The Fediverse - especially the microblogging side of it - has deep issues when it comes to environmental sustainability.

And the high resource requirements, which result from an incredible level of redundancy, aren’t just bad environmentally: they make running a server more costly, and increase our reliance on Big Tech’s infrastructure.

I wrote about all this, along with some suggestions for how we can improve things somewhat.

  • @SorteKaninA
    link
    English
    523 days ago

    how much is the Fediverse’s energy usage compared to those of AI services or cryptocurrency farms?

    Practically 0.

    • Handles
      link
      fedilink
      English
      223 days ago

      That’s my intuition too. Would like to see sources to back it up though.

      • @SorteKaninA
        link
        English
        10
        edit-2
        23 days ago

        Well this site says that the bitcoin network uses at least 91 TWh annually.

        According to fediverse.observer, there’s roughly 21000 Fediverse servers online.

        Let’s just assume that a server on the Fediverse uses 500W. That’s quite a high estimate btw, but we can overestimate, it’s fine.

        That gives roughly 0.09 TWh annually, or about 0.1% of the bitcoin network. And remember that’s an overestimate and remember that that only considers bitcoin and no other cryptocurrencies.

        • Handles
          link
          fedilink
          English
          323 days ago

          👍 That confirms my own assumptions, thanks for the link and estimated comparison!