If that’s not enough, on their home page, their subcommittee logos are SVGs
e.g. https://jpeg.org/images/jpeg-logo.svg
I know there’s no reason why not but I just thought it was funny
You must log in or # to comment.
Next you’re gonna tell me the Word logo isn’t a .docx file???
Or that the GIF logo is a JIFF file
JIFF
You don’t now what you’ve done writing that.
You have me here debating to myself:
a) It is a just a play on how GIF sounds
b) it is a typo and it meant TIFF
c) it is a typo and it meant JFIF
d) it is a an alternative way to saying JFIF
e) something else
I could throw a curve ball in there and say: “In my language J is silent” 😂 but that’d be lying. Luckily in Danish we say GIF with a hard G… Why does that sound kinda bigoted tho…
I believe in some languages, J is pronounced like how English pronounces Y.
Ja. 🙃
Whoops that’s what i was thinking and wondered why it’s not in OPs list
Nice hard G you have there… ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
There is a JIF file format too, see JPEG Annex B or Wikipedia.
the MP3 jingle is a .flac
It really whips the llama’s ass
it’s almost like they know jpeg is the wrong format for a logo
It really is. Still amused me though.
JPEG XL on the other hand,
It just goes to show the JPEG team knows what their image format is designed for, and what its not designed for.
I heard that the meat industry’s website is not made from actual meat. Madness!
I’m surprised to learn the meat industry, as a concept, has a website! Shocking!
Of course it is. JPEG is not designed for logos. Why would they use their format for a purpose it’s not designed for, thus making it look bad for no reason?
Could’ve been worse, could’ve been a webp picture. Could’ve been better too: JPEG-XL
They feed us poison (webp) so we buy their “cures” (avif) while they suppress our medicine (jpeg-xl)
Never forgive Google for what they took from us
…Is the logo meant to be representative of JPEG compression artifacts?
JPEG logo
*looks inside*
PNG😒
The logo is 3.2 kb as a PNG, 3.2 kb as a webp, 2.7 kb as an avif, and .8 kb as a JXL
All are lossless, JXL lossless is crazy good
its 6.8 kb with jpegli (modern jpeg encoder) at what I would consider “good enough” quality (the original jpeg encoder is a fair amount worse and mozjpeg is actually a lot worse for some reason on this image)
using the image toolbox app for the testing btw, its foss and on fdroid
this makws me angry
It really shouldn’t. JPEG is a terrible choice for digital artwork, PNG and SVG are so much better for this particular use case. I just thought it was amusing. :)
TIL there’s a JPEG logo, which in hindsight makes sense but i hadn’t thought of it
