If there’s one thing I’d hoped people had learned going into the next four years of Donald Trump as president, it’s that spending lots of time online posting about what people in power are saying and doing is not going to accomplish anything. If anything, it’s exactly what they want.

Many of my journalist colleagues have attempted to beat back the tide under banners like “fighting disinformation” and “accountability.” While these efforts are admirable, the past few years have changed my own internal calculus. Thinkers like Jean-Paul Sartre and Hannah Arendt warned us that the point of this deluge is not to persuade, but to overwhelm and paralyze our capacity to act. More recently, researchers have found that the viral outrage disseminated on social media in response to these ridiculous claims actually reduces the effectiveness of collective action. The result is a media environment that keeps us in a state of debilitating fear and anger, endlessly reacting to our oppressors instead of organizing against them.

Cross’ book contains a meticulous catalog of social media sins which many people who follow and care about current events are probably guilty of—myself very much included. She documents how tech platforms encourage us, through their design affordances, to post and seethe and doomscroll into the void, always reacting and never acting.

But perhaps the greatest of these sins is convincing ourselves that posting is a form of political activism, when it is at best a coping mechanism—an individualist solution to problems that can only be solved by collective action. This, says Cross, is the primary way tech platforms atomize and alienate us, creating “a solipsism that says you are the main protagonist in a sea of NPCs.”

In the days since the inauguration, I’ve watched people on Bluesky and Instagram fall into these same old traps. My timeline is full of reactive hot takes and gotchas by people who still seem to think they can quote-dunk their way out of fascism—or who know they can’t, but simply can’t resist taking the bait. The media is more than willing to work up their appetites. Legacy news outlets cynically chase clicks (and ad dollars) by disseminating whatever sensational nonsense those in power are spewing.

This in turn fuels yet another round of online outrage, edgy takes, and screenshots exposing the “hypocrisy” of people who never cared about being seen as hypocrites, because that’s not the point. Even violent fantasies about putting billionaires to the guillotine are rendered inept in these online spaces—just another pressure release valve to harmlessly dissipate our rage instead of compelling ourselves to organize and act.

This is the opposite of what media, social or otherwise, is supposed to do. Of course it’s important to stay informed, and journalists can still provide the valuable information we need to take action. But this process has been short-circuited by tech platforms and a media environment built around seeking reaction for its own sake.

“For most people, social media gives you this sense that unless you care about everything, you care about nothing. You must try to swallow the world while it’s on fire,” said Cross. “But we didn’t evolve to be able to absorb this much info. It makes you devalue the work you can do in your community.”

It’s not that social media is fundamentally evil or bereft of any good qualities. Some of my best post-Twitter moments have been spent goofing around with mutuals on Bluesky, or waxing romantic about the joys of human creativity and art-making in an increasingly AI-infested world. But when it comes to addressing the problems we face, no amount of posting or passive info consumption is going to substitute the hard, unsexy work of organizing.

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      30 minutes ago

      Even people agreeing with this are wary of any revolution which is not in some way being televised. And more trusting to television than to what they can see with their own eyes.

  • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    I can’t upvote this strongly enough. Social media is doing everything in the establishment’s favor - especially ingraining the habit of glancing at a news item and making an instant value judgement with minimal thought before scrolling along to the next item. It’s not just that endless scrolling and venting take time away from real action, it’s the encouragement of superficial thinking. People who get all their info from memes are solid gold to con men like Trump who depend on triggering stupid conclusions. They got conservatives to worship him by not thinking too much, and they can do the same to liberals.

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      28 minutes ago

      They have done the same to liberals, just in a different way. Why do the harder thing when the easier thing is just as good? Most liberals already believe bullshit just as convenient for Trump.

      How you support or not support an idea is not less important than what is that idea.

    • Dasus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I agree.

      “Planet’s burning up, another genocide, fascism on the rise… ugh… where are the funny memes.”

      Apathy is the greatest tool of the oppressor.

    • Toribor@corndog.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      After working with computer software most of my life I’ve come to understand that if success relies on people ‘paying attention to something, making an informed decision and then performing an action’ that it is nearly impossible to get the desired outcome more than half the time.

      We’re so fucked.

      • skittle07crusher@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Also in that field, but… I think you have to acknowledge that being, usually, in your example 1) at work and 2) on a computer, make people that much less interested in giving a shit. Compare to various systems people use in their free time, and you probably see that people are pretty good at attending to the things they think matter.

