I think it’s a mistake to think that buying $100 of groceries for 500 people is more important or “better” than buying $100 of groceries for one person
If your goal is to eliminate hunger it’s a hell of a lot more effective
Don’t forget by accumulating massive wealth he’s going to be damaging people all around the world right now. You can’t accumulate that type of wealth without exploiting workers. His hypothetical accumulation of wealth is literally creating poverty and inequality.
If your goal is to eliminate hunger it’s a hell of a lot more effective
*if your goal is to eliminate hunger in a hypothetical future 5 years from now.
Don’t forget by accumulating massive wealth he’s going to be damaging people all around the world right now. You can’t accumulate that type of wealth without exploiting workers. His hypothetical accumulation of wealth is literally creating poverty and inequality.
Unless you believe hunger will be solved in the next 5 years it’s not really all that hypothetical