• foofiepie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    2 days ago

    The word is “Shylock”, just to save you a click.

    I had no idea that was a slur, but it makes sense I guess.

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      It sometimes is. The character Shylock was Jewish. He was also someone who loaned money at high interest rates.

      Trump was talking about borrowing money, not about Jews. So in that context, probably not antisemitic. Though given the audience, it could be a dog whistle.

      It’s mostly a nothing burger.

      So just another case of attacking Trump on something unimportant and diverting attention from the actual terrible things he’s doing.

    • TheReturnOfPEB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      But do you claim to be as smart as Trump claims to be ? Because it seems that smartest, biggest most beautiful brained leaders these days do not know Shakespearean references.

    • markovs_gun@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      I have noticed it’s kind of common for older people to say this and not know the origins or antisemitic connotations. If someone who was Trump’s age but a little bit smarter said this, I would think maybe it was intentional but since he’s such an idiot there’s a decent chance he really didn’t know ot was offensive. As much as I hate Trump and all he stands for, I can believe this one was truly accidental.

        • markovs_gun@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          This one is just super common with old people not thinking through that it might be offensive though. Pretty much all my older relatives use this one occasionally and none of them would be intentionally anti-semitic. Trump isn’t a god of manipulation or anything, he’s an idiot who has the wealth and charisma to make everyone think he’s not an idiot. By ascribing this intelligence and intention to him, you’re kind of falling into right wing propaganda by unknowingly accepting the false premises they are selling to all of us. Trump is an idiot who doesn’t think things through when he says them. His advisors do think things through and do have a lot more intelligence and intention to their words and actions, but Trump himself does not.

          • Lady Butterfly she/her@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            I agree with you he definitely doesn’t think things through. I also agree he’s using a generational word. I personally think he’s got anti social personality disorder and at the very least he’s a documented dv abuser, they’re manipulative. They can be thick as fuck, but with good manipulation skills

      • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Any time you use a word for a racial/religious group that is not their own chosen preferred name (in this case “Jews” or "Hebrew"s) you’re running a very high risk of stepping into slur territory. This isn’t unique to older generations but they seem to have a harder time understanding it.

        • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          22 hours ago

          I remember flinching when hearing older generations (like Greatest Generation and Silent Generation) using terms like getting “gypped” and having someone “jew them out” of something. Took me longer to figure out the gypped connection, but using Jew as a verb? Wow.

          • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            22 hours ago

            When I was a kid, everyone was “fag”. It was the go-to catchall insult. It’s been hard to rewire my brain to stop doing that. So I kind of get it to an extent. If you never stop and think about these things they just seem normal.

            • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              21 hours ago

              I remember those days. I also remember when people would call things/people “gay” as kind of a generic thing, even if it was not remotely about something that was actually gay, even into the 90s. As a kid, I remember a common game was called “smear the queer”…I also remember a common insult was calling someone a “woman”, and “throwing like a girl” and so on. What a world. I suppose this kind of thing still goes on a lot, probably most behind closed doors? My parents never had a lot of tolerance for any of it, but they were definitely in the minority on saying anything about it where I grew up (very rural). My mother especially didn’t go in for that misogyny stuff.

              I honestly think a lot of people are so resistant to any change at all that requires even the lowest amount of effort (simply not using certain words) and these are some that voted for Taco in the hopes their lazy asses could go back to not having to keep this behind closed doors any more. These are the people that howled about “PC” in the 90s, bitched about Obama “fundamentally changing” America, whined about wearing a mask and getting vaccinated, and screeched about “DEI” and “CRT” and people being “woke” and others getting “cancelled”. Some of them are surely hateful, but I also think a lot of them are just really fucking lazy. Not saying a word or a phrase when it’s obviously hurtful? A bridge too far.

    • JaymesRS@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 days ago

      For those unaware of the origin, It’s a name of a Jewish moneylender character in The Merchant of Venice by Shakespeare.

    • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      52
      ·
      2 days ago

      Because it’s not about the Jews. It was never about the Jews. It was always about using a scapegoat that’s enough of a minority to be bullied, but not enough of a minority that they practically don’t exist.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Yep, but it’s even more than that.

        American Christian Zionism is not a pro-Jewish policy. It is about (a) getting rid of the Jews by getting them to all go back to the Holy Land, and more importantly, (b) triggering the “End Times,” for which the Jews returning to the Holy Land is a prerequisite. American Christian Zionists do not give a flying fuck about Jews; they’re just delusional racist death-cultists who think they’re gonna get “Raptured.”

        • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Hey, according to their stupid death cult’s myths, 144,000 Jews convert and are “saved”, so…are they not merciful in their weird psychotic fantasies?

          These people think they are the good ones, too. That’s what so deranged. What they look forward to with much happiness, is having a front-row seat to eternal torture of others. That is so very sick and twisted. That’s the mind of a person that would torture animals for fun. There is something wrong with this mindset. This kind of thing almost makes me wish for a world like Greg Bear’s Queen of Angels where people like this are fixed.

    • Eldritch@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      2 days ago

      Because nationalist groups when they aren’t pitted against each other have a lot in common. It’s why Trump likes Bibi, Xi and Putin.

      Wealthy German Zionists, negotiated Haavara with Hitler. Breaking solidarity and boycotts against his regime to emigrate to Palestine. Ostensibly to save German Jews. Though ultimately only those that were Zionist and wealthy got to take much advantage of it.

      Post war Zionists manipulated international sympathies to make official claims to Palestine and seize control from the people who had actually lived there generations, displacing them. Much as Hitler had done to them. Initially there were many other places discussed to relocate many Jews after the war. It wasn’t always just Palestine. But the nationalists demanded Palestine.

      Nationalist are scum and always have been.

    • Jerb322@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      What was it? Something about being the “good guy” so long, you become the “bad guy”

  • alexc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 days ago

    I don’t know why people are surprised by this.its not his first time and we all know he’s never read a book in his life.

    • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      2 days ago

      we all know he’s never read a book in his life.

      That’s what I came to say, too. Not only does he not read, but he’s not smart enough to remember the character nor understand the implications. We know he hasn’t read a lick of Shakespeare. So where the fuck else would he know this term from other than antisemitism?

      • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Didnt his ex wife say he used to keep a copy of Mein Kampf that he himself said he liked to read because he admitted his speeches. Never read it, so it could be possible the term was learned from that

          • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            24 hours ago

            That makes sense, apparently I typed admitted instead of admired as well. Never studied his speeches either. While one would think speeches wouldn’t include slurs, hard to say when the writer is going for the whole racial cleansing thing.

        • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          2 days ago

          Possible, but if there’s one thing that’s been shown about Trump during his life in the media, it’s that he has a near encyclopedic knowledge of all the racist slurs. He pulls out some real obscure ones, and that was even before he even ran for office.

          • logicbomb@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            On the other hand, Trump plead ignorance, and I would never bet against his ignorance.

            And, if he did know the slur, I’d be surprised that we haven’t heard it until now. As you know, he’s not shy about saying them.