• LandedGentry@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    Same and I have no interest in a truck. It just looks so functional and useful.

    • hobovision@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      10 hours ago

      That’s got to be like a 3 foot bed? I just don’t get how that’s useful vs a hatchback with the seats down?

      • LandedGentry@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        Completely open top, much less restriction on what you can put in. Hatchbacks can’t do that. It’s just a large trunk. Presumably can also sustain heavier loads.

        • hobovision@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 hours ago

          I’m now imagining a bundle of 2x4s vertically sticking up 6 feet.

          I think I’ve only once or twice had something not fit the hatchback because the roof was too low. And those items wouldn’t have fit in a 3-4 foot bed either. Plus a proper hatchback should have roof racks to put oversize cargo on anyway.

          I’m not arguing a 5+ foot bed isn’t better than a hatch (my 97 Taco with 6 foot bed comes in handy sometimes), but the shorty beds make me laugh.

      • 5in1k@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Hatchbacks fucking suck compared to a similar sized truck for transport.