• LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      17 days ago

      The worst part is they didn’t even remove a car lane for this. There’s literally no reason to remove it and the data prove it.

      • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        17 days ago

        Spite. Many people are no more emotionally advanced than a toddler. They’re mad about something (traffic, the looming spectre of mortality, queer people, being out of shape, whatever) so they lash out at whatever. Bike lanes are a symbol of things they don’t like, and easier to attack than the real sources of their unhappiness.

      • QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 days ago

        Is it wide enough to ge another lane for cars? Would that actually reduce traffic at all?

        Im not anti-car, but is there any benefit to this? It seems really unlikely

        • DrunkEngineer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          17 days ago

          While it is wide enough, it would be counterproductive for traffic flow to allow vehicular traffic there. The bridge currently has 2 lanes, and the highway beyond is also two lanes – so having a 3rd lane on the bridge would just lead to a zipper-merge situation that would back traffic up.