        Capitalism, or, at the very very least, unfettered capitalism, are the real problem, not people writ large.

      • CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Agreed. After 30 years working in IT for various companies from 40 employees to 300,000 employees, I believe about 70-80% of the corporate work force has an elementary school level of reading comprehension at best.

        In the last 10 years of my career I stopped writing emails with more than 1 question, because otherwise most people would reply and only answer the first thing I asked (often poorly), ignoring the entire rest of the email.

        • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 hours ago

          I mean 54% read at or below a 6th grade level, so that makes sense. Almost a fifth to a half of adult Americans are functionally illiterate depending on how you define it.

  • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I’m afraid you can’t vote or protest your way out of fascism. Only way out is to shoot.

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I’m on lemmy. Just got back from working with firearms at my camp today.

        Turns out some mags need oiled, a dead scope battery (no extras on hand!), new shotgun strikes light, need to adjust the trigger pull (again), new 10-round AR mags are a dream, not sure about the red-dot, but it puts steel on target as far as I’m able to shoot.

        As always my Colt 1911 Government Model is flawless with every mag. Compact Ruger 9mm fired flawlessly, hard to aim a 2.75" barrel. About my crappiest gun, the Taurus Spectrum, actually ran perfectly. Weirder things have happened. (It always runs perfectly, just jams on the last round, every time.)

        Rotated out some old ammo, had more than I thought! Guess I was being extra conservative on holding. :)

    • CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      6 hours ago

      You are correct. These people won’t be stopped with words or rational arguments. They are past the point of being able to cooperate. We will be killing each other before long. Sorry to say, but if you don’t have the tools and skills to do that, you might want to learn. Or be prepared to be owned or killed by those that do. Adolph Musk and crew want to OWN you or DESTROY you depending on how you look. Start preparing for what that means.

      I fucking hate that it’s coming to this, but without a major change of direction (that I see no evidence of yet) that’s where this ends up. The red menace was in our own country the whole time.

      I am an infantry veteran and I will be fighting on the correct side of history until I can’t anymore. I do wonder how many of my fellow comrades I might come into conflict with once this all kicks off.

    • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Not enough ammo…

      They have the popular vote, most gun nuts are right wing. And they have the military, most of which voted trump. Are there even enough people who are left of center to fight against that?

      • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        That’s just what they want you to believe. Most of the country does not support the capitalists. Support for Luigi remains bi-partisan.

    • labbbb2@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      Violence’s bad. I think it won’t help anyway, unless it only makes things worse and society even more divided, leading the country into cycles of endless dictatorship, especially when we know that 70+ millions Americans voted for felon.

      One of the ways to get rid of illegitimate leaders is for at least 50%+ of the entire country to get together and protest all the way to Washington.

      There is another way - if it’s in your power, don’t obey the regime in any way.

      That’s the whole point of dictators - they come in when some economic crisis starts and/or the people are divided.

      By the way, authoritarians thanks to the fact that people are divided, and continue to rule. And also political apathy and social conservatism are only to the advantage of dictators, so they should have been regarded as evil from the beginning

  • mox@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    I suspect the vast majority of people turning to social media as a pressure release valve feel disempowered, and don’t know what more they can reasonably do. When voting is no longer enough, and you have little time or money to spare, what’s next? How can a fly meaningfully change the path of a rhino stampede?

    This article is insightful, but practically useless. I think it would be better if it also presented specific actions and achievable goals that would lead to shutting down the encroaching fascism.

    • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Vast numbers of people feeling disempowered … sounds like the Trump crowd when he appeared and proclaimed himself their savior. Liberals are in for the same treatment from someone with a different sales pitch. Some people think that’s who Kamala Harris was, I truly believed in her, but maybe that was the whole plan and it’s already like professional wrestling - you win this match, I’ll win the next one, and we both take home the money. I dunno.

    • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      People need to know that posting doesn’t actually do anything!

      posts an article about it

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      How about joining the Fediverse?

      And ad blocking.

      Seriously. Participation in Google/Meta/Tiktok/Whatever and their manipulative algorithms is what makes a lot of this go around. Break their ad revenue, break out of the algorithms, and you break their manipulation.

      It’s easy. It’s free. You can do it on your butt, in the same timeslots you doomscroll. And it would draw more devs into developing/hosting.

    • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Well at least the article validated some of my feelings and gave me a sense identification of the problems I have been sensing around me with the flaccid liberal rebellion.
      Hey wait a sec! Dammit!

