• nuko147@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      13 hours ago

      It was easier than what came after, but riskier too (Farming required 12+ hour days). Also if you remove the workers rights that exist today, the modern human can not comprehend how hard survival was even 100 years ago.

    • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Eh… it’s hard now because we don’t have the patterns or training or tools anymore. Previous people were well prepared.

      Now, it was RISKY. People died all the time. But that doesn’t mean they worked 20 hour days.

      • Jax@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        … this is such a reductionist view of human survival that my head is beginning to hurt trying to come up with an answer to it.

        • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Yeah, we don’t have the tools for day to day survivalist life en masse. That’s why it feels hard.

          We also don’t have the tools to cut marble by hand using copper. Because why would we? They aren’t needed so no one is making them.

          Knowledge gets lost when it’s no longer relevant. This isn’t news.

          • beejboytyson@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 hours ago

            That’s not true. I’ve literally seen someone make a 1 ton brick by hand.

            It’s this nostalgia of a simpler time that’s actually toxic. Tribal societies would always adapt new tech. BECAUSE it helped survivability.