• ipha@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Shouldn’t affect them much, it just means they’ll need a single RHEL subscription.

    • caron@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It would count as an unauthorized use of the subscription, so Red Hat wouldn’t keep doing business with them, and wouldn’t receive new binaries.

      • ipha@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        That sounds like a giant GPL violation if sources are provided under the condition that you don’t use them.

      • ipha@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Legally they must provide source to anyone they provide binaries to.