• I thought briefly about editing that to say, “in this context”, but I thought it might be redundant.

    It’s like the whole fruit/vegetable debate, and there not really being a scientific category of “vegetables” that aligns with the common usage. However, in common usage, the loose, lay definition of “vegetable” is far more useful than the scientific, taxonomical one.

    Context is king.

    • naught101@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Yeah. I’ve had this discussing with others in different forms, where they are arguing that words have specific definitions…

      I would go even further… My take is that what you said is right, but also, what a given context (like “cooking”) is can be very different for different people… So even in situations where three is really only one meaning for a word (rare, but maybe “broccoli” is an example), the word is understood differently by different people because it has different connotations attached for everyone (e.g. “I love/hate it”, “my grandparent used to cook it badly”).

      Word definitions are like the lowest common denominator consensus version of those individual meaning, but they are changing slightly all the time as people change. Dictionaries are just documenting that evolution, but are constantly playing catch-up.