• itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    23 hours ago

    That’s an oversimplification. Skilled archers, especially in numbers, are a force to be reckoned with. For example:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Agincourt

    Or think of horse archers. The mongols used them to great effect, and the Romans lost 7 legions against them, despite their testudo supposedly being next to invincible against projectiles

    Volleys do have their place, but mostly as a way to open the battle, and at long range. You are correct that that can often be used to provide breathing room for troop movement. However, once the fighting starts, archers usually start picking individual targets and fire at will

    • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Yes. There’s no doubt that the English longbows were a force to themselves. They were lethal in piercing armour but they were still used in generally the same manner. To open up the battle by forcing the enemy to take a defensive stance and “thinning the herd” (so to speak) before your own infantry engages their forces.

      Once the infantry engaged however, you didn’t want to be raining down arrows on your own men and so the purpose of the archers largely changes to a completely different purpose; controlling the flow of battle with strategic use of volleys.

      And yes…the Mongols changed everything with their horse archers. There’s a reason a good part of the population is descended from Genghis Khan…