Sure, but that was about Elon’s brother. Surely if Elon was involved with Epstein there will be evidence; it’s not like he was shy about being photographed.
This guilty by association stuff feels like an witch trial evidence, when there’s plenty of stuff to hang Elon with that he did himself.
Sure, but that was about Elon’s brother. Surely if Elon was involved with Epstein there will be evidence; it’s not like he was shy about being photographed.
This guilty by association stuff feels like an witch trial evidence, when there’s plenty of stuff to hang Elon with that he did himself.
My guy, you don’t need guilt by association to find people who have accused Elon of being a sex pest.
https://www.businessinsider.com/spacex-paid-250000-to-a-flight-attendant-who-accused-elon-musk-of-sexual-misconduct-2022-5
Why are you pretending otherwise?
I’m not. Don’t put words in my mouth.
Someone posted a picture of an article about Elon’s brother. Elon’s brother’s sons are not Elon’s. Hunter’s crimes are not Joe’s.
Elon’s absolutely a sex pest; why are you trying to prove it with an article about his brother?
Not OP here- Did you miss the second half of the sentence of theirs you quoted?
Do people think we won’t remember the second half of the sentence lmao like who does op think he’s fooling