• JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Literally though. And there’s a whole practice of hostile architecture that makes it harder and more uncomfortable to be homeless.

      • Obi@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 year ago

        The point of hostile architecture isn’t to solve homelessness, just to send them to the next block/town over (not saying you don’t understand that, just pointing it out).

        • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          I wonder if hostile architecture also kills people. Increasing exposure to cold and reducing opportunities to rest doesn’t seem good for your chances for survival. I guess that would solve homelessness, but in the worst most morbid way possible.

          • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            You’re absolutely right in your suspicion. Like so many “let’s punish the poor and vulnerable so they’ll stop being poor and vulnerable” policies that people think are just a “righteous” inconvenience, hostile architecture DOES kill people.

            It’s social murder just so the more fortunate don’t have to look at the consequences of an unjust system.

          • kamenLady.@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            The most morbid way i heard about was in the news, when i lived in Brasil. Store owners used to pay police officers to get rid of the homeless disturbing their business in Rio de Janeiro.

            Carried out at night, organized & stealthy, most victims were kids.

            I don’t remember if someone really went to jail for this. That was in the 80s, like 20 years ago.