• brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    Not in niche games. Rimworld and Stellaris (for instance) are dramatically faster on Windows, hence I keep a partition around. I’m talking 40%ish better simulation speeds vs Linux native (and still a hit with Proton, though much less).

    Minecraft and Starsector, on the other hand, freaking love Linux. They’re dramatically faster.

    These are kinda extreme scenarios, but the point is AAA benchmarks don’t necessarily apply to the spectrum of games across hardware, especially once you start looking at simulation heavy ones.

    • RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Minecraft and Starsector, on the other hand, freaking love Linux. They’re dramatically faster.

      Vanilla Minecraft, maybe, but vanilla Minecraft can run on two potatoes and a rusty spoon.

      Running with shaders, there’s a noticeable performance hit on Linux - I drop 20-30 FPS in Mint with the latest Nvidia drivers. Going from ~80 FPS to ~50 is noticeable.

      In vanilla Minecraft, going from 300 FPS to 350 FPS is kinda moot.

      • accideath@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        56 minutes ago

        Maybe a bit of a nvidia on linux being kinda meh thing. On my AMD card, mods n shaders run terribly in Windows but the same mods n settings in Linux are perfectly smooth.

      • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I was testing heavily modded Minecraft, specifically Enigmatica, which chugs even on beefy PCs.

        Out of curiosity, what mod are you running for shaders, specifically? That may have an effect.