The Picard Maneuver@piefed.world to Funny: Home of the Haha@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 days agoWhat if I'm scared too?media.piefed.worldimagemessage-square62linkfedilinkarrow-up1392arrow-down111
arrow-up1381arrow-down1imageWhat if I'm scared too?media.piefed.worldThe Picard Maneuver@piefed.world to Funny: Home of the Haha@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 days agomessage-square62linkfedilink
minus-squareagamemnonymous@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·6 days agoBiologically, men are disposable. Just by the mechanics of reproduction, a large loss of women is much more devastating to population stability than a large loss of men. I can spell it out, but it should be obvious.
minus-squareGladaed@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up3·6 days agoNo they are not. Raising a child is more work than inseminating a woman. A child requires years of resources to grow and thrive. Your world view is not just bleak, but also wrong. Humans aren’t born as fully fledged beings. The gender ratio is not an accident of nature.
minus-squareagamemnonymous@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·6 days ago Raising a child is more work than inseminating a woman. So? What does that have to do with anything?
Biologically, men are disposable. Just by the mechanics of reproduction, a large loss of women is much more devastating to population stability than a large loss of men. I can spell it out, but it should be obvious.
No they are not. Raising a child is more work than inseminating a woman. A child requires years of resources to grow and thrive.
Your world view is not just bleak, but also wrong. Humans aren’t born as fully fledged beings. The gender ratio is not an accident of nature.
So? What does that have to do with anything?