• martin4598@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    1 day ago

    Are 2000 pounder JDAM dropped on gazan civilian buildings more moral than a cluster bomb?

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      It depends on who sold it to them. If it was one president, centrists love it. If it’s another president, they still love it but have to pretend they don’t so they can blame people to their left.

    • Machinist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      The moral calculus of bombs is a truly fucked up thing.

      If the JDAM is driving a single conventional warhead, it is more ethical than a cluster bomb.

      It is common for some of the cluster bomblets to not detonate creating unknown minefields that persist for decades. A single bomb only goes off once.

      (This is the ethics of the bomb, not the conflict they’re used in)

      • outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        Okay but if it hits a full apartment building, 100% of that bomb goes to killing unaware civilians.

        Which is the whole reason cluster munitions are bad.

        • dustyData@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 day ago

          Any weapon fired at a civilian is a war crime. It doesn’t matter what kind of munition was used. The problem with cluster bombs is that the shooting party, cannot control the result. Signatories of IHL have a responsibility to minimize damage to civilian people and assets. The same reason autonomous weapons are a huge ethical problem.

          • outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            And im saying: is firing indiscriminately with no regard to hitting civilians, now or in 50 years, worse than trying to make sure 100% of a bomb kills as many civiliams and as much of their infrastructure as possible?

      • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        Excuse me, the preferred nomenclature is “hamas bunkers” and I’ll report you to the ADL if you continue with your antisemitism.

        Most unnecessary /s ever.