      Most concrete action I can think of is some posts I remember seeing about coat-hanger do it yourself frontal lobotomies. I’ve seen plenty of very low IQ Americans with economic status as bad or worse than mine somehow perfectly happy with all the fascist shit that is going down. This seems like an opportunity to join in their bliss.

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          I’m talking about a guy who made no impact on a single company much less an industry and then went to jail awaiting prison, throwing away all of his rich boy ivy league education, because people like YOU keep bringing him up.

            • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              5 hours ago

              Since you’re refusing to back up your stance I take that to mean you’ve resigned from the argument and that you agree with me.

              • Dasus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                5 hours ago

                Back up my stance of “you’re talking about it” when you start your comment with “I’m talking about it”?

                I really don’t see a reason to “back that up” any further. You did all for me.

                • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  4 hours ago

                  I see you have the memory of the goldfish so I’ll recap the discussion for you.

                  • User above stated we need more luigis

                  • I brought up the fact that Luigi 1 accomplished nothing

                  • You retort that we are talking about it

                  So either your response was completely pointless and off topic or you meant it as evidence that Luigi 1 accomplished something. What did he accomplish? How does talking about it change anything for anyone?

  • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    126
    ·
    11 hours ago

    The greatest thing that social media ever did for humanity was in its ability to allow all of us to talk to each other in an open platform.

    Those private corporate platforms have slowly been eroded and controlled to only waste our time and designed to keep us all angry, afraid, anxious and confused.

    Open decentralized social media is bringing us back to that era 20 years ago when social media was just starting and people just talked and openly discussed the issues of the day with one another. It doesn’t matter what kind of platform we have or can create, as long as it is decentralized and controlled by people, everyone will always find value in it because it allows us to talk to one another. The greatest thing I’ve ever found in taking part in the fediverse was in connecting to like minded people who want to talk about the important issues of the day without all the distractions of advertising and without having having to give up my privacy or security and have my identity sold to the highest bidder.

    • SouthEndSunset@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Same. I’ve learned a lot since I joined Lemmy.

      I genuinely believe centralised social media was created to make you feel like you’re doing something.

    • Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      While I like to agree with that vision of decentralized social media, even here on lemmy we have our own pitfalls. Echo chambers are unchecked and defederation (even justified) happens.

      I don’t assume everyone here is a real person. There was a article recently that AI was training “persuasiveness” using reddit subreddits. I have to believe a similar trial exists on the fediverse least I be caught off guard.

      Plus, there are a lot of folks here (it seems like a majority sometimes in my personal experience) that are quick to advocate violence/sabotage in lieu of negotiation and debate. That reaks of puppeteering; there can’t be that many arseholes here, right?

      I know I have some strong biases that lean towards peace, and I’m confused sometimes why a comment of mine in the fediverse gathers double digit upvotes steadily only to plummet to the negatives overnight. I get old reddit botnet vibes on some topics.

      I suppose I want to like lemmy, the freedom, these communities, but it is still polarizing and influenceable by [insert tech/political/financial interests]. I don’t trust this enough to recommend to friends and family, but my presence here makes it a fraction more what I want to be.

      • EndRedStateSubsidies@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        Something like 80% of all theft at this point is unpaid wages.

        You have to understand that a system that calls corporations people is inherently violent. Profit is unpaid labor, so the existence of a tax code that not only allows -but celebrates and defends- billionaires is class warfare. If you steal $1000 from a store, the police show up. If the store steals $1000 from your paycheck the police tell you to get a lawyer with a $5k retainer. The store’s existence isn’t hampered by the $1,000 while most families would be ruined without out.

        However, the only instance of the crime the system cares about is the one against the corporation.

        Corporations are the only people that don’t have to worry about eating. Corporations are the only people that don’t have hands for handcuffs. Corporations are the only people the law cares about.

        Corporations own the media. Corporations own the red ones. Corporations own the blue ones. Corporations own the food. Corporations are eager to own everything the DNC will meet the RNC half way in privatizing.

        We are here because infinite money now equates to infinite speech. We as individuals have ever less speech because we have ever less money. Unions are being crippled now and soon protesting itself will become a crime against the state.

        It will be a crime to speak out. It will be a crime to be different. It will be a crime to work too slow or think too much.

        When every notion of freedom becomes a crime, crime becomes our only freedom.

        Ready Player 2 mother fuckers.

      • schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Plus, there are a lot of folks here (it seems like a majority sometimes in my personal experience) that are quick to advocate violence/sabotage in lieu of negotiation and debate. That reeks of puppeteering; there can’t be that many arseholes here, right?

