• Lembot_0002@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    4 days ago

    Couldn’t the woman just say that the raccoon is just a passenger and she has no responsibility for it?

    • HumanPenguin@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 days ago

      Def sounds like the trail of evidence is weak.

      Unless the racoon was caged or on a lead. Surly the defence will claim it found the stuff and dragged it into the car.

      Even if the driver has a history etc. seems the racoon is all sorts of reasonable doubt.

      • AZERTY@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        However, a subsequent search revealed that Vidal’s car contained a bulk amount of methamphetamine, crack cocaine and three used glass methamphetamine pipes, police said.

        She’s cooked bro. She has paperwork claiming the raccoon as a pet and it holding a meth pipe on bodycam allowed probable cause to justify the search. Fuck the police but they’re unfortunately probably going to get the conviction.

        • Nougat@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          4 days ago

          Furthermore:

          … whose registered owner had an active warrant and a suspended driver’s license, …

          The possibility of the pipe-wielding raccoon having acquired the pipe independently and without the driver’s knowledge doesn’t invalidate the search that found all the drugs. The active warrant is enough.