• RadicalEagle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    I think it’s a mistake to think that donating $50,000 to a charitable organization in 5 years is more important or “better” than buying $100 of groceries for someone who needs it today.

    This person isn’t trying to maximize the amount of “good” they can do, they’re trying to minimize what it will cost them because they’re greedy and unwilling to actually give something of themselves.

    “Giving all you have” doesn’t have to mean taking all of your money and possessions and just giving them to someone. It can also mean earnestly engaging with the idea that we’re here to serve and elevate each other, and having faith that in doing so we will create a better world.

    • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      I think it’s a mistake to think that buying $100 of groceries for 500 people is more important or “better” than buying $100 of groceries for one person

      If your goal is to eliminate hunger it’s a hell of a lot more effective

        • njm1314@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          Don’t forget by accumulating massive wealth he’s going to be damaging people all around the world right now. You can’t accumulate that type of wealth without exploiting workers. His hypothetical accumulation of wealth is literally creating poverty and inequality.