A condom is not going to get elected.

To be fair, Newsom is sorta right, but Newsom’s also kinda slimey, self-serving and angling for a presidential run. I don’t want him to be the next Dem pres candidate…

Also, Trump has always been Trump. Stupid sounding hot air is his thing, way before politics.

Uhh… Tool calling is built into thier tokenizers, but Ollama/Langchain just ignore them because they’re spagetti abstractions. To be blunt, langchain and ollama are overhyped, buggy junk trying to reinvent wheels.

For any kind of STEM work, I’d run Llama Nemotron 49B exl3 via TabbyAPI, which exposes a generic openai endpoint anything can use:

https://huggingface.co/nvidia/Llama-3_3-Nemotron-Super-49B-v1

https://huggingface.co/turboderp/Llama-3.3-Nemotron-Super-49B-v1-exl3/tree/3.0bpw

Nemotron models freaking rock at anything STEM-adjacent, and I can get squeeze in 48K+ context on 24GB VRAM (depending on your cache quantization settings).

Otherwise GLM-4 is very good at tool calling, as is Qwen3, and you can more confortable run them as GGUFs if you don’t want to leave the llama.cpp ecosystem, or exl2s if you have specific trouble with exl3 in TabbyAPI.

Pretty sure that’s not how it works. Water is mixed with a soup of stuff the moment it goes in your body, and our digestive system/diet is not as simple as osmotic pressure pushing water into cells (and somehow pushing other substances out?) if that’s what you’re getting at.

It’s almost like that was exactly what they said they do, and what keeps happening over and over again… not that you’re wrong.

Agreed.

I almost feel like the discussion about her is bot farms creating that discussion.

Close. It’s chum. It’s rage bait. It’s an engagement farm that suck people in, which is exactly how influencers like Trump climbed to the top of the world. It’s true, but it doesn’t change that raging against Rowling online helps Rowling, when the best form of protest would be to turn her into “she who shall not be named”

Be wary attributing to bots what can be attributed to the failure of “don’t feed the trolls”

Russia: President, our population is aging! We’re suffering from a brain drain and an isolated, undiversified economy that can’t exploit our vast natural resources in the long term! How should we address this!?

Putin: Rubs chin contemplatively. Why don’t we kill all our young men by invading our culturally similar neighbor, even if it goes bad? Oh, and kidnap and bomb a few children to make it look good on the international stage. Perhaps we should become a Chinese vassal like North Korea… Yes, do that.

Russia: flashbacks intensify

US: Looks on enviously. Looks at vast resources, aging population kept young by immigration, and friendly neighbors. Nods. Can we do that?

US Voters: Hold our beer!

Sorry (but not sorry), the war is indeed awful.

As much as I’d love for Mastadon to supplant Facebook tomorrow or whatever, maybe slow growth is healthier? The Fediverse (or similar) can outlast enshittification cycles.

I don’t want to be ungrateful complaining that they dont give us everything.

For sure.

But I guess it’s still kinda… interesting? Like you’d think Qwen3, Gemma 3, Falcon H1, Nemotron 49B and such would pressure them to release Medium, but I guess there are factors that help them sell it.

As stupid as this is, they’re European and specifically not Chinese. In the business world, there’s this mostly irrational fear that the Deepseek or Qwen weights by themselves will jump out of their cage and hack you, heh.

Yeah I think that’s a perfectly reasonable sentiment, and I despise frying that as a political purity test. Rowling is probably being platformed by all this by some extent… Any attention is good attention these days.

Shit, I hope JK doesn’t use it to run for some kind of office.

The utter popularity of Harry Potter (and the royalties she rakes in) undoubtedly dwarfs any personal name recognition/brand she ever achieves though. Like, it’s insanely popular.

You misinterpreted my, to be fair, vague statement. I meant AA is seemingly a bad source to read about opposition parties like the PKK, because of the obvious conflict of interest.

I mean, AP is a pretty decent source. It’s a nonprofit coop stretching back to 1846 in a country with, err, could-be-worse press freedom history, while AA has been explicitly state run since 1920, somewhat akin to VOA, BBC, Al Jazeera or RT I guess.

And yes, I know, AP is still an objectively bad source for specific topics, you don’t have to drill that in. So would whoever shills for the PKK, in some respects. But I’m not playing the game of “they did this and this, they can’t be trusted like them and them!” either. One has to look for conflict of interests everywhere, but it’s also okay to respect the good work long running institutions have done (like AA and this article).

What if they need to hire to fight spam? What if they need to pay for legal?

Just saying, it can get complicated real quick.

Normally I’d agree, but Harry Potter is already huge.

And while I think this whole response is a bit extreme, it is a case of her source of wealth being way more famous than herself.

Not really, heh.

There are different degrees though, and different environments for each one, which is what I meant to convey. Like, AA is a better source for Gaza information than, say, Turkish political opposition parties.

Could happen. Imagine the hosting costs of .world exploding if it becomes too big a target.

I’m pretty sure I got shadow banned twice for just linking Lemmy?

AFAIK it’s mostly not Redditors themselves, but the system they’re stuck in.

Sorry, but… why link mediaite instead of the original source?

https://poll.qu.edu/poll-release?releaseid=3924

It’s title/writing is more grounded, and it’s the source of the poll.

Interesting source. It’s basically a nationalized Turkish outlet:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anadolu_Agency

After the Justice and Development Party (AKP) took power, AA and the Turkish Radio and Television Corporation (TRT) were both restructured to more closely reflect the administration line. According to a 2016 academic article, “these public news producers, especially during the most recent term of the AKP government, have been controlled by officials from a small network close to the party leadership.”

Still, the writing is flat in a good way? I have found that reporting from politically captured sources (say, RT) can be conspicuously good, if it’s on an international subject that aligns with their incentives. For instance, Turkey’s AKP is no fan of Netanyahu, hence AA is motivated to produce (seemingly) original reporting like this.

They’re still holding back bigger ones, unfortunately.