        That’s because there are a lot of marginlized folks here - gay, trans, autistic, linux users - who have spent decades disucssing politely and negotiating.

        Problem is the people throwing Nazi salutes and writing all these executive orders have, quite clearly, said they want us all either dead or in camps.

        Now I wouldn’t dream of speaking for everyone else, but I’m certainly not going to be attempting to politely debate myself out of a one-way train ride, if it comes to that.

        So, yeah, while I don’t encourage violence for the sake of violence, the neoliberal ‘oh dear we must all be very polite at all times and let rationality solve all our issues!’ is dead and worthless.

        I’ve taken classes for and armed myself, and I have zero qualms with defending myself and friends and family by any means necessary if it comes down to a situation where it’s us-or-them, regardless of who ‘them’ is.

        If you told me even five years ago that I’d be carrying a gun and be fully prepared to use deadly force to defend myself I’d have called you goofy, and if you told me that I’d be willing to use it against agents of the state if they came after me, I’d think you have lost your damn mind.

        But, well, it’s been a long 5 years, and frankly, IMO, the rule of law and the trust in any governmental institutions have been eroded into nothing.

        • sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          Amazing take, no notes. I’ve done my due diligence, I’ve voted, I’ve canvassed for campaigns, I’ve donated to the right people.

          I will NOT be debating with fascists or agitators while my friends and family members get taken away for being trans or the wrong shade of brown (or a Linux user lol). Someone in a more privileged position than me can.

          I used that time to get my carry license instead.

      • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        I know I have some strong biases that lean towards peace, and I’m confused sometimes why a comment of mine in the fediverse gathers double digit upvotes steadily only to plummet to the negatives overnight. I get old reddit botnet vibes on some topics.

        That’s probably time zones. I’m in Europe, and I’ve noticed that if I post something that’s not in line with mainline American thinking, I’ll wake up to a bunch of downvotes. The same could be true for Oceania/Asia or Europe/africa, depending on where you are.

      • auraithx@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Yes we’re missing two things

        • Anonymous ID / Reputation system to tell it’s a human
        • Community-run moderation. So some chronically online sadsack can’t ban you from a significant portion of lemmy for life because you disagreed with them.
      • callouscomic@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Fuck negotiating and debate. That’s what has allowed the rich to erode or steal everything we could have had. That’s what allows wimpy politicians to get walked all over as the bullies take over again and again.

      • militaryintelligence@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        I am definitely one of those “to arms” types because I think talking is over. That’s all the oligarchs want, more talk. When a forum for discussion is introduced the controlling powers study it for monetization and misinformation purposes. When they figure out how to manipulate the fediverse and platforms like Bluesky it’ll be over. It’s important we keep ads off of them or they’ll dictate the discussion

      • errer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        there can’t be that many arseholes here, right?

        oh my sweet summer child

    • heavydust@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      allow all of us to talk to each other

      I was doing that just fine 30/40 years ago with BBS, newsgroups, and later with forums such as Lemmy. Social media put a name or a face on people, and was combined with the regular “eternal septembers,” but it didn’t bring anything useful to the conversation IMHO.

      • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        It did break down the barriers for those less technical by bringing the conversation to a web browser that was certainly more accessible as opposed to a terminal, for better or worse. It’s not far off from the fediverse in that it does take some technical understanding to navigate, which does create a sort of barrier. Now, whether that is good or bad is a subject of debate, and I’m inclined to agree that the more accessible a platform is, the more watered down the conversations become.

        • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 hours ago

          It did break down the barriers for those less technical by bringing the conversation to a web browser that was certainly more accessible as opposed to a terminal, for better or worse.

          I beg your pardon, but what about web forums? I don’t think anything technical was required with those.

          • Balder@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 hours ago

            They were good, but is there good forum platforms nowadays that are mobile friendly, have apps etc.?

            • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 hour ago

              WDYM mobile-friendly? There are plenty of engines, I suppose some have adaptive design.

              Anyway, I remember browsing websites of that time using Sony PSP default browser. This was certainly harder than anything you get today. Still bearable enough.

              Just opened one forum made with Invision Power Board, it is of course not adaptive, but I don’t need endless scroll on a forum. Pretty usable with, well, zoom in, zoom out, tap. All that.

