this.

    • artisanrox@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Downvote all you want. You have tea and crumpets with the guy who falls all over Kim Jong Un, and go and name districts after him, then absolutely fffk you and horse you rode in on.

  • Meowoem@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    53
    ·
    1 year ago

    If Cuba started firing missiles at the US the whole place would be ash in hours, I don’t understand what people expect Israel to do when literally every other country on the planet would defend themselves.

      • lom@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        1 year ago

        Against an enemy who killed 1200 civilians after they signed a ceasefire? Who puts their HQ under a hospital?

        The only way human rights can be respected in the future are when Hamas’ ugly face has been wiped off the earth

        • merthyr1831@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Israel kills thousands of palestinians every year, even during “ceasefires” but I guess they don’t count, right?

          The IDF also has its HQ near a hospital. Guess that’s also different, right? Though even that’s generous because despite the claims over the years I’ve yet to see definitive proof of militant Palestinians operating from within a hospital whatsoever, just Israeli claims.

          Or how about the bombing and massacres in the West Bank, where Hamas does NOT control the government? Or how about the fact most of the kids in Gaza are too young to remember the 2006 elections where Hamas was boosted by Israel to power? Or how Israel cut off Gaza’s borders on all sides, forcing civilians to build tunnels to run trade routes?

          None of this matters to you because you dont care about palestinians, you care about Israel having its god-given ethnostate.

          • Meowoem@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            1 year ago

            The accusation that anyone who understands the difficult situation Israel faces is a Jewish fundamentalist is absurd, we might as well say anyone that supports Palestine is a Muslim fundamentalist that wants Sharia law worldwide.

            I’m not defending everything Israel has done but also I’m not dumb enough to think if the tables were reversed that Palestine would be smiling as Israel chucks rockets at it and saying ‘we don’t want to kill Israeli citizens so we’re not going to fire back’ we all know they’d have done what they often talk about and pushes the Jews into the sea.

            I don’t like the government of Israel but at least they care about their own citizens, Hamas are controlled by religious crazies like Iran who are more than happy to increase the suffering of their citizens just to create good propaganda - hence digging up water pipes to make rockets, stockpiling fuel underground while hospitals run dry, putting military facilities under schools and hospitals, blocking roads so civilians can’t flee combat zones, and endless more examples.

            • merthyr1831@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              The fence sitters who think nothing happened before October 7th such as yourself love to use the terms “difficult” and “complex” and imply that Palestinians would love to return the inhumanity they faced to Jews, yet the reality is totally at odds with your fascist-apologia and false reality.

              Even the supposedly extremist and reckless Hamas acknowledges the “right” of Israel to exist, and in its own charter refutes the ideology of antisemitism in place of resisting the colonial regime of Israel. If anything, it’s rather naiive for Hamas to support the 1967 borders in full knowledge that Israel’s very existence is at odds with the rights of Palestinians to live in ““Jewish”” land.

              Palestine, both in Gaza and the West bank, are multi-racial, multi-faith societies that historically and now are orders of magnitude more tolerant to Christians, Jews, and otherwise non-religious foreigners than Israel, which restricts the rights of Christians, Ashkenazi Jews, Ethiopian Jews, and of course Muslims. How tolerant must your society be to allow Israelis to weld the doors to your home shut because you’re not allowed to walk on “Jewish only” streets in Hebron. How tolerant must you be to allow Israeli settlers to steal your home, yet still be made to condemn the people who fight to stop this blatant colonialism in fear of death?

              Israel, even towards its zionist citizens, does not “care” more than it sees them as tools for the destruction of Palestinians, muslims, and arabs, and thus support from Europe and USA in return. Netanyahu and the Israeli state supported the unprovoked violence against palestinians by settlers for months, despite explicit warnings from Egypt, UK, US, and even internal intelligence agencies about Hamas provocations. They suddenly stopped manning their own border wall, allowing Hamas to break through and refused to answer their citizen’s calls for help for SIX HOURS. When they DID turn up, they shot at Israelis and eachother. Israel even makes this policy with their Hannibal Doctrine, which encourages the State murder of hostages or potential hostages to prevent politically embarrassing prisoner exchanges. They’ve already killed at least 50 hostages and denied the return of 2 more because they’d prefer to ethnically cleans Gaza than stop the bombing.

              I won’t even bother answering to the rest of your claims because they’re all increasingly bullshit and partisan despite your claim to neutrality.

              Everything in your post is not only verifiably wrong, but ignorant to the real villain of the unfolding atrocities. Your own fence sitting exposes your real ideology of support for the genocidal and fascist regime cementing power in Israel. You will either have to bear the burden of supporting this holocaust or you will have to make excuses for it when the horrors you and other fence-sitting cowards have aided and abetted come to light - I have no respect for you. Get fucked.

        • filister@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes, definitely, Israelian lives matter more, of course. What are Arabs even doing, we should kill all of them, right, right? /S

        • filister@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I would argue that this is highly questionable. In times of war the truth is the first casualty.

    • Womble@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      most other countries dont keep an open air prison of millions of people on their doorstep and take potshots at journalists and children on the regular.

      • Meowoem@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        America blockaded Cuba without them killing any American civilians, yes Israel is in a fairly unique position but you’re kidding yourself if you think any other nation would react differently.

    • WarlordSdocy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean maybe not take actions that caused groups like this to gain power in the first place. Constantly bombing and attacking a place is a great way to empower groups like this in an area.

      • Meowoem@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        You mean Palestine shouldn’t fire bombs at Israel because that’s what gave right-wing hardliners like netanyahu mandate?

        Acting like this is one sided just isn’t reasonable, its a painfully complex situation.

      • Scrof@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        32
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ah yes the famous unprovoked bombings. Stop reading aljazeera or some shit.

        • ???@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Stop reading Reuters, BBC, the UN, Amnesty, Jewish voices for peace, too? Lol.

          Aljazeera has problems but there are so many other news agencies calling Israel for what it really is?

          • ours@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m not siding with the other guy but Aljazeera is owned by Qatar and has that undeniable bias.

            While I’m aware the BBC has its own bias, I’ve found them somewhat objective (i.e. not labeling Hamas terrorists because that’s a judgment and such) and showing the horrors made by both sides.

    • ours@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Your analogy doesn’t fit and ignores the particularities of the Palestine/Israel situation.

      • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        The part where significant trade is blocked, the land dispute part, the viewed as hostile nation part, the part about attempting regime change, and the part about trying to prevent refugees from coming in all seem pretty similar. The only thing missing is an actual war…

        • ours@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          I disagree. The US would have had to successfully invade Cuba (with the benediction of the international powers), displace its population to a couple of corners of Cuba while replacing them with Americans, and then continuously oppressing them. Oh and occasionally taking more bits of Cuban land for Americans.

          And that’s not even including the religious powderkeg the region represents for not one, not two but three major religions. It would take some extra mental gymnastics to claim the ownership of Cuba to “the chosen people” in the Old Testament.

        • Womble@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s vastly different, even at the height of the Cuban missile crisis the US wasn’t blockading Cuba to prevent food and medicine getting in.