FenrirIII@lemmy.world to Political Memes@lemmy.world · 20 hours agoFight or flightlemmy.worldimagemessage-square145linkfedilinkarrow-up11.17Karrow-down134
arrow-up11.13Karrow-down1imageFight or flightlemmy.worldFenrirIII@lemmy.world to Political Memes@lemmy.world · 20 hours agomessage-square145linkfedilink
minus-squareSaleh@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down4·11 hours agoWho was president from 2009 to 2017 and could have passed a different law? Who was president from 2021 to 2025?
minus-squarefinitebanjo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down2·edit-211 hours agoTo overrule the SCOTUS interpretation of the constitution you would need to amend the constitution, required 60 Senators and a house majority. Since 2013 there haven’t even been more dems than repubs before caucus, much less 60.
minus-squareWhatAmLemmy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down2·4 hours agoDoes that mean they could have overturned it between 2010-2013, but didn’t?
minus-squarefinitebanjo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-23 hours agoThey never had 60 votes. They had a 58 + 2 ind caucus for 72 days and chose to use that time to expand medicaid to millions of americans. The last time the DNC had 60 seats if I recall was 1979?
Who was president from 2009 to 2017 and could have passed a different law? Who was president from 2021 to 2025?
To overrule the SCOTUS interpretation of the constitution you would need to amend the constitution, required 60 Senators and a house majority. Since 2013 there haven’t even been more dems than repubs before caucus, much less 60.
Does that mean they could have overturned it between 2010-2013, but didn’t?
They never had 60 votes. They had a 58 + 2 ind caucus for 72 days and chose to use that time to expand medicaid to millions of americans.
The last time the DNC had 60 seats if I recall was 1979?