              WDYM have apps? You have a web browser. It’s intended to visit websites. I would understand if those apps would provide any functionality outside of that of a website. Maybe putting website bookmarks on the home screen would be a good user-friendly feature for Android though. Those could even use RSS to indicate something. Maybe those should be just RSS indicators even.

              If you mean that you don’t want web, just something like Usenet - I have no answer except Usenet itself. Freenet (Locutus) seems to have a winter depression, but I haven’t visited their Matrix channel lately.

      • Zorque@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        You are the exception, not the rule. Just because you have an easy time with something does not mean everyone does. Everyone experiences interaction in a different way.

        Just because it brings no value to your life does not mean that opinion is universal.

        • heavydust@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Just because you have an easy time with something does not mean everyone does

          That was the whole point of my answer.

    • bluGill@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Only for the moment. Spammers have already found us, but so far in small numbers. All the other bad parts of social media are already here too, just so far not in large amounts and so you can find useful content. But those who gain from the garbage are coming and decentralization doesn’t help.

    • alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 hours ago

      The next step, in my opinion, is strong privacy and decentralized organization that fully leverages constitutional rights.

      I.e. a privacy preserving social media where labour unions, political parties and religious groups can federate with each other. Servers hosted on their premises and members register through an on-premise process.

      A church in a foreign country could generate a thousand aliases and distribute them to their federated sister organizations in a privacy preserving way. Only the church knows which organizations got which aliases and they protect this information.

      Your local labour union chapter picks up 20 of those aliases and distributes them to members. They are the only one who knows the person behind the alias.

      An observer in this private fediverse trying to obtain the identity would first need to approach the church. The church can stall them and warn downstream through a canary.

      The labour union chapter observes the canary and immediately wipes all information.

      And if that fails, then full I2P and Tor, with nodes hosted on-premise of churches, political parties and labour unions.

      • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        10 hours ago

        constitutional rights

        Hate to say it, but there’s the very real possibility those days are numbered.

        As it sits, those of us that are savvy need to be actively using and promoting privacy-centric communications methodology to ensure we have a means to communicate safely and effectively as time goes on and those tights are further eroded. I don’t see the internet completely dying, given the technical nature of it, but peering and connectivity will likely be hampered in the coming months and years, so it is in our best interest to find and employ feasible solutions now to attempt getting out ahead of anything those muppets come up with.

        • alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          You are missing the point.

          Those days might be numbered, but these places are the last bastion.

          They will invade private homes, businesses and offices with impunity first.

          Churches in particular have a long history of being relatively safe in (civil) war.

          Not immune, just relatively.

        • samus12345@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Yeah, the US Constitution is just a piece of paper now because nobody’s enforcing it.

            • samus12345@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              9 hours ago

              Oh god, I haven’t checked the White House website since it went full fascist. A big-ass picture of Dear Leader right at the top. North Korea, China, Russia…even those countries don’t have anything so blatantly cult of personality on the front page of their government websites.

    • fuzzy_ad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Open decentralized social media is bringing us back to that era 20 years ago when social media was just starting and people just talked and openly discussed the issues of the day with one another.

      Unless the mods remove your posts.

        • auraithx@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          Doesn’t really work once spaces are established. Most of reddits problems aren’t the admins, it’s the volunteer subreddit mods which function just the same as lemmy.

          • enkers@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 hours ago

            Remember, there were plenty of rounds of moderator purges on reddit, especially when subs would lock down in protest. Any mod with ethics and a backbone would’ve been shown the door. So I think it’s fair to say a lot of the moderation problems were at least in part caused by the admins.

            At least on Lemmy, different instances have different ethoses, so communities can be more in line with the instance they’re on, and there isn’t this need for absolute centralised conformity.

            Also, having public mod logs is a big step towards transparency. Sure there are still problems, but it’s definitely no where near as bad IMO.

  • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    No. You claim to be a journalist; you don’t just stop reporting on the President of the United States. We don’t have that luxury.

    Sounds like a complicit media attempting to absolve itself.

  • JOMusic@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 hours ago

    As someone who is outside the US, the best I can do is share important information with people inside the US.

    I would be very surprised if any of our US-Allied governments call out Trump. I would be overjoyed, but surprised.

  • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    But when it comes to addressing the problems we face, no amount of posting or passive info consumption is going to substitute the hard, unsexy work of organizing.

    No shit, so when I’d say this in year 2013, it wasn’t worthless nerd screeching aimed at satisfying my hunger for attention which I don’t get because I’m a worthless nerd and can’t accept the new world where tech helps, you know, normal socialized people, not like me, to fix every problem with their mutual likes and reposts and flashmobs.

