Hey, everyone. If you’re looking for a fresh privacy podcast, we recently started a new one called Signal Jam.

Here’s a bit about why we made Signal Jam and what we’re hoping to do differently.

We even have preliminary ways for you to participate in the project, which you can read about here.

Feel free to connect with us on Proton, Tuta, Signal, or here on Lemmy. Looking forward to your feedback and thoughts!

  • brownmustardminion@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    Do you have plans to make a Simplex group soon? You mentioned on the pod it’s where you two first met. Would love to chat and Simplex is the most private option imo.

    • signaljam@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Hey, there— we’re still open to it, but when we launch it depends on how much demand there is from the community. Realistically, we’ll probably wait a few more episodes down the line before we start one. Out of curiosity, do you use Signal, Matrix, or other platforms you think we should consider?

      -M

      • brownmustardminion@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        I use Signal but I keep signal use to personal IRL contacts. I don’t use Matrix as much anymore but if you have a matrix room I’d join in. I’m on the more advanced side of the privacy lifestyle so my communications are highly compartmentalized. Simplex is a bit clunky still but for smaller communities it’s not terrible.

        • signaljam@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          Totally respect the compartmentalization strategy. I’ll chat with Jay about this… maybe we’ll bump up the SimpleX timeline a bit.

          We’re trying to prioritize which platforms to start with since the project is so new. As we publish more content and resources, we’re hoping they bring real value to the community, and in turn widen our audience. Once that happens, it would make more sense to open up more channels to accommodate more folks. One thing at a time 🙂

  • TimLovesTech (AuDHD)(he/him)@badatbeing.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    Cool idea and will check it out later. I also found a small grammatical error.

    While we try strive to make original content and refresh old topics, we can’t cover everything, and we can’t be everywhere.

    I assume you would want to strike “try”, but I suppose you could strike “strive” instead.

    Edit - I made a word salad on a post about a grammatical error, go me!

    • signaljam@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      10 days ago

      Funny how sometimes you miss silly things like this even after proofreading so many times… thank you! Fixed. 🙂

    • signaljam@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 days ago

      Thank you! Feel free to leave us feedback and share what you’d like to hear more about down the road.

      • artyom@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        Listened to the first episode and I don’t have any negative feedback. You might consider running your audio through Auphonic. Really great hands-off editor that can take quality to another level. But it’s fine as is.

        • signaljam@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 days ago

          Thanks for the feedback and suggestion! I’ll look into Auphonic a bit and maybe do some experimenting.

          -M

  • rutrum@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    10 days ago

    Im glad you are not over ambitious with your schedule. An episode every three weeks / month is a great way to keep going. I remember when privacy guides said they were going to do a “this week in privacy” which unfortunately lasted about 6 weeks. I wish you best of luck!

    • signaljam@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 days ago

      Appreciate the feedback! We care about producing quality rather than quantity. As I mentioned in our Welcome post, we don’t view ourselves as content creators in the contemporary sense, and we don’t want that associated pressure to constantly pump out new stuff. We hope the project gains enough international relevancy and appeal that we can bring in other contributors (which might result in more frequent episodes/posts), but for now, slow and steady is the goal.

      -M

  • crank0271@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    10 days ago

    This looks cool. Thank you for creating and sharing! I’ve added to my (privacy-respecting, I think) podcast app of choice and will give a listen.

    • signaljam@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 days ago

      Thanks for following! Out of curiosity, what’s your preferred podcast client?

      • crank0271@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 days ago

        Well I just went down the rabbit hole to verify that my podcast app is simply that, and not tracking tons of data to send back to who knows where. I had been using Overcast but a few months ago changed to RSS Radio after reading a recommendation - perhaps on Reddit? RSS Radio now seems to be all but disavowed by both Dorada Software, who links from the site for it, and Maple Media Apps, LLC, who is the publisher on the app store. The app privacy cards on the iOS App Store do not instill a ton of confidence, showing: Data Used to Track You (Identifiers, Usage Data) and Data Linked to You (Usage Data)

        Perhaps it’s time to switch… Podverse is at least open source, although they track Usage Data and link Contact Info to you. But good ol’ Overcast only has a card for Data Not Linked to You, which seems like a big improvement.

