During a Tuesday hearing at the 9th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, the DOJ urged a three-judge panel to issue an emergency stay of a lower court order and allow the Trump administration’s deployment of the California National Guard to continue in Los Angeles — going so far as to argue a president’s federalization of militia can’t be second-guessed by the courts, even if the chief executive mobilized forces from all 50 states and Washington, D.C., simultaneously.

  • floofloof@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    195
    ·
    1 day ago

    The DOJ attorney emphasized that “sustained mob violence” in response to ICE raids is “no ordinary civil unrest,” claimed that it is ongoing, and asserted that such violence is “expressly aimed at preventing federal officers from enforcing federal law,” supporting Trump’s federalization of the Golden State’s National Guard.

    That’s just a lie, isn’t it?

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Fuck these feckless attorneys who are willing to do this shit.

      They should never be able to work again after this. At best. Many belong in prison.

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      56
      ·
      1 day ago

      That’s standard Republican strategy. A lot of the cases that ended up in front of the Supreme Court are straight up manufactured. In the case of the lady who refused to create a website for a gay wedding, they contacted the guy who supposedly made the request and he’d never heard of it before. Republican operatives basically looked up a gay guy in San Francisco and used his details in the website’s contact form.

      Despite all that, the courts happily took the case and ruled on a complete fiction. Same thing happened in the case of the coach that forced his football team to pray.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Same with the student loan forgiveness. The one alleged plaintiff, MOHELA literally wanted nothing to do with the lawsuit and were just used so it appeared legitimate.

    • Nougat@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      68
      ·
      1 day ago

      Even if it were true, that does not amount to rebellion. Nobody is trying to overthrow the federal government.

      Yet.

    • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      Well, it’s mostly true. I mean this isn’t normal civil unrest. This is the people being fed up with a government trying to use fear as a weapon against it’s own people. And the mob violence isn’t generally preventing federal officers from doing what they want, it is in response to it. There is some mob shouting preventing some federal officers ftom doing what they want.

      But issue at hand is that the law is very vague about the quantity needed to trigger the allowance of using the national guard. By just reading it, ICE could send a single agent to arrest 5 people in a facility that has 500. If the people stop the arrests, then it meets the written requirements. It ludicrous though to interpret it that way of course. But since it was written so poorly, we are at the mercy of the courts.