    Seems damn clear that radio reproductors on German streets didn’t help against Nazism.

    • OpenStars@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I would argue that journalism is necessary, just not sufficient, for moving into the future.

      Ironically this is true for every one of the myriad sides in this conflict.

      I recall a sci-fi book from CS Lewis… anyway my point is that this was well known after WWII, and probably often had to be rediscovered throughout history. Strong societies produce weak children and so on. We’ve had our Yin, now time for the karmic Yang to brutalize us for being so extremely negligent.

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        Maybe it’s better to refrain from growing strong men, though, just average will do, with average children, not weak.

        ADD:

        Also from LOTR, a smart thing in the same direction, I think one can find most of Tao Te Ching and Art of War rephrased in LOTR.

        “Other evils there are that may come; for Sauron is himself but a servant or emissary. Yet it is not our part to master all the tides of the world, but to do what is in us for the succour of those years wherein we are set, uprooting the evil in the fields that we know, so that those who live after may have clean earth to till. What weather they shall have is not ours to rule”

        • OpenStars@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          I’m not sure how it is possible to produce merely average people though? Anyway, even if humanity itself were to not change, the world around us still does. Perhaps one day aliens will show up, assuming that climate change doesn’t kill us all in the moderate term future. Just like all those species of animals and plants and such that we’ve driven extinct: they lasted so long, but then could not survive us.

          So I would argue that we always should remain strong… it’s just that the definition of what that even means will constantly keep changing, in response to our circumstances.

          But, Stoicism, yeah - it’s literally all that we can do, so let’s do that.:-)

          • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 hours ago

            I’m not sure how it is possible to produce merely average people though?

            Not getting excited with global solutions and utopias. At some point in my 12-15 I considered libertarianism a far wiser ideology than the rest due to this, but then noticed how there are libertarian utopias emerging for all tastes. Panarchy (that’s not yet a thing), agorism (that to some extent is, with cryptocurrencies and internet connectivity) and maybe something else.

            Any wise construct stops being wise if you rely on it too much.

            So people thinking “correctly” are not those you want to have, people familiar with good things, but not invested too much, are.

            If you build a construct (say, in a game like Civilization) with -7 modifier to fascism, then the humanity will regulate to that and negate the modifier. Then your construct crumbles, and the humanity gets +7 to fascism. Was it really a good idea in the first place then?

            So I would argue that we always should remain strong… it’s just that the definition of what that even means will constantly keep changing, in response to our circumstances.

            And that means that trying to remain strong we’ll waste effort in all directions instead of having some when needed.

            But, Stoicism, yeah - it’s literally all that we can do, so let’s do that.:-)

            Stoicism is about spending effort where you should and not spending when you shouldn’t. It’s not pure inaction, it’s the way to do less nonsense.

            EDIT: Or the biblical example with 7 abundant years and 7 hungry years - imagine taking all the increase in food for granted, many more children being born, many more slaves brought in, expecting to be able to pay many more debts perhaps, thus taking more, and then during hungry years not only the difference in population dying, but more (because those who die from hunger still consume food before it, those who are used to eating more need more to survive, some debt payments can’t be postponed, and a weaker state spends more resources to defend its borders).

    • quazar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      which is why i refused to pay for tv/movies. I refused to spend my hard earned money on their “circus”

  • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I have the social skills of a cholla cactus and so when someone says ѻɼﻭคกٱչﻉ ץѻપɼ กﻉٱﻭɦ๒ѻɼɦѻѻɗ กﻉՇฝѻɼᛕ I find it only confusing and unintelligible. I did consider making cookies for my neighbors with a notice saying _I don’t know how to ዐዪኗልክጎጊቿ ል ክቿጎኗዘጌዐዪዘዐዐዕ ክቿፕሠዐዪጕ but maybe someone else does…here’s some cookies? Mind you, my neighborhood is a tad lower class and has an air of desperation so they may not trust my cookies.

    It’s a thought. My kitchen appliances are lent out right now, and I don’t actually know how to bake.

    But I seem to understand enough leftist theory to bridge those who, like me, have been brainwashed to see communism and socialism as derisives and terms of contempt.

    I’m also going through a psychotic break because a lot of stressors piled up at the same time seventy-seven million voters decided to give the Genie’s lamp to Jaffar.

    • quazar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      People even knowing their next door neighbors NAME is leaps and bounds ahead of where we are right now.