          • crank0271@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            10 days ago

            I’m still on iOS (I know - don’t yell at me) but thinking to make moves soon. I trust Android less than iOS, but perhaps GrapheneOS or something else will be for me. I’m always open to recommendations (with a minimum of yelling).

            • signaljam@lemmy.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              10 days ago

              No stress! I was on iOS for a really long time, mostly out of entrenched habits, and trepidation into jumping into something like GrapheneOS. However, I did end up making the switch to Graphene, and arguably with the most restrictive settings (no Google Play Services, no Aurora Store, etc.). There was a small learning curve, maybe about a week or so, but in hind sight, it’s one of the best privacy decisions I’ve made to date. Feel free to reach out to me on Signal or one of emails if you have questions or want to talk more in depth about it!

              -M

        • signaljam@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 days ago

          Good on you for the thorough research, and I like your logic. Things change fast, and it’s good to have backups in place. Overcast would probably be my choice if using iOS. I wish there were more open source and privacy-friendly versions available.

          -M

      • clb92
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        I’m not the person you asked, but I self-host AudioBookShelf (it’s a podcast manager too), and listen to all my podcasts through its app, connected to my instance. Its app isn’t as sleek or fast as Antennapod or some or the other ones, but it works fine.

        That way I also automatically have all my podcasts backed up on my server too, if the creator of a podcast I listen to suddenly decides to delete everything and disappear.

        • signaljam@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          Ooooh, this is interesting, and I like the backup feature. Since you mention it…I have to ask… you don’t happen to have the coveted Episode 306 from Bazzell’s show, do you?

          -M

          • clb92
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            Nope, never heard of that podcast, sorry.

  • lock@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    9 days ago

    Shouldn’t the podcast about passwords and 2FA be called “Security 101” instead of “Privacy 101”? How is that related to privacy? You should have two sections for your episodes: one for privacy and one for security.

    • signaljam@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Totally valid point, and just to be ultra clear: yes, this episode was more security focused, technically speaking. Good privacy starts with good security. We’re hoping that newcomers to the space who are primarily interested in privacy as a topic start with that principle in mind. We tried, as best we could, to avoid dropping the word “privacy” throughout this episode in an effort to create that distinction.

      Thanks for the call out! You’re right to be mindful that these are related but separate concepts.

      -M

    • pineapple@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      I agree. Passwords and 2fa definetly leans more on the security side rather than privacy. It’s important to keep these two terms destinct.

    • appropriateghost@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 days ago

      It’s difficult enough for getting people to switch from whatsapp to signal.

      I don’t know how successful i’d be to get people to switch to simplex.

      Is there a particular reason that you don’t recommend signal?

    • signaljam@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      Hey, Arthur— thanks for dropping these links. Jay and I will look at these and consider your thought process, and might reach out to follow up, if that’s okay! If I may ask, what do you prefer for email and RTC?

      -M

      • Arthur Besse@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        For chat, something with e2ee and without phone numbers or centralized metadata. SimpleX, Matrix, XMPP, etc - each have their own problems, but at least they aren’t centralizing everyone’s metadata with a CIA contractor like Jeff Bezos like Signal is.

        For email, I’d recommend finding small-to-medium-sized operators who seem both honest and competent. Anyone offering snakeoil privacy features such as browser-based e2ee is failing in at least one of those two categories.

        • signaljam@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          We’re considering moving up our timeline on a SimpleX and Matrix chat as we’ve received interest from others about that, too. Keep an eye on our website or show notes as we’ll update those when new chat channels open up.

          As for email, are there specific providers you recommend we look at?

          -M

    • pineapple@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 days ago

      I think signal, proton and tuta are totally fine for most peoples threat model unless they feel they need the extra privacy.

      If we want everyone to value privacy then we need to onboard them with easy to use and accessible services first and then they can take steps further if they want.