OK Microsoft was 10 years old when they made excel, I’ll chalk that down to the exception that confirms the rule.
Microsoft was 33 years old when Android was created. So obviously way beyond the first 20 years.
But already with Excel it was created using monopoly money they gained from IBM choosing the stolen MS DOS over CP/M it was stolen from.
Please note Microsoft can’t sue for libel for me claiming DOS was stolen, that’s already determined in a court of law.
I have no idea why anyone would jump to the rescue of that scumbag company, that has caused half a century of security issues in computing, by removing the few security functions that were actually there in CP/M.
IBM gave us the worst possible OS, and we got stuck with a talent-less Microsoft with no regard for quality, as the world leading software company, because Microsoft relentlessly exploited their DOS monopoly to make competing software fail.
But it was very fitting, because the PC was a god awful computer with extreme latency, a base design that made PC impossible to use for anything real time. The computer was hampered on purpose by IBM to segment the market.
But because of the power of IBM combined with cheap compatible clones, and the availability of MS-DOS for them, the worst computer with the worst OS became the industry standard.
Hence the biggest innovation of Microsoft was their license with IBM, which secured Microsoft an extreme advantage never before seen in the software industry.
OK Microsoft was 10 years old when they made excel, I’ll chalk that down to the exception that confirms the rule.
Microsoft was 33 years old when Android was created. So obviously way beyond the first 20 years.
But already with Excel it was created using monopoly money they gained from IBM choosing the stolen MS DOS over CP/M it was stolen from.
Please note Microsoft can’t sue for libel for me claiming DOS was stolen, that’s already determined in a court of law.
I have no idea why anyone would jump to the rescue of that scumbag company, that has caused half a century of security issues in computing, by removing the few security functions that were actually there in CP/M.
IBM gave us the worst possible OS, and we got stuck with a talent-less Microsoft with no regard for quality, as the world leading software company, because Microsoft relentlessly exploited their DOS monopoly to make competing software fail.
But it was very fitting, because the PC was a god awful computer with extreme latency, a base design that made PC impossible to use for anything real time. The computer was hampered on purpose by IBM to segment the market.
But because of the power of IBM combined with cheap compatible clones, and the availability of MS-DOS for them, the worst computer with the worst OS became the industry standard.
Hence the biggest innovation of Microsoft was their license with IBM, which secured Microsoft an extreme advantage never before seen in the software industry.